Literature DB >> 15549717

Olfactory morphology of carcharhinid and sphyrnid sharks: does the cephalofoil confer a sensory advantage?

Stephen M Kajiura1, Jesica B Forni, Adam P Summers.   

Abstract

Many hypotheses have been advanced to explain the adaptive significance of the sphyrnid cephalofoil, including potential advantages of spacing the olfactory organs at the distal tips of the broad surface. We employed comparative morphology to test whether the sphyrnid cephalofoil provides better stereo-olfaction, increases olfactory acuity, and samples a greater volume of the medium compared to the situation in carcharhiniform sharks. The broadly spaced nares provide sphyrnid species with a significantly greater separation between the olfactory rosettes, which could lead to an enhanced ability to resolve odor gradients. In addition, most sphyrnid species possess prenarial grooves that greatly increase the volume of water sampled by the nares and thus increase the probability of odorant encounter. However, despite a much greater head width, and a significantly greater number of olfactory lamellae, scalloped hammerhead sharks do not possess a greater amount of olfactory epithelial surface area than the carcharhiniform sandbar sharks. Therefore, sphyrnid sharks might not possess any greater olfactory acuity than carcharhinids. Despite this, there are clear olfactory advantages to the cephalofoil head morphology that could have led to its evolution, persistence, and diversification. persistence, and diversification. 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15549717     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  6 in total

1.  Microstructure of the Bonnethead Shark (Sphyrna tiburo) Olfactory Rosette.

Authors:  Lauren E Simonitis; Christopher D Marshall
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2022-07-18

2.  Response of the hammerhead shark olfactory epithelium to amino acid stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy C Tricas; Stephen M Kajiura; Adam P Summers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Role of ecology in shaping external nasal morphology in bats and implications for olfactory tracking.

Authors:  Alyson F Brokaw; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Complete mitochondrial genome of the winghead shark, Eusphyra blochii (Elasmobranchii: Sphyrnidae).

Authors:  Callie H Crawford; Jenny M Kemper; Gavin J P Naylor
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 0.658

5.  A computational study of the hydrodynamics in the nasal region of a hammerhead shark (Sphyrna tudes): implications for olfaction.

Authors:  Alex D Rygg; Jonathan P L Cox; Richard Abel; Andrew G Webb; Nadine B Smith; Brent A Craven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Linking sensory biology and fisheries bycatch reduction in elasmobranch fishes: a review with new directions for research.

Authors:  Laura K Jordan; John W Mandelman; D Michelle McComb; Sonja V Fordham; John K Carlson; Timothy B Werner
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.079

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.