Literature DB >> 19706561

Parents' interest in predictive genetic testing for their children when a disease has no treatment.

Beth A Tarini1, Dianne Singer, Sarah J Clark, Matthew M Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to measure parents' interest in obtaining predictive genetic testing for their children for a disease that has no treatment.
METHODS: We conducted a nationally representative, Internet-based survey of parents. Parents received 2 vignettes describing hypothetical diseases without treatments. The first vignette described a disease in which symptoms were severe and timing of symptom onset was uncertain. The second vignette described a disease in which both symptom severity and timing of symptom onset were uncertain. Parents reported their interest in predictive genetic testing for their youngest child in each vignette by using a 5-point Likert scale. We collected information on parents' demographic features and parents' general opinions about genetic testing. We conducted logistic regression analyses to evaluate the independent associations between these factors and parents' interest in testing for both vignettes.
RESULTS: The response rate was 71%. For the first vignette, 35% of parents were definitely or probably interested in predictive genetic testing for their youngest child, 35% were unsure, and 31% were definitely or probably not interested. Responses were similar for the second vignette. More than one fourth of parents consistently expressed interest in testing in both vignettes.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one third of parents are interested in predictive genetic testing for their children, even for disorders with no treatment. Uncertainty about the severity of symptoms was not related to parents' testing preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19706561     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-2389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  17 in total

Review 1.  Ethics and neuropsychiatric genetics: a review of major issues.

Authors:  Steven K Hoge; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 2.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Research participation by low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups: how payment may change the balance.

Authors:  Jennifer K Walter; James F Burke; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  The 'thousand-dollar genome': an ethical exploration.

Authors:  Wybo J Dondorp; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Genetic testing likelihood: the impact of abortion views and quality of life information on women's decisions.

Authors:  Jessica L Wilson; Gail M Ferguson; Judith M Thorn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Biobank participant support of newborn screening for disorders with variable treatment and intervention options.

Authors:  Megan E Bunnell; Beth A Tarini; Michael Petros; Aaron J Goldenberg; Aishwarya Arjunan; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-09-01

7.  Parents' interest in genetic testing of their offspring in multiplex epilepsy families.

Authors:  Courtney B Caminiti; Dale C Hesdorffer; Sara Shostak; Jeff Goldsmith; Shawn T Sorge; Melodie R Winawer; Jo C Phelan; Wendy K Chung; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Use of genetics in the clinical evaluation and management of heart failure.

Authors:  Daniel P Judge; Rosanne Rouf
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-12

9.  Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel S Dodson; Aaron J Goldenberg; Matthew M Davis; Dianne C Singer; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 10.  Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Beth A Tarini; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.