Literature DB >> 24127923

Research participation by low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups: how payment may change the balance.

Jennifer K Walter1, James F Burke, Matthew M Davis.   

Abstract

Minorities are underenrolled in clinical research trials, and one-third of trials are underenrolled overall. The role of payment has not been studied at the national level as an explanation for enrollment patterns. Our objective was to examine the distribution of self-reported previous research participation across different sociodemographic groups; to assess the public's perception of fair payment for a low-risk medicine trial and the association between requested payment and sociodemographic characteristics; to estimate the amount of payment for a medication trial to achieve proportional representation of minorities and different socioeconomic groups. This was a cross-sectional study with nationally representative data collected in 2011 by the C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health. To determine the relationship between perceived fair payment and individual-level characteristics, we used multivariable linear regression. With 60% participation rate, in a sample of 2,150 respondents 11% (n = 221) of the sample had previously participated in medical research. Requested payment differed significantly by racial/ethnic group with Hispanics requesting more payment than non-Hispanic whites (0.37 [95%CI 0.02, 0.72]) In contrast to payment at $49, $149, and $249, payment at $349 yielded proportional representation of racial/ethnic minority groups. Hispanics requested higher payment for research participation, suggesting a possible explanation for their underenrollment.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hispanic; income; payment; public; race; research

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24127923      PMCID: PMC5350891          DOI: 10.1111/cts.12084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 1752-8054            Impact factor:   4.689


  22 in total

1.  Interpretations of 'appropriate' minority inclusion in clinical research.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; William C Miller; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation?

Authors:  David S Festinger; Douglas B Marlowe; Jason R Croft; Karen L Dugosh; Nicole K Mastro; Patricia A Lee; David S Dematteo; Nicholas S Patapis
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-01-23       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Exploiting a research underclass in phase 1 clinical trials.

Authors:  Carl Elliott; Roberto Abadie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A randomized trial of recruitment methods for older African American men in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; Suzanne L Havstad; Shawna D Davis
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Carpooling and booster seats: a national survey of parents.

Authors:  Michelle L Macy; Sarah J Clark; Gary L Freed; Amy T Butchart; Dianne C Singer; Comilla Sasson; William J Meurer; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants.

Authors:  Emily A Largent; Christine Grady; Franklin G Miller; Alan Wertheimer
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system.

Authors:  G M Swanson; A J Ward
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Parents' concern about their own and their children's genetic disease risk: potential effects of family history vs genetic test results.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Dianne Singer; Sarah J Clark; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2008-11

9.  Informative inducement: study payment as a signal of risk.

Authors:  Cynthia E Cryder; Alex John London; Kevin G Volpp; George Loewenstein
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  Vivek H Murthy; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  11 in total

1.  Public Interest in Medical Research Participation: Does It Matter if Patients or Community Members Have Helped Design the Study?

Authors:  Enesha M Cobb; Achamyeleh Gebremariam; Dianne Singer; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Recruitment and retention: A randomized controlled trial of video-enhanced versus standard consent processes within the E-OPTIMAL study.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; J Eric Jelovsek; Emily S Lukacz; Sunil Balgobin; Alicia Ballard; Alison C Weidner; Marie G Gantz; Ryan Whitworth; Donna Mazloomdoost
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Impact of Race Versus Education and Race Versus Income on Patients' Motivation to Participate in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Anita Kurt; Hope Kincaid; Lauren Semler; Jeanne L Jacoby; Melanie B Johnson; Beth A Careyva; Brian Stello; Timothy Friel; John C Smulian; Mark C Knouse
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-12-26

4.  The effect of multiple recruitment contacts on response rates and patterns of missing data in a survey of bladder cancer survivors 6 months after cystectomy.

Authors:  Joanna E Bulkley; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rosetti; Christopher S Wendel; James V Davis; Kim N Danforth; Teresa N Harrison; Marilyn L Kwan; Julie Munneke; Neon Brooks; Marcia Grant; Michael C Leo; Matthew Banegas; Sheila Weinmann; Carmit K McMullen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Non-oncology clinical trial engagement in a nationally representative sample: Identification of motivators and barriers.

Authors:  Zachary Feuer; Richard S Matulewicz; Ramsankar Basak; Donna A Culton; Kimberly Weaver; Kristalyn Gallagher; Tracy L Rose; Matthew Milowsky; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.261

Review 6.  The ethics of uninsured participants accessing healthcare in biomedical research: A literature review.

Authors:  Hae Lin Cho; Marion Danis; Christine Grady
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Perinatal Preparation for Effective Parenting Behaviors: A Nationally Representative Survey of Patient Attitudes and Preferences.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Lauren K O'Connell; Anna Daly Kauffman; Dianne C Singer; Sarah J Clark; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-02

Review 8.  The Future of Clinical Trial Design in Oncology.

Authors:  Anna Spreafico; Aaron R Hansen; Albiruni R Abdul Razak; Philippe L Bedard; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 38.272

Review 9.  Mediterranean Diet and Cardiometabolic Diseases in Racial/Ethnic Minority Populations in the United States.

Authors:  Mercedes Sotos-Prieto; Josiemer Mattei
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Inclusion of special populations in clinical research: important considerations and guidelines.

Authors:  Stuart S Winter; Janet M Page-Reeves; Kimberly A Page; Emily Haozous; Angelica Solares; Carla Nicole Cordova; Richard S Larson
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2018-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.