Literature DB >> 19705541

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome: a retrospective comparison of visual outcomes at 3 months.

Mesha Tanna1, Steven C Schallhorn, Keith A Hettinger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes of LASIK procedures in which flaps were created with a femtosecond laser (IntraLase FS 60Hz, Abbott Medical Optics [AMO]) to procedures in which flaps were created with a mechanical microkeratome (Moria Evo3 One Use-Plus, Moria SA).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 2000 eyes treated in 2008 for low myopia and astigmatism (sphere < -3.00 diopters [D]; cylinder < or = -0.75 D). The first 1000 consecutive eyes that had LASIK flaps created with a femtosecond laser were compared with the first 1000 consecutive eyes that had flaps created with a mechanical microkeratome. All eyes received wavefront-guided LASIK treatments performed with a VISX S4 IR Advanced CustomVue excimer laser (AMO). Refractive predictability, change in mean spherical equivalent refraction, postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) were compared at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months following surgery.
RESULTS: The refractive accuracy was the same for both groups. At all time points measured, the percentage of eyes that achieved a postoperative UCVA of 20/20 or better was significantly higher in the femtosecond laser group than in the mechanical keratome group. Also, a higher percentage of eyes in the femtosecond laser group achieved a postoperative UCVA of 20/16 at 3 months. Finally, a lower percentage of eyes in the femtosecond laser group lost two or more lines of BSCVA at 1 week and 1 month postoperative.
CONCLUSIONS: Creating LASIK flaps with the femtosecond laser resulted in faster visual recovery and better UCVA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19705541     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090611-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  12 in total

1.  Noninvasive intratissue refractive index shaping (IRIS) of the cornea with blue femtosecond laser light.

Authors:  Lisen Xu; Wayne H Knox; Margaret DeMagistris; Nadan Wang; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Comparison of corneal flap thickness using a FS200 femtosecond laser and a moria SBK microkeratome.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Shi-Sheng Zhang; Qing Yu; Jiang-Xiu Wu; Jing-Cai Lian
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Analysis of microkeratome thin flap architecture using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Karolinne Maia Rocha; J Bradley Randleman; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications of Laser in situ Keratomileusis Flap Creation Using IntraLase Femtosecond Laser and Mechanical Microkeratomes.

Authors:  Ladan Espandar; Jay Meyer
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01

Review 5.  Implantable inlay devices for presbyopia: the evidence to date.

Authors:  Em Arlt; Em Krall; S Moussa; G Grabner; Ak Dexl
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-14

6.  Comparison of astigmatic correction after femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Hidenaga Kobashi; Kazutaka Kamiya; Mohamed A Ali; Akihito Igarashi; Mohamed Ehab M Elewa; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A Review of Presbyopia Treatment with Corneal Inlays.

Authors:  M Amir Moarefi; Shamik Bafna; William Wiley
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2017-04-07

8.  Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser.

Authors:  Sharif Hashmani; Nauman Hashmani; Hina Rajani; Priyanka Ramesh; Junaid Ahmed Soomro; Syed Rashid Hussain Shah; Jaish Kumar; Sayed Mustafa Mahmood Shah
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-23

Review 9.  The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Antonis Aristeidou; Elise V Taniguchi; Michael Tsatsos; Rodrigo Muller; Colm McAlinden; Roberto Pineda; Eleftherios I Paschalis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-14

10.  Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study.

Authors:  Bojan Pajic; Iraklis Vastardis; Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler; Zisis Gatzioufas; Farhad Hafezi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.