Literature DB >> 24790869

Comparison of corneal flap thickness using a FS200 femtosecond laser and a moria SBK microkeratome.

Jing Zhang1, Shi-Sheng Zhang1, Qing Yu1, Jiang-Xiu Wu1, Jing-Cai Lian2.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate differences in flap thickness resulting from use of an Alcon Wavelight FS200 femtosecond laser and a MORIA SBK microkeratome when making a 110-µm-thick corneal flap and to identify the potential factors that affect corneal flap thickness.
METHODS: A prospective case study was performed on 120 eyes of 60 patients who were divided into two groups for LASIK, each group consisting of 60 eyes (30 patients). The corneal flaps were created using an Alcon Wavelight FS200 femtosecond laser or a MORIA SBK microkeratome. The central corneal flap thickness was calculated by subtraction pachymetry. Age, central corneal thickness (CCT), spherical equivalent refraction, mean keratometry, and corneal diameter were recorded preoperatively for analysis.
RESULTS: Cutting of all flaps was easily performed without intraoperative complications. In the Alcon Wavelight FS200 femtosecond laser group, the mean right and left corneal flap thicknesses were 114.0±6.6 µm (range: 98-126) and 111.4±7.6 µm (range: 98-122), respectively. The difference (2.6±9.1 µm) in the corneal flap thickness between the right and left eyes was not significant (t=1.59, P=0.12). Stepwise regression analysis indicated that the resulting corneal flap thickness was unrelated to the patient's age, preoperative CCT, spherical equivalent refraction, mean keratometry, or corneal diameter. In the MORIA SBK microkeratome group, the mean right and left corneal flap thicknesses were 110.6±7.4 µm (range: 97-125 µm) and 108.2±6.1 µm (range: 78-123 µm), respectively. The difference in the corneal flap thickness between the right and left eyes (2.4±6.5µm) was not significant (t=2.039, P=0.0506). The corneal flap thickness was positively correlated with the preoperative CCT through stepwise regression analysis (r=0.297, P=0.021). The corneal flap thickness was not related to age, spherical equivalent refraction, mean keratometry, or corneal diameter. The corneal flap thickness was estimated using the following equation: Tflap=67.77+0.076 CCT (F=5.63, P=0.021).
CONCLUSION: Both the Alcon Wavelight FS200 femtosecond laser and the MORIA SBK microkeratome produced 110-µm-thick corneal flaps. The central corneal flap thickness was positively correlated with the preoperative CCT in MORIA SBK microkeratome surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corneal flap thickness; femtosecond laser; laser in situ keratomileusis; microkeratome

Year:  2014        PMID: 24790869      PMCID: PMC4003081          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  29 in total

Review 1.  Laser in situ keratomileusis: surgical technique.

Authors:  J D Carr; R D Stulting; K P Thompson; G O Waring
Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-06

2.  Anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurement of LASIK flaps: femtosecond laser vs microkeratome.

Authors:  Yuehua Zhou; Lei Tian; NingLi Wang; Paul J Dougherty
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Thin-flap laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Steven G Slade
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Complications of LASIK flaps made by the IntraLase 15- and 30-kHz femtosecond lasers.

Authors:  Payman Haft; Sonia H Yoo; George D Kymionis; Takeshi Ide; Terrence P O'Brien; William W Culbertson
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Analysis of actual corneal flap thickness and confounding factors between first and second operated eyes.

Authors:  Sheng-Yao Hsu; Hsin-Yi Chen; Chin-Pin Chung
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

6.  Effect of thin femtosecond LASIK flaps on corneal sensitivity and tear function.

Authors:  Irina S Barequet; Ami Hirsh; Samuel Levinger
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  The use of the femtosecond laser in the customization of corneal flaps in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Stephen G Slade
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 8.  LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Kerry D Solomon; Luis E Fernández de Castro; Helga P Sandoval; Joseph M Biber; Brian Groat; Kristiana D Neff; Michelle S Ying; John W French; Eric D Donnenfeld; Richard L Lindstrom
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  A prospective, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flap LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Stephen G Slade; Daniel S Durrie; Perry S Binder
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: retrospective comparison.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Jeffrey P Gardiner; Joshua A Schliesser; Ladan Espandar; Vahid Feiz; Mark D Mifflin; Joann C Chang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of visual acuity of the patients on the first day after sub-Bowman keratomileusis or laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Ting Wu; Ze-Hong Dong; Jie Feng; Yu-Feng Ren; Yu-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK).

Authors:  Melisa Ahmedbegovic-Pjano; Alma Biscevic; Amila Alikadic-Husovic; Nita Bejdic; Maja Bohac
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2021-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.