Literature DB >> 19701073

Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Yunn-Yi Chen1, Eun-Sil Shelley Hwang, Ritu Roy, Sandy DeVries, Joseph Anderson, Chrystal Wa, Patrick L Fitzgibbons, Timothy W Jacobs, Gaetan MacGrogan, Hans Peterse, Anne Vincent-Salomon, Taku Tokuyasu, Stuart J Schnitt, Frederic M Waldman.   

Abstract

The clinical, pathologic, and molecular features of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) and the relationship of PLCIS to classic LCIS (CLCIS) are poorly defined. In this study, we analyzed 31 cases of PLCIS (13 apocrine and 18 nonapocrine subtypes) and compared the clinical, pathologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic characteristics of these cases with those of 24 cases of CLCIS. Biomarker expression was examined using immunostaining for E-cadherin, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, estrogen, progesterone, androgen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor2, CK5/6, and Ki67. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization to assess the genomic alterations was performed using microdissected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Patients with PLCIS presented with mammographic abnormalities. Histologically, the tumor cells were dyshesive and showed pleomorphic nuclei, and there was often associated necrosis and microcalcifications. All lesions were E-cadherin negative. Compared with CLCIS, PLCIS showed significantly higher Ki67 index, lower estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor expression, and higher incidence of HER2 gene amplification. The majority of PLCIS and CLCIS demonstrated loss of 16q and gain of 1q. Apocrine PLCIS had significantly more genomic alterations than CLCIS and nonapocrine PLCIS. Although lack of E-cadherin expression and the 16q loss and 1q gain-array-based comparative genomic hybridization pattern support a relationship to CLCIS, PLCIS has clinical, mammographic, histologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features that distinguish it from CLCIS. The histologic features, biomarker profile, and genomic instability observed in PLCIS suggest a more aggressive phenotype than CLCIS. However, clinical follow-up studies will be required to define the natural history and most appropriate management of these lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19701073      PMCID: PMC2783988          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181b18a89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  24 in total

1.  Measurement of DNA copy number at microsatellite loci using quantitative PCR analysis.

Authors:  D G Ginzinger; T E Godfrey; J Nigro; D H Moore; S Suzuki; M G Pallavicini; J W Gray; R H Jensen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number.

Authors:  A M Snijders; N Nowak; R Segraves; S Blackwood; N Brown; J Conroy; G Hamilton; A K Hindle; B Huey; K Kimura; S Law; K Myambo; J Palmer; B Ylstra; J P Yue; J W Gray; A N Jain; D Pinkel; D G Albertson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Lobular neoplasia (so-called lobular carcinoma in situ) of the breast.

Authors:  C D Haagensen; N Lane; R Lattes; C Bodian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Calcifications of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  D Georgian-Smith; T J Lawton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Clinical, histopathologic, and biologic features of pleomorphic lobular (ductal-lobular) carcinoma in situ of the breast: a report of 24 cases.

Authors:  Nour Sneige; Jianzhou Wang; Barbara A Baker; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Lavinia P Middleton
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma: morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis.

Authors:  L P Middleton; D M Palacios; B R Bryant; P Krebs; C N Otis; M J Merino
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Clonality of lobular carcinoma in situ and synchronous invasive lobular carcinoma.

Authors:  E Shelley Hwang; Sarah J Nyante; Yunn Yi Chen; Dan Moore; Sandy DeVries; James E Korkola; Laura J Esserman; Frederic M Waldman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Methodology of immunohistological detection of oestrogen receptor in human breast carcinoma in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue: a comparison with frozen section methodology.

Authors:  D R Snead; J A Bell; A R Dixon; R I Nicholson; C W Elston; R W Blamey; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) Protocol B-17. Five-year observations concerning lobular carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  E R Fisher; J Costantino; B Fisher; A S Palekar; S M Paik; C M Suarez; N Wolmark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Lobular neoplasia of the breast: higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease.

Authors:  D L Page; T E Kidd; W D Dupont; J F Simpson; L W Rogers
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.466

View more
  32 in total

1.  Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a single institution experience with clinical follow-up and centralized pathology review.

Authors:  Marina De Brot; Starr Koslow Mautner; Shirin Muhsen; Victor P Andrade; Anita Mamtani; Melissa Murray; Dilip Giri; Rita A Sakr; Edi Brogi; Tari A King
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Biologic characteristics of premalignant breast disease.

Authors:  Kimberly Cole; Maria Tabernero; Karen S Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

3.  Genomic profiling of pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ reveals highly recurrent ERBB2 and ERRB3 alterations.

Authors:  Beth T Harrison; Faina Nakhlis; Deborah A Dillon; T Rinda Soong; Elizabeth P Garcia; Stuart J Schnitt; Tari A King
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: Can the evidence guide practice?

Authors:  Andrew Pieri; James Harvey; Nigel Bundred
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

5.  Oncogenes induce senescence with incomplete growth arrest and suppress the DNA damage response in immortalized cells.

Authors:  Michael Y Sherman; Le Meng; Martha Stampfer; Vladimir L Gabai; Julia A Yaglom
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 9.304

Review 6.  American Registry of Pathology Expert Opinions: The Spectrum of Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: Diagnostic Features and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Stuart J Schnitt; Edi Brogi; Yunn-Yi Chen; Tari A King; Sunil R Lakhani
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.090

Review 7.  [Lobular neoplasms and invasive lobular breast cancer].

Authors:  H-P Sinn; B Helmchen; J Heil; S Aulmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Underestimation rate of lobular intraepithelial neoplasia in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  Stefano Meroni; Meroni Stefano; Anna Carla Bozzini; Bozzini Anna Carla; Giancarlo Pruneri; Pruneri Giancarlo; Oana Codrina Moscovici; Moscovici Oana Codrina; Patrick Maisonneuve; Maisonneuve Patrick; Simona Menna; Menna Simona; Silvia Penco; Penco Silvia; Lorenza Meneghetti; Meneghetti Lorenza; Giuseppe Renne; Renne Giuseppe; Enrico Cassano; Cassano Enrico
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Lobular carcinoma in situ: diagnostic criteria and molecular correlates.

Authors:  Anna Sokolova; Sunil R Lakhani
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Signet Ring Cell Differentiation in Salivary Duct Carcinoma with Rhabdoid Features: Report of Three Cases and Literature Review.

Authors:  Mayumi Akaki; Akira Ishihara; Kentaro Nagai; Hidekazu Naono; Kenichi Taguchi; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Hiroaki Kataoka
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2020-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.