Literature DB >> 19700998

Differential effects of culture-expanded bone marrow cells on the regeneration of bone between the femoral and the tibial lengthenings.

Hiroshi Kitoh1, Motoaki Kawasumi, Hiroshi Kaneko, Naoki Ishiguro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transplantation of culture-expanded bone marrow cells (BMC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) during limb lengthening shorten the treatment period by accelerating callus formation, but the direct effects of BMC and PRP on the regeneration of the bone have not been determined.
METHODS: Fifty-one bones (23 femora, 28 tibiae) in 28 patients (17 males, 11 females), with an average age of 15.0+/-3.21 years, were lengthened by treatment with BMC and PRP. Clinical outcome was compared between the 51 bones with BMC and PRP treatment and the 60 bones without cell therapy. The parameters including age at surgery, length gained, healing index (HI), number of BMC, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) activity of BMC, and PRP concentration, were compared between the femur and the tibia treated with BMC and PRP. Linear regression analysis was then performed to correlate the HI and other variables.
RESULTS: The HI of the BMC and PRP groups was significantly lower than that of the control group. Average HI, amount of lengthening, number of BMC, BAP activity, and PRP concentration were 30.0+/-6.72 days/cm, 8.10+/-2.90 cm, 1.35+/-0.56 x 10(7), 9.02+/-3.98 U/L, and 2.4+/-0.7 x 10(6)/UL, respectively. There were no significant differences in the length gained, the number and BAP activity of BMC, and the PRP concentration between the femur and the tibia. Femoral lengthening showed significantly faster healing than tibial lengthening, although the age at surgery was significantly older in femoral lengthening. A negative relationship between the HI and the length gained was observed in the tibia. In the femur, there was a negative linear relationship between the HI and the number and BAP activity of BMC, whereas no significant correlations were detected in the tibia.
CONCLUSIONS: In femoral lengthening, decrease in the HI was remarkable by BMC and PRP transplantation, and there was a progressive increase in bone healing as the number and the osteoblastic differentiation of transplanted BMC increased. Our results suggested that regionally varying bone-forming processes by cell transplantation might be related to local blood supply and soft tissue covering. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic retrospective study, level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19700998     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b2afb2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Cell therapy in bone-healing disorders].

Authors:  M Jäger; P Hernigou; C Zilkens; M Herten; J Fischer; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  The role of stem cells in fracture healing and nonunion.

Authors:  Hangama C Fayaz; Peter V Giannoudis; Mark S Vrahas; Raymond Malcolm Smith; Christopher Moran; Hans Christoph Pape; Christian Krettek; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Biological aspects of segmental bone defects management.

Authors:  Ivo Dumic-Cule; Marko Pecina; Mislav Jelic; Morana Jankolija; Irena Popek; Lovorka Grgurevic; Slobodan Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Cell therapy in bone healing disorders.

Authors:  Marcus Jäger; Philippe Hernigou; Christoph Zilkens; Monika Herten; Xinning Li; Johannes Fischer; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2010-09-23

5.  Application of stem cells in orthopedics.

Authors:  Andreas Schmitt; Martijn van Griensven; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Buchmann
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 5.443

6.  Use of autologous human mesenchymal stromal cell/fibrin clot constructs in upper limb non-unions: long-term assessment.

Authors:  Stefano Giannotti; Luisa Trombi; Vanna Bottai; Marco Ghilardi; Delfo D'Alessandro; Serena Danti; Giacomo Dell'Osso; Giulio Guido; Mario Petrini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Bone regeneration and stem cells.

Authors:  K Arvidson; B M Abdallah; L A Applegate; N Baldini; E Cenni; E Gomez-Barrena; D Granchi; M Kassem; Y T Konttinen; K Mustafa; D P Pioletti; T Sillat; A Finne-Wistrand
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 8.  Cross-Talk Between Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) and Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) in Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Cyril Bouland; Pierre Philippart; Didier Dequanter; Florent Corrillon; Isabelle Loeb; Dominique Bron; Laurence Lagneaux; Nathalie Meuleman
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-13

9.  Regenerate augmentation with bone marrow concentrate after traumatic bone loss.

Authors:  Jan Gessmann; Manfred Köller; Holger Godry; Thomas Armin Schildhauer; Dominik Seybold
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2012-03-27

10.  Scaffold-based delivery of autologous mesenchymal stem cells for mandibular distraction osteogenesis: preliminary studies in a porcine model.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Boon Ching Tee; Kelly S Kennedy; Patrick M Kennedy; Do-Gyoon Kim; Susan R Mallery; Henry W Fields
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.