Tina R Raine1, Laura B Epstein, Cynthia C Harper, Beth A Brown, Cherrie B Boyer. 1. Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. rainet@obgyn.ucsf.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The vaginal ring and the transdermal patch offer important contraceptive options for women at high risk for unintended pregnancy. Little is known about what adolescents and young women think about these methods and why use of the ring has been relatively low compared with the patch. We sought to examine young women's attitudes and perceptions about the ring and the patch to better understand the relationship between perceptions of these methods and decisions to use them. METHODS: Sixteen focus groups of young women aged 15-26 years (n=113) from family planning clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area were convened. Data from the focus groups were analyzed using standard content analysis. RESULTS: Although young women expressed apprehension and doubt about both methods, for the most part women expressed more positive attitudes about the patch. Two related themes for the ring and the patch were identified: "lack of trust in effectiveness," and "method use concerns". Two themes unique to the ring ("concerns regarding vaginal insertion" and "sexual partner perceptions") and three themes unique to the patch ("ease of remembering," "visibility issues," and "perceived health risk") were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Increased provider education about apprehensions related to the ring and the patch may lead to increased use of the ring and may counter recent declines in use of the patch. It would be unfortunate if these safe and effective options for young women were to be underused because negative attitudes and perceptions about these methods acted as barriers to adoption.
PURPOSE: The vaginal ring and the transdermal patch offer important contraceptive options for women at high risk for unintended pregnancy. Little is known about what adolescents and young women think about these methods and why use of the ring has been relatively low compared with the patch. We sought to examine young women's attitudes and perceptions about the ring and the patch to better understand the relationship between perceptions of these methods and decisions to use them. METHODS: Sixteen focus groups of young women aged 15-26 years (n=113) from family planning clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area were convened. Data from the focus groups were analyzed using standard content analysis. RESULTS: Although young women expressed apprehension and doubt about both methods, for the most part women expressed more positive attitudes about the patch. Two related themes for the ring and the patch were identified: "lack of trust in effectiveness," and "method use concerns". Two themes unique to the ring ("concerns regarding vaginal insertion" and "sexual partner perceptions") and three themes unique to the patch ("ease of remembering," "visibility issues," and "perceived health risk") were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Increased provider education about apprehensions related to the ring and the patch may lead to increased use of the ring and may counter recent declines in use of the patch. It would be unfortunate if these safe and effective options for young women were to be underused because negative attitudes and perceptions about these methods acted as barriers to adoption.
Authors: Laura B Epstein; Karen Sokal-Gutierrez; Susan L Ivey; Tina Raine; Colette Auerswald Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Miriam Zieman; John Guillebaud; Edith Weisberg; Gary A Shangold; Alan C Fisher; George W Creasy Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Christine Dehlendorf; Diana Greene Foster; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Claire Brindis; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney Journal: Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2011-08-01
Authors: Sara E Vargas; Miriam M Midoun; Melissa Guillen; Melissa L Getz; Kristen Underhill; Caroline Kuo; Kate M Guthrie Journal: Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2019-05-20
Authors: Elizabeth O Schmidt; Aimee James; K Michele Curran; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Tina R Raine; Anne Foster-Rosales; Ushma D Upadhyay; Cherrie B Boyer; Beth A Brown; Abby Sokoloff; Cynthia C Harper Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Kathleen Ridgeway; Elizabeth T Montgomery; Kevin Smith; Kristine Torjesen; Ariane van der Straten; Sharon L Achilles; Jennifer B Griffin Journal: Contraception Date: 2021-10-10 Impact factor: 3.051
Authors: Alexandra Lutnick; Mary Kate Shapley-Quinn; Kgahlisho Nozibele Manenzhe; Jacob Onyango; Kawango Agot; Khatija Ahmed; Ariane van der Straten Journal: J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care Date: 2019 Jan-Dec
Authors: Elizabeth T Montgomery; Mags Beksinska; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Jill Schwartz; Rachel Weinrib; Erica N Browne; Nonhlanhla Mphili; Petina Musara; Manjeetha Jaggernath; Susan Ju; Jenni Smit; Z Mike Chirenje; Gustavo F Doncel; Ariane van der Straten Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.396