Literature DB >> 19699422

Attitudes toward the vaginal ring and transdermal patch among adolescents and young women.

Tina R Raine1, Laura B Epstein, Cynthia C Harper, Beth A Brown, Cherrie B Boyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The vaginal ring and the transdermal patch offer important contraceptive options for women at high risk for unintended pregnancy. Little is known about what adolescents and young women think about these methods and why use of the ring has been relatively low compared with the patch. We sought to examine young women's attitudes and perceptions about the ring and the patch to better understand the relationship between perceptions of these methods and decisions to use them.
METHODS: Sixteen focus groups of young women aged 15-26 years (n=113) from family planning clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area were convened. Data from the focus groups were analyzed using standard content analysis.
RESULTS: Although young women expressed apprehension and doubt about both methods, for the most part women expressed more positive attitudes about the patch. Two related themes for the ring and the patch were identified: "lack of trust in effectiveness," and "method use concerns". Two themes unique to the ring ("concerns regarding vaginal insertion" and "sexual partner perceptions") and three themes unique to the patch ("ease of remembering," "visibility issues," and "perceived health risk") were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased provider education about apprehensions related to the ring and the patch may lead to increased use of the ring and may counter recent declines in use of the patch. It would be unfortunate if these safe and effective options for young women were to be underused because negative attitudes and perceptions about these methods acted as barriers to adoption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19699422      PMCID: PMC2749568          DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  21 in total

1.  Adolescent experiences with the vaginal ring.

Authors:  Laura B Epstein; Karen Sokal-Gutierrez; Susan L Ivey; Tina Raine; Colette Auerswald
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  Contraceptive efficacy and cycle control with the Ortho Evra/Evra transdermal system: the analysis of pooled data.

Authors:  Miriam Zieman; John Guillebaud; Edith Weisberg; Gary A Shangold; Alan C Fisher; George W Creasy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Facilitators and barriers to use of the female condom: qualitative interviews with women of diverse ethnicity.

Authors:  K H Choi; K J Roberts; C Gomez; O Grinstead
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1999

4.  Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs an oral contraceptive: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M C Audet; M Moreau; W D Koltun; A S Waldbaum; G Shangold; A C Fisher; G W Creasy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The acceptability of a combined oestrogen/progestogen contraceptive vaginal ring.

Authors:  E Weisberg; I S Fraser; D R Mishell; M Lacarra; C W Bardin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Efficacy, cycle control, and user acceptability of a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring.

Authors:  Thom O M Dieben; Frans J M E Roumen; Dan Apter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Acceptability of the vaginal diaphragm among current users.

Authors:  Julie E Maher; S Marie Harvey; Sheryl Thorburn Bird; Victor J Stevens; Linda J Beckman
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

8.  The acceptability of the female and male condom: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Andrzej Kulczycki; Dhong-Jin Kim; Ann Duerr; Denise J Jamieson; Maurizio Macaluso
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2004 May-Jun

Review 9.  High acceptability and satisfaction with NuvaRing use.

Authors:  A Szarewski
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Who continues using the diaphragm and who doesn't: implications for the acceptability of female-controlled HIV prevention methods.

Authors:  S Marie Harvey; Sheryl Thorburn Bird; Julie E Maher; Linda J Beckman
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct
View more
  11 in total

1.  Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Diana Greene Foster; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Claire Brindis; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-08-01

2.  A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies.

Authors:  Sara E Vargas; Miriam M Midoun; Melissa Guillen; Melissa L Getz; Kristen Underhill; Caroline Kuo; Kate M Guthrie
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-05-20

3.  Hormonal contraceptive method choice among young, low-income women: how important is the provider?

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Beth A Brown; Anne Foster-Rosales; Tina R Raine
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-09-15

4.  Adolescent Experiences With Intrauterine Devices: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth O Schmidt; Aimee James; K Michele Curran; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  One-year contraceptive continuation and pregnancy in adolescent girls and women initiating hormonal contraceptives.

Authors:  Tina R Raine; Anne Foster-Rosales; Ushma D Upadhyay; Cherrie B Boyer; Beth A Brown; Abby Sokoloff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Vaginal ring acceptability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal ring experiences from around the world.

Authors:  Kathleen Ridgeway; Elizabeth T Montgomery; Kevin Smith; Kristine Torjesen; Ariane van der Straten; Sharon L Achilles; Jennifer B Griffin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Young women's perceptions of the benefits of childbearing: associations with contraceptive use and pregnancy.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Cynthia C Harper; Tina R Raine-Bennett
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-02-08

Review 8.  Transdermal delivery of combined hormonal contraception: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Rosanna M Galzote; Sally Rafie; Rachel Teal; Sheila K Mody
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-05-15

9.  Two Birds with One Stone: Health Care Providers' Perspectives about Prevention Technologies in Kenya and South Africa.

Authors:  Alexandra Lutnick; Mary Kate Shapley-Quinn; Kgahlisho Nozibele Manenzhe; Jacob Onyango; Kawango Agot; Khatija Ahmed; Ariane van der Straten
Journal:  J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec

10.  End-user preference for and choice of four vaginally delivered HIV prevention methods among young women in South Africa and Zimbabwe: the Quatro Clinical Crossover Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Montgomery; Mags Beksinska; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Jill Schwartz; Rachel Weinrib; Erica N Browne; Nonhlanhla Mphili; Petina Musara; Manjeetha Jaggernath; Susan Ju; Jenni Smit; Z Mike Chirenje; Gustavo F Doncel; Ariane van der Straten
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.