Literature DB >> 15306269

The acceptability of the female and male condom: a randomized crossover trial.

Andrzej Kulczycki1, Dhong-Jin Kim, Ann Duerr, Denise J Jamieson, Maurizio Macaluso.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although studies have assessed the acceptability of male and female condoms, comparative trial data are lacking.
METHODS: A sample of 108 women in stable relationships recruited from an urban, reproductive health clinic were randomly assigned to use 10 male or female condoms, followed by use of 10 of the other type. A nurse provided instruction in correct method use. Demographic information was collected in a baseline questionnaire; acceptability data were collected in follow-up and exit questionnaires and coital logs. Nonparametric and chi-square statistics were used to analyze measures of the methods' relative acceptability. Bowker's test of symmetry was adapted to test the null hypothesis of no difference in acceptability between condom types.
RESULTS: Participants used 678 female and 700 male condoms. Although neither method scored high on user satisfaction measures, the 63 women completing the study protocol preferred the male condom to the female condom for ease of application or insertion, ease of removal, general fit, feel of the condom during intercourse and ease of penetration. Participants reported that their partner also favored the male condom, although women generally appeared to like this method more than their partner did. In a direct comparison between the methods at the end of the study, women generally judged male condoms superior on specified preference criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Across a range of criteria, the female condom was less acceptable than the male condom to most women and their partners. Although both types had low acceptability, they are needed and valid methods of pregnancy and disease prevention. That neither rated high on user satisfaction measures underscores the need for more barrier methods that women and men can use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15306269     DOI: 10.1363/psrh.36.114.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  12 in total

1.  Adolescent experiences with the vaginal ring.

Authors:  Laura B Epstein; Karen Sokal-Gutierrez; Susan L Ivey; Tina Raine; Colette Auerswald
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  Sexual barrier acceptability among multiethnic HIV-positive and at-risk women.

Authors:  Olga Villar-Loubet; Deborah Jones; Drenna Waldrop-Valverde; Laura Bruscantini; Stephen Weiss
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  "It's a different condom, let's see how it works": young men's reactions to and experiences of female condom use during an intervention trial in South Africa.

Authors:  Tsitsi B Masvawure; Joanne E Mantell; Zonke Mabude; Claudia Ngoloyi; Cecilia Milford; Mags Beksinska; Jennifer A Smit
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2013-09-20

4.  Who are the preferential targets for intervention programs related to the female condom among sex workers in southern China?

Authors:  Yanhong Wang; Susu Liao; Jingmei Jiang; Margaret R Weeks; Li Nie; Jianghong Li; Bin He; Yuejiao Zhou; Fei Li; Jennifer Dunn; Qingning Zhang
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2013-08

Review 5.  Protein and oligonucleotide delivery systems for vaginal microbicides against viral STIs.

Authors:  Jill M Steinbach
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael A Thomas; B Todd Chappell; Bassem Maximos; Kelly R Culwell; Clint Dart; Brandon Howard
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-07-01

7.  Enhancing acceptability and use of sexual barrier products among HIV concordant and discordant couples.

Authors:  Deborah Jones; Deborah Kashy; Olga Villar-Loubet; Stephen Weiss
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2013-07

8.  Attitudes toward the vaginal ring and transdermal patch among adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Tina R Raine; Laura B Epstein; Cynthia C Harper; Beth A Brown; Cherrie B Boyer
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Serosorting sexual partners and risk for HIV among men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Lisa A Eaton; Seth C Kalichman; Demetria N Cain; Chauncey Cherry; Heidi L Stearns; Christina M Amaral; Jody A Flanagan; Howard L Pope
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Sexual partner selection and HIV risk reduction among Black and White men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Lisa A Eaton; Seth C Kalichman; Chauncey Cherry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.