| Literature DB >> 19698134 |
Dominik Pretscher1, Luitpold V Distel, Gerhard G Grabenbauer, Michael Wittlinger, Maike Buettner, Gerald Niedobitek.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are generally considered to represent a host immune response directed against tumour antigens. TIL are also increasingly recognised as possible prognostic parameters. However, the effects observed are variable indicating that results cannot be extrapolated from type of tumour to another. Moreover, it has been suggested that primary solid tumours may be ignored by the immune system and that a meaningful immune response is only mounted in regional lymph nodes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19698134 PMCID: PMC2739224 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Patient characteristics
| n | (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | 100 | ||
| Male | 32 | (97) | |
| Female | 1 | (3) | |
| 36–40 | 1 | (3) | |
| 41–50 | 10 | (30) | |
| 51–60 | 15 | (46) | |
| 61–70 | 7 | (21) | |
| Tonsils | 8 | (24) | |
| Oropharynx | 12 | (36) | |
| Hypopharynx | 5 | (16) | |
| Mouth | 8 | (24) | |
| T1 N2 | 7 | (21) | |
| T1 N3 | 1 | (3) | |
| T2 N0 | 1 | (3) | |
| T2 N1 | 2 | (6) | |
| T2 N2 | 5 | (16) | |
| T3 N1 | 1 | (3) | |
| T3 N2 | 5 | (16) | |
| T4 N0 | 1 | (3) | |
| T4 N1 | 1 | (3) | |
| T4 N2 | 6 | (19) | |
| TX N1 | 1 | (3) | |
| TX N2 | 2 | (6) | |
| I | 0 | (0) | |
| II | 1 | (3) | |
| III | 4 | (12) | |
| IV | 28 | (84) | |
| positive | 10 | (31) | |
| negative | 22 | (69) | |
Median, range and mean labeling index for different immune cells (CD3+, CD8+, CD20+, CD68+, FoxP3+, Granzyme B+) within primary tumor, metastatic lymph nodes and uninvolved regional lymph nodes
| TIL | Primary- | Intraepithelial N+ node | Peritumoral N+ node | Non-metastatic node | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cells per 100 tumor cells | cells per image (0.087 mm2) | ||||
| Median (range) | |||||
| Mean ± SE | |||||
| Median (range) | |||||
| Mean ± SE | |||||
| Median (range) | |||||
| Mean ± SE | |||||
| Median (range) | |||||
| Mean ± SE | |||||
| Median (range) | |||||
| Mean ± SE | |||||
| Median (range) | |||||
| Mean ± SE | |||||
Figure 1Mean labeling index of TIL-subsets in the different compartments. Intraepithelial in primary tumor and N+ nodes (A) as well as mean infiltration in peritumoral lymphatic tissue and non- metastatic nodes (B). Mean TIL/CD3 Ratio in the different compartments (C). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2Impact of different TIL subgroups in various compartments on NED-survival rates. Impact of CD20+ – lymphocyte infiltration of peritumoral lymphatic tissue(A), impact of intraepithelial CD8+-TIL in N+ nodes (B) and impact of FoxP3+-TIL infiltration of primary tumor (C).
Impact of infiltration by various immune cell subtypes on disease-free survival (DFS)
| Cut-off value* | DFS | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD3 | >3.04 (n = 16) vs. ≤ 3.04 (n = 16) | 85% vs. 67% | 0.4 |
| CD8 | >2.49(n = 16) vs. ≤ 2.49(n = 16) | 79% vs. 69% | 0.29 |
| FoxP3 | >1.81 (n = 17) vs. ≤ 1.81(n = 15) | 86% vs. 63% | 0.27 |
| CD20 | >0.23 (n = 18) vs. ≤ 0.23(n = 13) | 83% vs. 81% | 0.8 |
| CD68 | >1.02 (n = 16) vs. ≤ 1.02(n = 16) | 73% vs. 75% | 0.8 |
| Granzyme B | >0 (n = 18) vs. = 0(n = 15) | 82% vs. 68% | 0.53 |
| CD3 | >3.52 (n = 13) vs. ≤ 3.52 (n = 14) | 77% vs. 62% | 0.26 |
| CD8 | >1.29 (n = 14) vs. ≤ 1.29 (n = 14) | 91% vs. 53% | |
| FoxP3 | >2.26 (n = 14) vs. ≤ 2.26 (n = 13) | 84% vs. 53% | 0.17 |
| CD20 | >1.76 (n = 12) vs. ≤ 1.76 (n = 11) | 82% vs. 60% | 0.29 |
| CD68 | >1.05 (n = 14) vs. ≤ 1.05 (n = 13) | 67% vs.73% | 0.9 |
| Granzyme B | >0 (n = 11) vs. = 0(n = 19) | 80% vs. 68% | 0.46 |
| CD3 | >204.5 (n = 13) vs. ≤ 204.5 (n = 13) | 66.7% vs. 80.8% | 0.25 |
| CD8 | > 37.5 (n = 12) vs. ≤ 37.5 (n = 12) | 72.7% vs. 76.4% | 0.53 |
| FoxP3 | > 44 (n = 11) vs. ≤ 44 (n = 12) | 90.9% vs. 62.3% | 0.18 |
| CD20 | > 192 (n = 11) vs. ≤ 192 (n = 11) | 100% vs. 63.6% | |
| CD68 | > 5.5 (n = 13) vs. ≤ 5.5 (n = 13) | 76.9% vs. 81.5% | 0.5 |
| Granzyme B | >0 (n = 15) vs. = 0 (n = 15) | 78.6% vs.67.3% | 0.65 |
| CD3 | >183 (n = 15) vs. ≤ 183 (n = 16) | 75.0% vs. 73.3% | 0.675 |
| CD8 | >88 (n = 15) vs. ≤ 88 (n = 16) | 84.6% vs. 65.6% | 0.337 |
| FoxP3 | >49 (n = 15) vs. ≤ 49 (n = 16) | 78.6% vs. 71.1% | 0.905 |
| CD20 | >147 (n = 15) vs. ≤ 147 (n = 16) | 79% vs. 68.6% | 0.779 |
| CD68 | >4 (n = 12) vs. ≤ 4 (n = 17) | 75.8% vs. 68.8% | 0.424 |
| Granzyme B | >0 (n = 13) vs. = 0 (n = 15) | 73.3% vs.68.8% | 0.939 |
*Median was used as cut-off