PURPOSE: We prospectively compared gadoliniumenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dynamic MRI), superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) (ferucarbotran) MRI and multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and the combination of dynamic MRI plus MDCT vs. dynamic MRI plus SPIO-MRI (double-contrast MRI: DC-MRI) for the detection of small (<or=3 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients with liver cirrhosis and suspicious nodules detected during ultrasound (US) surveillance underwent DC-MRI in the same imaging session and MDCT within 15 days. The final diagnosis was established at pathology on the explanted liver (n=10), resection (n=6) and biopsy (n=38) specimens or at 2-years' follow-up (n=9). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three nodules were detected: 87 were confirmed HCCs in 54 patients. The accuracy of SPIO-MRI and dynamic MRI were similar, both being superior to MDCT. Dynamic MRI demonstrated the highest sensitivity (83.9%; p<0.001). especially for lesions <1 cm (90.6%) - coupled with a lower specificity (36.1%) than SPIO-MRI, particularly in subcentimeter lesions (28.6%). SPIO-MRI demonstrated the highest sensitivity for nodules >1 cm and the highest specificity (83.3%) superior to dynamic MRI (p<0.0001). In the per-lesion analysis, SPIO-MRI demonstrated a positive predictive value higher than dynamic MRI (p=0.0059) and than both the combinations dynamic MRI/MDCT and DC-MRI (p=0.0021 and p=0.0087, respectively). DC-MRI showed the highest sensitivity (97.7%) and accuracy (78.9%), detecting hypovascular and atypical HCCs >1 cm. Furthermore its per-patient negative predictive value was the highest (100%), and significantly higher than all the other methods. CONCLUSIONS: DC-MRI is the most sensitive and accurate method and can be confidently used as a single-step procedure for the detection of small HCCs, with the exception of lesions <1 cm.
PURPOSE: We prospectively compared gadoliniumenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dynamic MRI), superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) (ferucarbotran) MRI and multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and the combination of dynamic MRI plus MDCT vs. dynamic MRI plus SPIO-MRI (double-contrast MRI: DC-MRI) for the detection of small (<or=3 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients with liver cirrhosis and suspicious nodules detected during ultrasound (US) surveillance underwent DC-MRI in the same imaging session and MDCT within 15 days. The final diagnosis was established at pathology on the explanted liver (n=10), resection (n=6) and biopsy (n=38) specimens or at 2-years' follow-up (n=9). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three nodules were detected: 87 were confirmed HCCs in 54 patients. The accuracy of SPIO-MRI and dynamic MRI were similar, both being superior to MDCT. Dynamic MRI demonstrated the highest sensitivity (83.9%; p<0.001). especially for lesions <1 cm (90.6%) - coupled with a lower specificity (36.1%) than SPIO-MRI, particularly in subcentimeter lesions (28.6%). SPIO-MRI demonstrated the highest sensitivity for nodules >1 cm and the highest specificity (83.3%) superior to dynamic MRI (p<0.0001). In the per-lesion analysis, SPIO-MRI demonstrated a positive predictive value higher than dynamic MRI (p=0.0059) and than both the combinations dynamic MRI/MDCT and DC-MRI (p=0.0021 and p=0.0087, respectively). DC-MRI showed the highest sensitivity (97.7%) and accuracy (78.9%), detecting hypovascular and atypical HCCs >1 cm. Furthermore its per-patient negative predictive value was the highest (100%), and significantly higher than all the other methods. CONCLUSIONS:DC-MRI is the most sensitive and accurate method and can be confidently used as a single-step procedure for the detection of small HCCs, with the exception of lesions <1 cm.
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Jeroen G Lijmer Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jorge A Marrero; Hero K Hussain; Hahn V Nghiem; Ramsey Umar; Robert J Fontana; Anna S Lok Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Y Tang; Y Yamashita; A Arakawa; T Namimoto; K Mitsuzaki; Y Abe; K Katahira; M Takahashi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Seong Hyun Kim; Dongil Choi; Seung Hoon Kim; Jae Hoon Lim; Won Jae Lee; Min Ju Kim; Hyo K Lim; Soon Jin Lee Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Thomas J Vogl; Wolfram Schwarz; Stefan Blume; Michael Pietsch; Kohkan Shamsi; Martina Franz; Hartmut Lobeck; Thomas Balzer; Kelly del Tredici; Peter Neuhaus; Roland Felix; Renate M Hammerstingl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2002-09-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: C N De Cecco; V Buffa; S Fedeli; A Vallone; R Ruopoli; M Luzietti; V Miele; M Rengo; M Maurizi Enrici; P Fina; A Laghi; V David Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Jonathan G Sham; Forrest M Kievit; John R Grierson; Peter A Chiarelli; Robert S Miyaoka; Miqin Zhang; Raymond S Yeung; Satoshi Minoshima; James O Park Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jonathan G Sham; Forrest M Kievit; John R Grierson; Robert S Miyaoka; Matthew M Yeh; Miqin Zhang; Raymond S Yeung; Satoshi Minoshima; James O Park Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 10.057