Literature DB >> 12598989

Preoperative evaluation of malignant liver tumors: comparison of unenhanced and SPIO (Resovist)-enhanced MR imaging with biphasic CTAP and intraoperative US.

Thomas J Vogl1, Wolfram Schwarz, Stefan Blume, Michael Pietsch, Kohkan Shamsi, Martina Franz, Hartmut Lobeck, Thomas Balzer, Kelly del Tredici, Peter Neuhaus, Roland Felix, Renate M Hammerstingl.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of iron-oxide-enhanced MRI vs CT during arterial portography (CTAP) and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in detection of liver neoplasms. Seventeen patients with malignant focal liver lesions (liver metastases, n=7), hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC, n=9), and cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC, n=1) underwent presurgical Resovist-enhanced MRI and CTAP. Two independent observers (A and B) assessed the blinded images of unenhanced and iron-oxide-enhanced MRI vs CTAP for the presence, number, and location of the liver lesions. These results were compared lesion by lesion and segment by segment with the results of intraoperative ultrasound ( n=17) serving as the reference standard. Eighty lesions were detected by intraoperative ultrasound in 17 patients. In comparison with IOUS (lesion-by-lesion analysis) the sensitivity was 86.8% for CTAP, 65% for combined unenhanced MR imaging, and 86.8% for combined Resovist-enhanced MRI as well as 86.8% for the combination of unenhanced and Resovist-enhanced MRI. Compared with the sensitivity of combined unenhanced MRI the sensitivity of CTAP as well as the sensitivity of combined Resovist-enhanced MRI was significantly higher (p<0.05). False-positive results were much higher in CTAP as compared with combined unenhanced and SPIO-enhanced MRI. Using the segment-by-segment analysis the specificity of combined unenhanced MRI with 100% (96.7-100%) as well as combined Resovist-enhanced MRI with 100% (96.7-100%) was significantly higher (p<0.05) in comparison with the specificity of CTAP with 91.1% (83.2-96.1%). The accuracy of combined unenhanced MRI was 100% (93.2-100%), combined Resovist-enhanced MRI 100% (93.6-100%) and of CTAP 85.2% (72.9-93.4%). In the detection of focal liver lesions iron-oxide-enhanced MR imaging is superior to unenhanced MRI and similar to CTAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12598989     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1677-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  32 in total

1.  Combining diffusion-weighted MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI improves the detection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  D-M Koh; D J Collins; T Wallace; I Chau; A M Riddell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Value of post-vascular phase (Kupffer imaging) by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using Sonazoid in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Eriko Goto; Ryota Masuzaki; Ryosuke Tateishi; Yuji Kondo; Jun Imamura; Tadashi Goto; Hitoshi Ikeda; Masaaki Akahane; Shuichiro Shiina; Masao Omata; Haruhiko Yoshida; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Assessment of liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma following chemotherapy: SPIO-MRI versus FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  L Bacigalupo; S Aufort; M C Eberlé; E Assenat; M Ychou; B Gallix
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Value of visual inspection, bimanual palpation, and intraoperative ultrasonography during hepatic resection for liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Shojiro Hata; Hiroshi Imamura; Taku Aoki; Takuya Hashimoto; Masaaki Akahane; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Yoshifumi Bekku; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) without ADC values in assessment of small focal nodules in cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Mai-Lin Chen; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Li-Ping Qi; Qing-Lei Shi; Bin Chen; Ying-Shi Sun
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Clinical management of hepatic malignancies: ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Riccardo Lencioni; Clotilde Della Pina; Jordi Bruix; Pietro Majno; Luigi Grazioli; Giovanni Morana; Antonella Filippone; Andrea Laghi; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Is intra-operative ultrasound still useful for the detection of a hepatic tumour in the era of modern pre-operative imaging?

Authors:  Mathieu D'Hondt; Franck Vandenbroucke-Menu; Sébastien Préville-Ratelle; Simon Turcotte; Miguel Chagnon; Marylène Plasse; Richard Létourneau; Michel Dagenais; André Roy; Réal Lapointe
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Diagnostic performance of MDCT, PET/CT and gadoxetic acid (Primovist(®))-enhanced MRI in patients with colorectal liver metastases being considered for hepatic resection: initial experience in a single centre.

Authors:  V O Chan; J P Das; J F Gerstenmaier; J Geoghegan; R G Gibney; C D Collins; S J Skehan; D E Malone
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 9.  Imaging of liver cancer.

Authors:  Ben Ariff; Claire R Lloyd; Sameer Khan; Mohamed Shariff; Andrew V Thillainayagam; Devinder S Bansi; Shahid A Khan; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Adrian K P Lim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of ferumoxides-enhanced and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic three-dimensional volume interpolated breath-hold MR imaging.

Authors:  Hyo-Sung Kwak; Jeong-Min Lee; Young-Kon Kim; Young Hwan Lee; Chong-Soo Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.