Literature DB >> 19697077

Analysis of the pan genome of Campylobacter jejuni isolates recovered from poultry by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and repetitive sequence polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) reveals different discriminatory capabilities.

Melissa K Wilson1, Alison B Lane, Bibiana F Law, William G Miller, Lynn A Joens, Michael E Konkel, Bryan A White.   

Abstract

Campylobacter jejuni is one of the leading bacterial causes of food-borne illness in the USA. Molecular typing methods are often used in food safety for identifying sources of infection and pathways of transmission. Moreover, the identification of genetically related isolates (i.e., clades) may facilitate the development of intervention strategies for control and prevention of food-borne diseases. We analyzed the pan genome (i.e., core and variable genes) of 63 C. jejuni isolates recovered from chickens raised in conventional, organic, and free-range poultry flocks to gain insight into the genetic diversity of C. jejuni isolates recovered from different environments. We assessed the discriminatory power of three genotyping methods [i.e., pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and repetitive extragenic palindromic polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR)]. The rep-PCR fingerprint was generated by determining the presence of repetitive sequences that are interspersed throughout the genome via repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence PCR (ERIC-PCR), and BOX element PCR (BOX-PCR) and combining the data to form a composite fingerprint. The genetic fingerprints were subjected to computer-assisted pattern analysis. Comparison of the three genotypic methods revealed that repREB-PCR showed greater discriminatory power than PFGE and MLST. ERIC-PCR and BOX-PCR yielded the highest number of PCR products and greatest reproducibility. Regardless of the genotyping method, C. jejuni isolates recovered from chickens reared in conventional, organic, and free-range environments all exhibit a high level of genotypic diversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19697077     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-009-9571-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  18 in total

Review 1.  Genomic approaches to typing, taxonomy and evolution of bacterial isolates.

Authors:  V Gürtler; B C Mayall
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 2.  Sources of Campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens.

Authors:  D G Newell; C Fearnley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  The microbial pan-genome.

Authors:  Duccio Medini; Claudio Donati; Hervé Tettelin; Vega Masignani; Rino Rappuoli
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 5.578

4.  The human microbiome project.

Authors:  Peter J Turnbaugh; Ruth E Ley; Micah Hamady; Claire M Fraser-Liggett; Rob Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms.

Authors:  M C Maiden; J A Bygraves; E Feil; G Morelli; J E Russell; R Urwin; Q Zhang; J Zhou; K Zurth; D A Caugant; I M Feavers; M Achtman; B G Spratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences.

Authors:  J Parkhill; B W Wren; K Mungall; J M Ketley; C Churcher; D Basham; T Chillingworth; R M Davies; T Feltwell; S Holroyd; K Jagels; A V Karlyshev; S Moule; M J Pallen; C W Penn; M A Quail; M A Rajandream; K M Rutherford; A H van Vliet; S Whitehead; B G Barrell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Application of the 5'-nuclease PCR assay in evaluation and development of methods for quantitative detection of Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  H K Nogva; A Bergh; A Holck; K Rudi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes.

Authors:  J Versalovic; T Koeuth; J R Lupski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: a food production perspective.

Authors:  Tom Humphrey; Sarah O'Brien; Mogens Madsen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Major structural differences and novel potential virulence mechanisms from the genomes of multiple campylobacter species.

Authors:  Derrick E Fouts; Emmanuel F Mongodin; Robert E Mandrell; William G Miller; David A Rasko; Jacques Ravel; Lauren M Brinkac; Robert T DeBoy; Craig T Parker; Sean C Daugherty; Robert J Dodson; A Scott Durkin; Ramana Madupu; Steven A Sullivan; Jyoti U Shetty; Mobolanle A Ayodeji; Alla Shvartsbeyn; Michael C Schatz; Jonathan H Badger; Claire M Fraser; Karen E Nelson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  8 in total

1.  Use of qPCR and RT-qPCR for monitoring variations of microcystin producers and as an early warning system to predict toxin production in an Ohio inland lake.

Authors:  Jingrang Lu; Ian Struewing; Larry Wymer; Daniel R Tettenhorst; Jody Shoemaker; Joel Allen
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 2.  Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology.

Authors:  Sahreena Lakhundi; Kunyan Zhang
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Pseudomonas viridiflava, a multi host plant pathogen with significant genetic variation at the molecular level.

Authors:  Panagiotis F Sarris; Emmanouil A Trantas; Evaggelia Mpalantinaki; Filippos Ververidis; Dimitrios E Goumas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Analysis of the Campylobacter jejuni genome by SMRT DNA sequencing identifies restriction-modification motifs.

Authors:  Jason L O'Loughlin; Tyson P Eucker; Juan D Chavez; Derrick R Samuelson; Jason Neal-McKinney; Christopher R Gourley; James E Bruce; Michael E Konkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparing the Genetic Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Campylobacter jejuni Recovered from Cattle and Humans.

Authors:  Wonhee Cha; Rebekah E Mosci; Samantha L Wengert; Cristina Venegas Vargas; Steven R Rust; Paul C Bartlett; Daniel L Grooms; Shannon D Manning
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  A framework for assessing the concordance of molecular typing methods and the true strain phylogeny of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli using draft genome sequence data.

Authors:  Catherine D Carrillo; Peter Kruczkiewicz; Steven Mutschall; Andrei Tudor; Clifford Clark; Eduardo N Taboada
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.293

7.  Identifying the seasonal origins of human campylobacteriosis.

Authors:  N J C Strachan; O Rotariu; A Smith-Palmer; J Cowden; S K Sheppard; S J O'Brien; M C J Maiden; M Macrae; P R Bessell; L Matthews; S W J Reid; G T Innocent; I D Ogden; K J Forbes
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.434

8.  The bacterial pangenome as a new tool for analysing pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  L Rouli; V Merhej; P-E Fournier; D Raoult
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2015-06-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.