Literature DB >> 19692386

Sensitivity and specificity of photopic negative response of focal electoretinogram to detect glaucomatous eyes.

S Machida1, K Tamada, T Oikawa, D Yokoyama, M Kaneko, D Kurosaka.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the focal electroretinograms (ERG; focal PhNR) to detect glaucomatous eyes with different degrees of visual field defects.
METHODS: One-hundred and fourteen eyes of 114 patients with open angle glaucoma and 42 eyes of 42 normal controls were studied. The focal ERGs were elicited by a 15 degrees stimulus spot centred on the macula, and on the supero-temporal and on the infero-temporal areas of the macula. The receiver operating characteristic curves were determined to obtain optimal cut-off values. Eyes were classified as being glaucomatous when their focal PhNRs were less than the cut-off values in either retinal area (combined criterion).
RESULTS: The focal PhNR amplitudes were significantly reduced with an advance in the stage of glaucoma. In early glaucoma, the sensitivities of the PhNR measured for each retinal area ranged from 58.1% to 80.7%. The sensitivities were significantly increased to 90.6% and 96.9% for the focal PhNR amplitude and the focal PhNR/b-wave amplitude ratio, respectively, when the combined criterion was employed. The specificity was >90%.
CONCLUSIONS: Focal PhNRs have diagnostic ability in detecting early glaucoma with high sensitivity and specificity, especially when the combined criterion is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19692386     DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.161166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  17 in total

1.  Correlation between N2 amplitude of multifocal ERGs and retinal sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Fusae Kato; Gen Miura; Suguru Shirato; Eiju Sato; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Test-retest reliability of the multifocal photopic negative response.

Authors:  Anthony W Van Alstine; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Assessment of macular function of glaucomatous eyes by multifocal electroretinograms.

Authors:  Nobuhide Hori; Shinya Komori; Hiroki Yamada; Akira Sawada; Yasunori Nomura; Kiyofumi Mochizuki; Tetsuya Yamamoto
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Relation between macular retinal ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer thickness and multifocal electroretinogram measures in experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  Xunda Luo; Nimesh B Patel; Lakshmi P Rajagopalan; Ronald S Harwerth; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability.

Authors:  Adriana Berezovsky; Rustum Karanjia; Arthur Gustavo Fernandes; Gabriel Izan Santos Botelho; Tatiane Luana Novele Bueno; Nívea Nunes Ferraz; Paula Yuri Sacai; Stuart Glenn Coupland; Alfredo Arrigo Sadun; Solange Rios Salomão
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  On and off responses of the photopic fullfield ERG in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Kristina Gottschalk; Christian Y Mardin; Gobinda Pangeni; Anselm G Jünemann; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Focal macular photopic negative response in patients with optic neuritis.

Authors:  H Nakamura; K Miyamoto; S Yokota; K Ogino; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Comparison of photopic negative response of full-field and focal electroretinograms in detecting glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Shigeki Machida; Kunifusa Tamada; Taku Oikawa; Yasutaka Gotoh; Tomoharu Nishimura; Muneyoshi Kaneko; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Relationship between stimulus size and different components of the electroretinogram (ERG) elicited by flashed stimuli.

Authors:  Mathias G Nittmann; Avinash J Aher; Jan Kremers; Radouil Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 10.  Discovery and clinical translation of novel glaucoma biomarkers.

Authors:  Gala Beykin; Anthony M Norcia; Vivek J Srinivasan; Alfredo Dubra; Jeffrey L Goldberg
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 21.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.