Literature DB >> 19692366

A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.

V C Lima1, T S Prata, C G V De Moraes, J Kim, W Seiple, R B Rosen, J M Liebmann, R Ritch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim was to correlate retinal sensitivity as determined by scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry (SLO-MP) in glaucomatous eyes with paracentral visual field (VF) defects detected by standard automated perimetry (SAP).
METHODS: Twenty eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and an SAP VF defect involving the central 16 test points (at least one point with p<1% in the 24-2 VF) were enrolled. Eyes with diseases other than glaucoma were excluded. All patients underwent SLO-MP and SAP of the central 10 degrees . Results from each eye were divided into four quadrants for analysis. Normal and abnormal quadrants by SAP were compared with the corresponding normal and abnormal quadrants by SLO-MP. Regression analysis was used to correlate the mean threshold values (dB) of SLO-MP and SAP in each quadrant. Macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed when there was a disagreement between functional tests.
RESULTS: The mean age and VF mean deviation were 60.8 (13.4) years and -7.3 (6.1) dB, respectively. There was a significant correlation between SLO-MP and SAP results in all quadrants (r(2)> or =0.68, p<0.001). All abnormal SAP quadrants had a corresponding abnormal SLO-MP quadrant. However, 21% of the normal SAP quadrants had an abnormal corresponding microperimetry result; a corresponding significant reduction in total macular thickness measured by OCT was present in 75% of these quadrants.
CONCLUSIONS: Macular sensitivity evaluated by SLO-MP correlates significantly with SAP paracentral VF defects. SLO-MP detected retinal sensitivity reduction in areas of OCT structural damage with normal SAP and suggests that subtle paracentral functional deficits may be present in many more eyes with established glaucoma than generally assumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19692366     DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.159772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  26 in total

1.  Use of microperimetry to compare macular light sensitivity in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Ping Huang; Yan Shi; Xin Wang; Samuel Shao-Min Zhang; Chun Zhang
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  [Fundus perimetry in functional diagnostics of glaucoma. Applicable in the practice?].

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; P C Issa; C Springer; A F Scheuerle
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Structural and functional assessment by hemispheric asymmetry testing of the macular region in preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Chiaki Kawaguchi; Yusuke Nakatani; Shinji Ohkubo; Tomomi Higashide; Ichiro Kawaguchi; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  The effect of trabeculectomy surgery on the central visual field in patients with glaucoma using microperimetry and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Gokulan Ratnarajan; Jasleen K Jolly; Imran H Yusuf; John F Salmon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Microperimetry and optical coherence tomography imaging in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral focal ischaemic glaucoma.

Authors:  Imran H Yusuf; Jasleen K Jolly; Gokulan Ratnarajan; John F Salmon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Macular retinal sensitivity using MP-1 in healthy Malaysian subjects of different ages.

Authors:  Siti Aishah Ismail; Haliza Abdul Mutalib; Nor Fariza Ngah
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-05-27

7.  MICROPERIMETRY AS A SCREENING TEST FOR HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE RETINOPATHY: The Hard-Risk-1 Study.

Authors:  Mustafa Iftikhar; Ramandeep Kaur; April Nefalar; Bushra Usmani; Saleema Kherani; Isra Rashid; Etienne Schönbach; Michelle Petri; Hendrik P N Scholl; Syed M Shah
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Comparison between MP-1 and Humphrey visual field defects in glaucoma and retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; R Theodore Smith; Jonathan P Greenberg; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Macular function in macular degenerations: repeatability of microperimetry as a potential outcome measure for ABCA4-associated retinopathy trials.

Authors:  Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Tomas S Aleman; Willam J Feuer; Sharon B Schwartz; Robert C Russell; Janet D Steinberg; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Clinical value, normative retinal sensitivity values, and intrasession repeatability using a combined spectral domain optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimeter.

Authors:  A Anastasakis; J J McAnany; G A Fishman; W H Seiple
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.