Literature DB >> 21178993

Clinical value, normative retinal sensitivity values, and intrasession repeatability using a combined spectral domain optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimeter.

A Anastasakis1, J J McAnany, G A Fishman, W H Seiple.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish normative values for macular light sensitivity and to determine the intrasession fluctuation of perimetric responses using the OPKO/OTI microperimeter.
METHODS: A total of 32 visually normal subjects participated in the study. A standardized grid pattern was used for testing, which consisted of 28 points arranged concentrically in three circles that occupied an area of 11° (in diameter) within the central macula. Each subject participated in at least two tests. Parameters evaluated included: overall mean macular sensitivity for test 1 and 2, overall difference in mean macular sensitivity between tests, and the mean sensitivity for each circle. The relationship between sensitivity and age was also examined.
RESULTS: The overall median sensitivity for test 1 was 16.8 decibels (dB) and for test 2 was 16.9 dB. The median sensitivities for test 1 and test 2 were not significantly different (P = 0.72). The mean intrasession sensitivity difference was 0.13 dB. The variability of the sensitivity difference between tests decreased as mean sensitivity increased. The sensitivity values averaged across the two tests for inner, middle, and outer circles ranged from 14.3 to 18.8 dB (median value of 16.9 dB), 13.8-18.3 dB (median value of 17.2 dB), and 11.3-18.3 dB (median value of 16.6 dB), respectively. Linear regression analysis showed a 0.5 dB sensitivity loss for each decade of life.
CONCLUSION: We documented a narrow range of intrasession fluctuation using the OPKO/OTI microperimeter. The establishment of normative sensitivity values will facilitate monitoring the loss of macular visual function in patients with retinal disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21178993      PMCID: PMC3052979          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2010.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  13 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Normal values for fundus perimetry with the microperimeter MP1.

Authors:  Edoardo Midena; Stela Vujosevic; Fabiano Cavarzeran
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.

Authors:  Klaus Rohrschneider; Christina Springer; Stefan Bültmann; Hans E Völcker
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Normal values for fundus perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; M Becker; N Schumacher; T Fendrich; H E Völcker
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Assessment of visual function in choroidal neovascularization with scanning laser microperimetry and simultaneous indocyanine green angiography.

Authors:  U Schneider; W Inhoffen; F Gelisken; I Kreissig
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Retinal localization of scotomata by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  G T Timberlake; M A Mainster; R H Webb; G W Hughes; C L Trempe
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Test-retest variability of microperimetry using the Nidek MP1 in patients with macular disease.

Authors:  Fred K Chen; Praveen J Patel; Wen Xing; Catey Bunce; Catherine Egan; Adnan T Tufail; Peter J Coffey; Gary S Rubin; Lyndon Da Cruz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Combined three-dimensional spectral OCT/SLO topography and Microperimetry: steps toward achieving functional spectral OCT/SLO.

Authors:  Gennady Landa; Richard B Rosen; Patricia M T Garcia; William H Seiple
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Landmark-driven fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  J S Sunness; R A Schuchard; N Shen; G S Rubin; G Dagnelie; D M Haselwood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  28 in total

1.  Topical dorzolamide for treatment of cystoid macular edema in patients with choroideremia.

Authors:  Mohamed A Genead; Jason J McAnany; Gerald A Fishman
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Reduced Contrast Sensitivity is Associated With Elevated Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in Type 2 Diabetics Who Have Mild or No Retinopathy.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Structural and functional correlation in sickle cell retinopathy using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry.

Authors:  Clement C Chow; Mohamed A Genead; Anastasios Anastasakis; Felix Y Chau; Gerald A Fishman; Jennifer I Lim
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  VISUAL FUNCTION MEASURES IN EARLY AND INTERMEDIATE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION.

Authors:  Arthika Chandramohan; Sandra S Stinnett; John T Petrowski; Stefanie G Schuman; Cynthia A Toth; Scott W Cousins; Eleonora M Lad
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Longitudinal comparison of visual acuity as measured by the ETDRS chart and by the potential acuity meter in eyes with macular edema, and its relationship with retinal thickness and sensitivity.

Authors:  E Hatef; M Hanout; A Moradi; E Colantuoni; M Bittencourt; H Liu; Y J Sepah; M Ibrahim; D V Do; D L Guyton; Q D Nguyen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Two-photon microperimetry: sensitivity of human photoreceptors to infrared light.

Authors:  Daniel Ruminski; Grazyna Palczewska; Maciej Nowakowski; Agnieszka Zielińska; Vladimir J Kefalov; Katarzyna Komar; Krzysztof Palczewski; Maciej Wojtkowski
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Structural and Functional Abnormalities in Early-stage Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Jason C Park; Yi-Fan Chen; Michelle Liu; Karen Liu; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.424

8.  The value of retinal imaging with infrared scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in patients with stargardt disease.

Authors:  Robert Chun; Gerald A Fishman; Frederick T Collison; Edwin M Stone; Jana Zernant; Rando Allikmets
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Contrast sensitivity is associated with outer-retina thickness in early-stage diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park; Karen Liu; Michelle Liu; Yi-Fan Chen; Felix Y Chau; Jennifer I Lim
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Selective cone photoreceptor injury in acute macular neuroretinopathy.

Authors:  Sean O Hansen; Robert F Cooper; Alfredo Dubra; Joseph Carroll; David V Weinberg
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.