Literature DB >> 2027995

3DFT MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: potential and limitations as a screening examination.

A M Masaryk1, J S Ross, M C DiCello, M T Modic, L Paranandi, T J Masaryk.   

Abstract

The authors compared the three-dimensional Fourier transform (3DFT) time-of-flight magnetic resonance (MR) angiograms in 38 patients initially studied with selective intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for suspected arteriosclerotic disease of the carotid bifurcation. MR angiograms were successfully obtained in 65 of the 75 carotid arteries (87%) visualized with DSA. DSA and MR angiographic studies were assessed for percentage area stenosis by two independent observers on two occasions. Statistical tests indicated consistency in interpretation for each observer as well as between observers. No significant difference was found between the two modalities in ability to depict changes in percentage area stenosis. For the 32 right carotid arteries in the comparison, the median for the difference between MR angiography and intraarterial DSA was 1.83% (range, -22.38% to 55.60%); for the 33 visualized left carotid arteries, it was 0.00% (range, -20.55% to 49.95%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that technically adequate MR angiography may be a sensitive screening examination for stenoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2027995     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.179.3.2027995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  Basic principles of magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  R R Edelman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Infections in emergency medicine--newer imaging strategies.

Authors:  M I Zucker; L Yao
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-03

3.  Intraoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  H Z Montes; D S Shimm
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-03

4.  Magnetic resonance angiography in the head and neck.

Authors:  A N Hasso
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-03

Review 5.  Advances in vascular echoplanar imaging.

Authors:  J F Debatin; D A Leung; S Wildermuth; D Holtz; G C McKinnon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?

Authors:  R L Vanninen; H I Manninen; P K Partanen; H Tulla; P A Vainio
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.

Authors:  Hsin-Neng Hsieh; Hsiu-Yuan Su; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Carotid magnetic resonance angiography: improved image quality with dual 3-inch surface coils.

Authors:  S H Faro; S Vinitski; H V Ortega; F B Mohamed; C Y Chen; A E Flanders; C F Gonzales; R A Zimmerman
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Imaging blood vessels of the head and neck.

Authors:  R J Sellar
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Nonenhanced hybridized arterial spin labeled magnetic resonance angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries using a fast low angle shot readout at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Ioannis Koktzoglou; Matthew T Walker; Joel R Meyer; Ian G Murphy; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.