Literature DB >> 26985124

Smooth bootstrap-based confidence intervals for one binomial proportion and difference of two proportions.

Dongliang Wang1, Alan D Hutson2.   

Abstract

Constructing confidence intervals (CIs) for a binomial proportion and the difference between two binomial proportions is a fundamental and well-studied problem with respect to the analysis of binary data. In this note, we propose a new bootstrap procedure to estimate the CIs by resampling from a newly developed smooth quantile function in [11] for discrete data. We perform a variety of simulation studies in order to illustrate the strong performance of our approach. The coverage probabilities of our CIs in the one-sample setting are superior than or comparable to other well-known approaches. The true utility of our new and novel approach is in the two-sample setting. For the difference of two proportions, our smooth bootstrap CIs provide better coverage probabilities almost uniformly over the interval (-1, 1), particularly in the tail region as compared than other published methods included in our simulation. We illustrate our methodology via an application to several different binary data sets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binary data; bootstrap; confidence interval; proportion; quantile function

Year:  2013        PMID: 26985124      PMCID: PMC4789773          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2012.750283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.404


  4 in total

1.  Prevalence of HIV infection among ex-prisoners in England.

Authors:  P J Turnbull; G V Stimson; K A Dolan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-11

2.  Fully specified bootstrap confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions based on the median unbiased estimator.

Authors:  Yan Lin; Robert G Newcombe; Stuart Lipsitz; Rickey E Carter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.