Literature DB >> 25328802

Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers.

Kevin A Hallgren1, Barbara S McCrady1.   

Abstract

Heavy drinking among college students is associated with social, health, and legal problems. One factor that may contribute to heavy drinking is an attentional bias for alcohol-related cues, which can influence drinking automatically and without an individual's awareness. Using tests of alcohol-related attentional bias, such as the alcohol Stroop task, previous research has shown that alcohol dependent drinkers have greater attentional biases than non-dependent drinkers, but results for college student drinkers have been mixed. The present study examined alcohol Stroop task performance and its relationship to drinking levels and drinking-related problems among 84 college students during the 2009-2010 academic year with at least one binge drinking episode in the previous month. As hypothesized, results indicated that participants had greater attentional interference when alcohol words were presented compared to when neutral words were presented during the Stroop task, suggesting that the students in the sample displayed greater attentional biases for alcohol words compared to neutral words. Results showed that Stroop task responding did not vary by drinking frequency or drinking-related problems, but did vary by drinking intensity. Presentation of alcohol-related cues may cause heavier drinking college students to attend to these stimuli, which may increase the saliency of these cues and influence their likelihood of drinking. Implications for prevention and treatment efforts are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alcohol Stroop test; attention; binge drinking; college students; information processing

Year:  2013        PMID: 25328802      PMCID: PMC4198937          DOI: 10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health


  27 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?

Authors:  Elizabeth T Miller; Dan J Neal; Lisa J Roberts; John S Baer; Sally O Cressler; Jane Metrik; G Alan Marlatt
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2002-03

Review 2.  Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches.

Authors:  Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.067

3.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

4.  Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components.

Authors:  Frank P McKenna; Dinkar Sharma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The short-term effects and unintended long-term consequences of binge drinking in college: a 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Karen M Jennison
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.829

6.  Compelled to consume: the Implicit Association Test and automatic alcohol motivation.

Authors:  Brian D Ostafin; Tibor P Palfai
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2006-09

7.  Carryover effects to addiction-associated stimuli in a group of marijuana and cocaine users.

Authors:  Dinkar Sharma; Sharon Money
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 4.153

8.  Reduced attentional blink for alcohol-related stimuli in heavy social drinkers.

Authors:  Helen Tibboel; Jan De Houwer; Matt Field
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 4.153

9.  The effects of alcohol cue exposure on non-dependent drinkers' attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli.

Authors:  W Miles Cox; Michael A Brown; Lisa J Rowlands
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.826

10.  Alcohol-attentional bias and motivational structure as independent predictors of social drinkers' alcohol consumption.

Authors:  Javad Salehi Fadardi; W Miles Cox
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.492

View more
  5 in total

1.  Differential impairments across attentional networks in binge drinking.

Authors:  Séverine Lannoy; Alexandre Heeren; Nathalie Moyaerts; Nicolas Bruneau; Salomé Evrard; Joël Billieux; Pierre Maurage
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Attentional and approach biases to alcohol cues among young adult drinkers: An ecological momentary assessment study.

Authors:  Brian Suffoletto; Matt Field; Tammy Chung
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  The role of affect, emotion management, and attentional bias in young adult drinking: An experience sampling study.

Authors:  Noah N Emery; Jeffrey S Simons
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  I Can See It in Your Face. Affective Valuation of Exercise in More or Less Physically Active Individuals.

Authors:  Ralf Brand; Lukas Ulrich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-20

5.  Mobile Assessment of Acute Effects of Marijuana on Cognitive Functioning in Young Adults: Observational Study.

Authors:  Tammy Chung; Sang Won Bae; Eun-Young Mun; Brian Suffoletto; Yuuki Nishiyama; Serim Jang; Anind K Dey
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.773

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.