Literature DB >> 22798727

Willingness to Participate in Research during Pregnancy: Race, Experience, and Motivation.

Heather H Gatny1, William G Axinn.   

Abstract

This paper examines the willingness of pregnant women to participate in research on health. We investigate attitudes toward multiple methods of data collection including survey and biomarker data collection. Complete interviews were obtained from a sample of 90 pregnant women in a matched control-comparison study of patients receiving prenatal care in private practice and clinic settings. Women experiencing prenatal care at a clinic reported less willingness to participate in research than women experiencing prenatal care at a private practice. Women who deemed "contributing to science", "learning about pregnancy health", and "helping future patients" as important motivations for participating in research were more likely to express willingness to participate in a study. African American women reported less willingness to answer questions in a survey compared to white women. The results suggest that motivational factors should be integrated into the design of a study of pregnant women to encourage participation.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22798727      PMCID: PMC3393046          DOI: 10.1177/1525822X11419819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Field methods        ISSN: 1525-822X


  30 in total

1.  Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.

Authors:  R M Groves; E Singer; A Corning
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  Distrust, race, and research.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Stephen B Thomas; Diane Marie M St George
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-25

3.  The Tuskegee Legacy Project: willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical research.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; S Steven Kegeles; Nancy R Kressin; B Lee Green; Min Qi Wang; Sherman A James; Stefanie Luise Russell; Cristina Claudio
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2006-11

4.  Cohort profile: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa).

Authors:  Per Magnus; Lorentz M Irgens; Kjell Haug; Wenche Nystad; Rolv Skjaerven; Camilla Stoltenberg
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Attitudes toward participation in a pregnancy and child cohort study.

Authors:  Julie L Daniels; David A Savitz; Chyrise Bradley; Nancy Dole; Kelly R Evenson; Barbara Eucker; Amy H Herring; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; John M Thorp
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Nutritional assessment of pregnant women enrolled in the Special Supplemental Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).

Authors:  A R Swensen; L J Harnack; J A Ross
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-08

7.  Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials.

Authors:  Joel B Braunstein; Noëlle S Sherber; Steven P Schulman; Eric L Ding; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Determinants of participation in state-of-the-art cancer prevention, early detection/screening, and treatment trials among African-Americans.

Authors:  S Millon-Underwood; E Sanders; M Davis
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.592

9.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  Vivek H Murthy; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Attitudes of pregnant women towards participation in perinatal epidemiological research.

Authors:  Sarah Nechuta; Lanay M Mudd; Lynette Biery; Michael R Elliott; James M Lepkowski; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.980

View more
  8 in total

1.  Reasons Why Pregnant Women Participate in Ultrasound Research Involving Transvaginal Scans.

Authors:  Barbara T Meagher; Marissa R Campos; Patrick Thornton; Carrie Klima; Tara A Peters; Josefin Hallberg; Emma Ulfhager; William D O'Brien; Barbara L McFarlin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Participation of Ghanaian pregnant women in an antimalarial drug trial: willingness, experiences and perceptions.

Authors:  Joseph Osarfo; Rose O Adjei; Pascal Magnussen; Harry K Tagbor
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.184

3.  Environmental health attitudes and behaviors: findings from a large pregnancy cohort study.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Sarah Janssen; J Bruce Redmon; Ruby H N Nguyen; Roni Kobrosly; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Recruiting Pregnant Patients for Survey Research: A Head to Head Comparison of Social Media-Based Versus Clinic-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Lindsay Admon; Jessica K Haefner; Giselle E Kolenic; Tammy Chang; Matthew M Davis; Michelle H Moniz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Engaging pregnant women in observational research: a qualitative exploratory study.

Authors:  Evelyne Muggli; Helen Curd; Cate Nagle; Della Forster; Jane Halliday
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The Food, Feelings, and Family Study: comparison of the efficacy of traditional methods, social media, and broadcast email to recruit pregnant women to an observational, longitudinal nutrition study.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith; Crystal Alvarez; Sylvia Crixell; Michelle A Lane
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Mental and physical support (MAPS) for moms: preliminary findings from a prenatal health support program.

Authors:  Kailey Snyder; Danae Dinkel
Journal:  Integr Med Res       Date:  2018-10-26

8.  Individual and healthcare system factors influencing antenatal care attendance in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  W Alanazy; A Brown
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.