Literature DB >> 19689152

An assessment of theoretical methods for nonbonded interactions: comparison to complete basis set limit coupled-cluster potential energy curves for the benzene dimer, the methane dimer, benzene-methane, and benzene-H2S.

C David Sherrill1, Tait Takatani, Edward G Hohenstein.   

Abstract

Large, correlation-consistent basis sets have been used to very closely approximate the coupled-cluster singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] complete basis set potential energy curves of several prototype nonbonded complexes, the sandwich, T-shaped, and parallel-displaced benzene dimers, the methane-benzene complex, the H2S-benzene complex, and the methane dimer. These benchmark potential energy curves are used to assess the performance of several methods for nonbonded interactions, including various spin-component-scaled second-order perturbation theory (SCS-MP2) methods, the spin-component-scaled coupled-cluster singles and doubles method (SCS-CCSD), density functional theory empirically corrected for dispersion (DFT-D), and the meta-generalized-gradient approximation functionals M05-2X and M06-2X. These approaches generally provide good results for the test set, with the SCS methods being somewhat more robust. M05-2X underbinds for the test cases considered, while the performances of DFT-D and M06-2X are similar. Density fitting, dual basis, and local correlation approximations all introduce only small errors in the interaction energies but can speed up the computations significantly, particulary when used in combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19689152     DOI: 10.1021/jp9034375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  18 in total

1.  Insights into Thiol-Aromatic Interactions: A Stereoelectronic Basis for S-H/π Interactions.

Authors:  Christina R Forbes; Sudipta K Sinha; Himal K Ganguly; Shi Bai; Glenn P A Yap; Sandeep Patel; Neal J Zondlo
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Stacking and hydrogen bond interactions between adenine and gallic acid.

Authors:  Isidro Lorenzo; Ana M Graña
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Survival of the most transferable at the top of Jacob's ladder: Defining and testing the ωB97M(2) double hybrid density functional.

Authors:  Narbe Mardirossian; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  How accurate are approximate quantum chemical methods at modelling solute-solvent interactions in solvated clusters?

Authors:  Junbo Chen; Bun Chan; Yihan Shao; Junming Ho
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  How strong is the edge effect in the adsorption of anticancer drugs on a graphene cluster?

Authors:  Chompoonut Rungnim; Rungroj Chanajaree; Thanyada Rungrotmongkol; Supot Hannongbua; Nawee Kungwan; Peter Wolschann; Alfred Karpfen; Vudhichai Parasuk
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  The BioFragment Database (BFDb): An open-data platform for computational chemistry analysis of noncovalent interactions.

Authors:  Lori A Burns; John C Faver; Zheng Zheng; Michael S Marshall; Daniel G A Smith; Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Alexander D MacKerell; Kenneth M Merz; C David Sherrill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Influence of hydrogen bonds on edge-to-face interactions between pyridine molecules.

Authors:  Jelena M Andrić; Ivana S Antonijević; Goran V Janjić; Snežana D Zarić
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Formal Estimation of Errors in Computed Absolute Interaction Energies of Protein-ligand Complexes.

Authors:  John C Faver; Mark L Benson; Xiao He; Benjamin P Roberts; Bing Wang; Michael S Marshall; Matthew R Kennedy; C David Sherrill; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  On the Binding Strength Sequence for Nucleic Acid Bases and C(60) with Density Functional and Dispersion-corrected Density Functional Theories: Whether C(60) could protect nucleic acid bases from radiation-induced damage?

Authors:  Wenming Sun; Yuxiang Bu; Yixuan Wang
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Impact of geometry optimization on base-base stacking interaction energies in the canonical A- and B-forms of DNA.

Authors:  Ashley Ringer McDonald; Elizabeth J Denning; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.