Literature DB >> 19687513

Radiologic evaluation of the insertion sites of the 2 functional bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using 3-dimensional computed tomography.

Stephan Lorenz1, Florian Elser, Martin Mitterer, Tobias Obst, Andreas B Imhoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle technique requires exact tunnel positioning. Reference values for the anatomic insertions are necessary for radiographic intra- and postoperative control and fluoroscopy-based navigation. HYPOTHESIS: The femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) of the anterior cruciate ligament can be described using standardized computed tomography scans. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: The insertion sites of the AMB and PLB were macroscopically identified and tagged by copper wire in 12 specimens. Computed tomography scans with predefined reconstructions were performed. Femorally, the geometric center of the insertions were determined in the sagittal view and described in a deep-high 10 x 10 grid. Tibially, the insertions were described as the ratio between the geometric center of the insertion sites with respect to the mediolateral and sagittal diameter of the tibia in frontal and sagittal reconstruction, respectively. The tibial insertions were described using a 10 x 10 grid in axial orientation.
RESULTS: The geometric midpoints of the insertion areas at the femur of the AMB and PLB were located on the reticule at x = 21% + or - 3% and y = 22% + or - 2% for the AMB and x = 27% + or - 3% and y = 45% + or - 3% for the PLB. In the sagittal plane, the center of the tibial insertion was located at 41% + or - 3% and 52% + or - 3% of the tibial diameter from the anterior border for the AMB and PLB, respectively. The geometric centers of the tibial insertions in axial view were x = 52% + or - 2% and y = 37% + or - 3% for the AMB and x = 50% + or - 2% and y = 48% + or - 3% for the PLB.
CONCLUSION: The insertion site characteristics of the AMB and PLB can be evaluated by predefined reconstructions of computed tomography scans. Clinical relevance These results can serve as orientation landmarks for intra- and postoperative radiographic control and fluoroscopic-based navigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19687513     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509341577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  33 in total

1.  A CT-based classification of prior ACL femoral tunnel location for planning revision ACL surgery.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Pedro Debieux; Biju Benjamin; Sébastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of tunnel placements and clinical results of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction before and after starting the use of double-bundle technique.

Authors:  Piia Suomalainen; Anna-Stina Moisala; Antti Paakkala; Pekka Kannus; Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Radiographic description of femoral tunnel placement expressed as intercondylar clock time in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Junya Yamazaki; Takeshi Muneta; Hideyuki Koga; Ichiro Sekiya; Young-Jin Ju; Toshiyuki Morito; Kazuyoshi Yagishita
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Postoperative evaluation of tibial footprint and tunnels characteristics after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomic aimers.

Authors:  Amit Sahasrabudhe; Pascal Christel; Francois Anne; David Appleby; Georges Basdekis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Variation in the shape of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament: classification is required.

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Sebastian Irarrázaval; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Cara Vernacchia; Eric Thorhauer; Volker Musahl; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Guilherme Moreira de Abreu-e-Silva; Mcbrite H G Castro Nunes de Oliveira; Gustavo Silame Maranhão; Lucas de Melo Castro Deligne; Rudolf Moreira Pfeilsticker; Eduardo Nilo Vasconcellos Novais; Tarcizo Afonso Nunes; Marco Antônio Percope de Andrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A modified quadrant method for describing the femoral tunnel aperture positions in ACL reconstruction using two-view plain radiographs.

Authors:  Masafumi Horie; Takeshi Muneta; Junya Yamazaki; Tomomasa Nakamura; Hideyuki Koga; Toshifumi Watanabe; Ichiro Sekiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Radiological evaluation for conflict of the femoral tunnel entrance area prior to anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery.

Authors:  Philippe M Tscholl; Roland M Biedert; Imre Gal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  ACL reconstruction: comparison between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques.

Authors:  Alcindo Silva; Ricardo Sampaio; Elisabete Pinto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Anatomic attachment of the ACL. Comparison between radiological and CT analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Eugène Ciobanu; Philippe Clavert; Jean-Henri Jaeger; Jean-Luc Kahn; Jean-François Kempf
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.