PURPOSE: To assess the maximum-tolerated dosages (MTDs), and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib and of intravenous (IV) irinotecan when administered together in children with refractory solid tumors. To assess the effect of gefitinib on the pharmacokinetics of IV irinotecan and on the bioavailability of a single oral dose of irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IV irinotecan (15 or 20 mg/m(2)) was given daily for 5 days of 2 consecutive weeks. Oral gefitinib (150 or 112.5 mg/m(2)) was concomitantly given daily for 12 or 21 days. A single oral dose of irinotecan was given on day 9 of course 2 to allow pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: The study enrolled 29 patients with recurrent solid tumors. The 21-day regimen of oral gefitinib with irinotecan was not tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common DLT. The MTD of the combination regimen was 15 mg/m(2)/d of IV irinotecan for 5 days of 2 consecutive weeks and 112.5 mg/m(2)/d of gefitinib given for 12 days. Gefitinib increased the bioavailability of oral irinotecan by four-fold over that observed in historical controls (median, 0.09 v 0.42; P < .000001), reducing the apparent clearance (an inverse measure of exposure) of irinotecan and SN-38 by 37% and 38%, respectively (P < .0001). A partial response was observed in a patient with refractory Ewing sarcoma. CONCLUSION: IV irinotecan given with 12 days of oral gefitinib is well tolerated in children. We observed one partial response. Gefitinib significantly enhances the bioavailability of oral irinotecan. This combination warrants further investigation, particularly with orally administered irinotecan.
PURPOSE: To assess the maximum-tolerated dosages (MTDs), and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib and of intravenous (IV) irinotecan when administered together in children with refractory solid tumors. To assess the effect of gefitinib on the pharmacokinetics of IV irinotecan and on the bioavailability of a single oral dose of irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IV irinotecan (15 or 20 mg/m(2)) was given daily for 5 days of 2 consecutive weeks. Oral gefitinib (150 or 112.5 mg/m(2)) was concomitantly given daily for 12 or 21 days. A single oral dose of irinotecan was given on day 9 of course 2 to allow pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: The study enrolled 29 patients with recurrent solid tumors. The 21-day regimen of oral gefitinib with irinotecan was not tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common DLT. The MTD of the combination regimen was 15 mg/m(2)/d of IV irinotecan for 5 days of 2 consecutive weeks and 112.5 mg/m(2)/d of gefitinib given for 12 days. Gefitinib increased the bioavailability of oral irinotecan by four-fold over that observed in historical controls (median, 0.09 v 0.42; P < .000001), reducing the apparent clearance (an inverse measure of exposure) of irinotecan and SN-38 by 37% and 38%, respectively (P < .0001). A partial response was observed in a patient with refractory Ewing sarcoma. CONCLUSION: IV irinotecan given with 12 days of oral gefitinib is well tolerated in children. We observed one partial response. Gefitinib significantly enhances the bioavailability of oral irinotecan. This combination warrants further investigation, particularly with orally administered irinotecan.
Authors: S Blaney; S L Berg; C Pratt; S Weitman; J Sullivan; L Luchtman-Jones; M Bernstein Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Maura Cosetti; Leonard H Wexler; Elizabeth Calleja; Tanya Trippett; Michael LaQuaglia; Andrew G Huvos; William Gerald; John H Healey; Paul A Meyers; Richard Gorlick Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: W L Furman; C F Stewart; C A Poquette; C B Pratt; V M Santana; W C Zamboni; L C Bowman; M K Ma; F A Hoffer; W H Meyer; A S Pappo; A W Walter; P J Houghton Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thandranese S Owens; Helen Dodds; Katrin Fricke; Suzan K Hanna; Kristine R Crews Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2003-05-05 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Lars M Wagner; Kristine R Crews; Lisa C Iacono; Peter J Houghton; Christine E Fuller; M Beth McCarville; Robert E Goldsby; Karen Albritton; Clinton F Stewart; Victor M Santana Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C M F Kruijtzer; J H Beijnen; H Rosing; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; M Schot; R C Jewell; E M Paul; J H M Schellens Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Trevor McKibbin; Wei Zhao; Michael Tagen; Najat C Daw; Wayne L Furman; Lisa M McGregor; J Russell Geyer; Jeffrey W Allen; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2010-06-04 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: R C Brennan; W Furman; S Mao; J Wu; D C Turner; C F Stewart; V Santana; L M McGregor Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Fan Zhang; Stacy L Throm; Laura L Murley; Laura A Miller; D Steven Zatechka; R Kiplin Guy; Rachel Kennedy; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Wayne L Furman; Lisa M McGregor; M Beth McCarville; Mihaela Onciu; Andrew M Davidoff; Sandy Kovach; Dana Hawkins; Valerie McPherson; Peter J Houghton; Catherine A Billups; Jianrong Wu; Clinton F Stewart; Victor M Santana Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 3.850