Literature DB >> 10561220

Direct translation of a protracted irinotecan schedule from a xenograft model to a phase I trial in children.

W L Furman1, C F Stewart, C A Poquette, C B Pratt, V M Santana, W C Zamboni, L C Bowman, M K Ma, F A Hoffer, W H Meyer, A S Pappo, A W Walter, P J Houghton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In a preclinical model of neuroblastoma, administration of irinotecan daily 5 days per week for 2 consecutive weeks ([qd x 5] x 2) resulted in greater antitumor activity than did a single 5-day course with the same total dose. We evaluated this protracted schedule in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three children with refractory solid tumors were enrolled onto a phase I study. Cohorts received irinotecan by 1-hour intravenous infusion at 20, 24, or 29 mg/m(2) (qd x 5) x 2 every 21 days.
RESULTS: The 23 children (median age, 14.1 years; median prior regimens, two) received 84 courses. Predominant diagnoses were neuroblastoma (n = 5), osteosarcoma (n = 5), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 4). The dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3/4 diarrhea and/or abdominal cramps in six of 12 patients treated at 24 mg/m(2), despite aggressive use of loperamide. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) on this schedule was 20 mg/m(2)/d. Five patients had partial responses and 16 had disease stabilization. On day 1, the median systemic exposure to SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan) at the MTD was 106 ng-h/mL (range, 41 to 421 ng-h/mL).
CONCLUSION: This protracted schedule is well tolerated in children. The absence of significant myelosuppression and encouraging clinical responses suggest compellingly that irinotecan be further evaluated in children using the (qd x 5) x 2 schedule, beginning at a dose of 20 mg/m(2). These results imply that data obtained from xenograft models can be effectively integrated into the design of clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561220     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  48 in total

Review 1.  Preclinical strategies to define predictive biomarkers for therapeutically relevant cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Marina Pajic; Christopher J Scarlett; David K Chang; Robert L Sutherland; Andrew V Biankin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Pharmacokinetic modeling to assess factors affecting the oral bioavailability of the lactone and carboxylate forms of the lipophilic camptothecin analogue AR-67 in rats.

Authors:  Eyob D Adane; Zhiwei Liu; Tian-Xiang Xiang; Bradley D Anderson; Markos Leggas
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Treatment of children with recurrent high grade gliomas with a bevacizumab containing regimen.

Authors:  Chintan Parekh; Rima Jubran; Anat Erdreich-Epstein; Ashok Panigrahy; Stefan Bluml; Jonathan Finlay; Girish Dhall
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Evaluation of cytarabine against Ewing sarcoma xenografts by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; Min Kang; C Patrick Reynolds; Catherine A Billups; Edward Favours; Debbie Payne-Turner; Chandra Tucker; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 5.  Pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  M Boyd Gillespie; David T Marshall; Terry A Day; Allen O Mitchell; David R White; Julio C Barredo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-01

6.  Increased local failure for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma on ARST0531: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Dana L Casey; Yueh-Yun Chi; Sarah S Donaldson; Douglas S Hawkins; Jing Tian; Carola A Arndt; David A Rodeberg; Jonathan C Routh; Timothy B Lautz; Abha A Gupta; Torunn I Yock; Suzanne L Wolden
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Phase I trial of oral irinotecan and temozolomide for children with relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: a new approach to neuroblastoma therapy consortium study.

Authors:  Lars M Wagner; Judith G Villablanca; Clinton F Stewart; Kristine R Crews; Susan Groshen; C Patrick Reynolds; Julie R Park; John M Maris; Randall A Hawkins; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Hollie A Jackson; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase 1 study of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a children's oncology group study.

Authors:  Lisa M McGregor; Sheri L Spunt; Wayne L Furman; Clinton F Stewart; Paula Schaiquevich; Mark D Krailo; Roseanne Speights; Percy Ivy; Peter C Adamson; Susan M Blaney
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: Soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Douglas S Hawkins; Sheri L Spunt; Stephen X Skapek
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: children's oncology group study D9803.

Authors:  Carola A S Arndt; Julie A Stoner; Douglas S Hawkins; David A Rodeberg; Andrea A Hayes-Jordan; Charles N Paidas; David M Parham; Lisa A Teot; Moody D Wharam; John C Breneman; Sarah S Donaldson; James R Anderson; William H Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.