PURPOSE: The purpose is to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide and irinotecan given on a protracted schedule in 28-day courses to pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twelve heavily pretreated patients received 56 courses of oral temozolomide at 100 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days combined with i.v. irinotecan given daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks at either 10 mg/m(2)/day (n = 6) or 15 mg/m(2)/day (n = 6). We assessed toxicity, the pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and irinotecan, and the DNA repair phenotype in tumor samples. RESULTS: Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the higher dose level; one had grade 4 diarrhea, whereas the other had bacteremia with grade 2 neutropenia. In contrast, no patient receiving temozolomide and 10 mg/m(2)/day irinotecan experienced DLT. Myelosuppression was minimal and noncumulative. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed. Drug metabolite exposures at the MTD were similar to exposures previously associated with single-agent antitumor activity. One complete response, two partial responses, and one minor response were observed in Ewing's sarcoma and neuroblastoma patients previously treated with stem cell transplant. Responding patients had low or absent O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression in tumor tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD using this schedule was temozolomide (100 mg/m(2)/day) and irinotecan (10 mg/m(2)/day), with DLT being diarrhea and infection. Drug clearance was similar to single-agent values, and clinically relevant SN-38 lactone and MTIC exposures were achieved at the MTD. As predicted by xenograft models, this combination and schedule appears to be tolerable and active in pediatric solid tumors. Evaluation of a 21-day schedule is planned.
PURPOSE: The purpose is to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide and irinotecan given on a protracted schedule in 28-day courses to pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twelve heavily pretreated patients received 56 courses of oral temozolomide at 100 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days combined with i.v. irinotecan given daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks at either 10 mg/m(2)/day (n = 6) or 15 mg/m(2)/day (n = 6). We assessed toxicity, the pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and irinotecan, and the DNA repair phenotype in tumor samples. RESULTS: Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the higher dose level; one had grade 4 diarrhea, whereas the other had bacteremia with grade 2 neutropenia. In contrast, no patient receiving temozolomide and 10 mg/m(2)/day irinotecan experienced DLT. Myelosuppression was minimal and noncumulative. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed. Drug metabolite exposures at the MTD were similar to exposures previously associated with single-agent antitumor activity. One complete response, two partial responses, and one minor response were observed in Ewing's sarcoma and neuroblastomapatients previously treated with stem cell transplant. Responding patients had low or absent O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression in tumor tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD using this schedule was temozolomide (100 mg/m(2)/day) and irinotecan (10 mg/m(2)/day), with DLT being diarrhea and infection. Drug clearance was similar to single-agent values, and clinically relevant SN-38 lactone and MTIC exposures were achieved at the MTD. As predicted by xenograft models, this combination and schedule appears to be tolerable and active in pediatric solid tumors. Evaluation of a 21-day schedule is planned.
Authors: Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; Min Kang; C Patrick Reynolds; Catherine A Billups; Edward Favours; Debbie Payne-Turner; Chandra Tucker; Malcolm A Smith Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: R C Brennan; W Furman; S Mao; J Wu; D C Turner; C F Stewart; V Santana; L M McGregor Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Steven G DuBois; Yael P Mosse; Elizabeth Fox; Rachel A Kudgus; Joel M Reid; Renee McGovern; Susan Groshen; Rochelle Bagatell; John M Maris; Clare J Twist; Kelly Goldsmith; M Meaghan Granger; Brian Weiss; Julie R Park; Margaret E Macy; Susan L Cohn; Greg Yanik; Lars M Wagner; Randall Hawkins; Jesse Courtier; Hollie Lai; Fariba Goodarzian; Hiroyuki Shimada; Najee Boucher; Scarlett Czarnecki; Chunqiao Luo; Denice Tsao-Wei; Katherine K Matthay; Araz Marachelian Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lars M Wagner; Judith G Villablanca; Clinton F Stewart; Kristine R Crews; Susan Groshen; C Patrick Reynolds; Julie R Park; John M Maris; Randall A Hawkins; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Hollie A Jackson; Katherine K Matthay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Darren Hargrave; Birgit Geoerger; Didier Frappaz; Torsten Pietsch; Lyle Gesner; Laura Cisar; Aurora Breazna; Andrew Dorman; Ofelia Cruz-Martinez; Jose Luis Fuster; Xavier Rialland; Céline Icher; Pierre Leblond; David Ashley; Giorgio Perilongo; Martin Elliott; Martin English; Niels Clausen; Jacques Grill Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 4.130