Literature DB >> 14871959

Phase I trial of temozolomide and protracted irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.

Lars M Wagner1, Kristine R Crews, Lisa C Iacono, Peter J Houghton, Christine E Fuller, M Beth McCarville, Robert E Goldsby, Karen Albritton, Clinton F Stewart, Victor M Santana.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose is to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide and irinotecan given on a protracted schedule in 28-day courses to pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Twelve heavily pretreated patients received 56 courses of oral temozolomide at 100 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days combined with i.v. irinotecan given daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks at either 10 mg/m(2)/day (n = 6) or 15 mg/m(2)/day (n = 6). We assessed toxicity, the pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and irinotecan, and the DNA repair phenotype in tumor samples.
RESULTS: Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the higher dose level; one had grade 4 diarrhea, whereas the other had bacteremia with grade 2 neutropenia. In contrast, no patient receiving temozolomide and 10 mg/m(2)/day irinotecan experienced DLT. Myelosuppression was minimal and noncumulative. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed. Drug metabolite exposures at the MTD were similar to exposures previously associated with single-agent antitumor activity. One complete response, two partial responses, and one minor response were observed in Ewing's sarcoma and neuroblastoma patients previously treated with stem cell transplant. Responding patients had low or absent O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression in tumor tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: The MTD using this schedule was temozolomide (100 mg/m(2)/day) and irinotecan (10 mg/m(2)/day), with DLT being diarrhea and infection. Drug clearance was similar to single-agent values, and clinically relevant SN-38 lactone and MTIC exposures were achieved at the MTD. As predicted by xenograft models, this combination and schedule appears to be tolerable and active in pediatric solid tumors. Evaluation of a 21-day schedule is planned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14871959     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-03-0175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  33 in total

1.  Evaluation of cytarabine against Ewing sarcoma xenografts by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; Min Kang; C Patrick Reynolds; Catherine A Billups; Edward Favours; Debbie Payne-Turner; Chandra Tucker; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 2.  Novel therapeutic approaches in pediatric and young adult sarcomas.

Authors:  Peter M Anderson; Margaret Pearson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral gefitinib and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors.

Authors:  R C Brennan; W Furman; S Mao; J Wu; D C Turner; C F Stewart; V Santana; L M McGregor
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Phase II Trial of Alisertib in Combination with Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Steven G DuBois; Yael P Mosse; Elizabeth Fox; Rachel A Kudgus; Joel M Reid; Renee McGovern; Susan Groshen; Rochelle Bagatell; John M Maris; Clare J Twist; Kelly Goldsmith; M Meaghan Granger; Brian Weiss; Julie R Park; Margaret E Macy; Susan L Cohn; Greg Yanik; Lars M Wagner; Randall Hawkins; Jesse Courtier; Hollie Lai; Fariba Goodarzian; Hiroyuki Shimada; Najee Boucher; Scarlett Czarnecki; Chunqiao Luo; Denice Tsao-Wei; Katherine K Matthay; Araz Marachelian
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Improving outcomes in difficult bone cancers using multimodality therapy, including radiation: physician and nursing perspectives.

Authors:  Pete Anderson; Maritza Salazar-Abshire
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Phase I trial of oral irinotecan and temozolomide for children with relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: a new approach to neuroblastoma therapy consortium study.

Authors:  Lars M Wagner; Judith G Villablanca; Clinton F Stewart; Kristine R Crews; Susan Groshen; C Patrick Reynolds; Julie R Park; John M Maris; Randall A Hawkins; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Hollie A Jackson; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A phase II single-arm study of irinotecan in combination with temozolomide (TEMIRI) in children with newly diagnosed high grade glioma: a joint ITCC and SIOPE-brain tumour study.

Authors:  Darren Hargrave; Birgit Geoerger; Didier Frappaz; Torsten Pietsch; Lyle Gesner; Laura Cisar; Aurora Breazna; Andrew Dorman; Ofelia Cruz-Martinez; Jose Luis Fuster; Xavier Rialland; Céline Icher; Pierre Leblond; David Ashley; Giorgio Perilongo; Martin Elliott; Martin English; Niels Clausen; Jacques Grill
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Emerging chemotherapeutic strategies and the role of treatment stratification in Ewing sarcoma.

Authors:  Beatrice M Seddon; Jeremy S Whelan
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Chemotherapy in Ewing's sarcoma.

Authors:  Sandeep Jain; Gauri Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Targeted Therapy of Ewing's Sarcoma.

Authors:  Vivek Subbiah; Pete Anderson
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2010-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.