Literature DB >> 19687109

Psychometric evaluation of the Health Information Orientation Scale: a brief measure for assessing health information engagement and apprehension.

Lori L DuBenske1, Ellen Burke Beckjord, Robert P Hawkins, David H Gustafson.   

Abstract

The Health Information Orientation Scale (HIOS) was developed from a need to briefly assess information orientation in a health context and underlying reasons for information seeking or avoidance. Using data from a larger longitudinal study of informal cancer caregivers, this study examines psychometric properties of the HIOS, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability and construct validity through associations with information competence, coping and distress. CFA supported two conceptually unique factors: Information Engagement and Information Apprehension. Each factor demonstrated adequate reliability and construct validity, providing promising findings regarding Information Engagement and Information Apprehension, specific to a health context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19687109      PMCID: PMC2729509          DOI: 10.1177/1359105309338892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  24 in total

1.  The effect on coping of monitoring, blunting, and the ability to achieve cognitive structure.

Authors:  Y Bar-Tal; A Spitzer
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Coping and depression in Alzheimer's caregivers: longitudinal evidence of stability.

Authors:  David V Powers; Dolores Gallagher-Thompson; Helena C Kraemer
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Prevalence and predictors of depression and anxiety-related disorders during the year after heart transplantation.

Authors:  M A Dew; L H Roth; H C Schulberg; R G Simmons; R L Kormos; P T Trzepacz; B P Griffith
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 4.  Science and society: the communications revolution and cancer control.

Authors:  K Viswanath
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  The flat-pack patient? Creating health together.

Authors:  Harry Cayton
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-07-27

6.  Health disparities, communication inequalities, and eHealth.

Authors:  K Viswanath; Matthew W Kreuter
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system.

Authors:  D H Gustafson; R Hawkins; E Boberg; S Pingree; R E Serlin; F Graziano; C L Chan
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE.

Authors:  C S Carver
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  1997

9.  Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat.

Authors:  S M Miller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-02

10.  Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer.

Authors:  D H Gustafson; R Hawkins; S Pingree; F McTavish; N K Arora; J Mendenhall; D F Cella; R C Serlin; F M Apantaku; J Stewart; A Salner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  11 in total

1.  Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research.

Authors:  Ingrid A Holm; Brittany R Iles; Sonja I Ziniel; Phoebe L Bacon; Sarah K Savage; Kurt D Christensen; Elissa R Weitzman; Robert C Green; Noelle L Huntington
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  The Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale: A validation study.

Authors:  Teresa L Hagan; Susan M Cohen; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Kristin Zorn; Clement A Stone; Heidi S Donovan
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Tia L Kauffman; Laura M Amendola; Katherine P Anderson; Barbara B Biesecker; Michael O Dorschner; Devan M Duenas; Donna J Eubanks; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Marian J Gilmore; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Galen Joseph; Stephanie A Kraft; Sandra Soo Jin Lee; Michael C Leo; Elizabeth G Liles; Nangel M Lindberg; Kristin R Muessig; Sonia Okuyama; Kathryn M Porter; Leslie S Riddle; Bradley A Rolf; Alan F Rope; Jamilyn M Zepp; Gail P Jarvik; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.261

4.  Impact of a Patient-Facing Enhanced Genomic Results Report to Improve Understanding, Engagement, and Communication.

Authors:  Janet L Williams; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Doris T Zallen; Heather Stuckey; Kara Fultz; Audrey L Fan; Michele Bonhag; Lynn Feldman; Michael M Segal; Marc S Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Patients' preimplantation genetic testing decision-making experience: an opinion on related psychological frameworks.

Authors:  L M Pastore; C N Cordeiro Mitchell; L R Rubin; J Nicoloro-SantaBarbara; M C Genoff Garzon; M Lobel
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2019-10-04

6.  Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 - Application of theory of planned behavior model.

Authors:  Jing Yu Pan; Dahai Liu
Journal:  Transp Policy (Oxf)       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 7.  Social and behavioral research in genomic sequencing: approaches from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium Outcomes and Measures Working Group.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Yolanda Martins; Lindsay Z Feuerman; Barbara A Bernhardt; Barbara B Biesecker; Kurt D Christensen; Steven Joffe; Christine Rini; David Veenstra; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Design of a randomized controlled trial for genomic carrier screening in healthy patients seeking preconception genetic testing.

Authors:  Tia L Kauffman; Benjamin S Wilfond; Gail P Jarvik; Michael C Leo; Frances L Lynch; Jacob A Reiss; C Sue Richards; Carmit McMullen; Deborah Nickerson; Michael O Dorschner; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Pediatric reporting of genomic results study (PROGRESS): a mixed-methods, longitudinal, observational cohort study protocol to explore disclosure of actionable adult- and pediatric-onset genomic variants to minors and their parents.

Authors:  Juliann M Savatt; Jennifer K Wagner; Steven Joffe; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Marc S Williams; Angela R Bradbury; F Daniel Davis; Julie Hergenrather; Yirui Hu; Melissa A Kelly; H Lester Kirchner; Michelle N Meyer; Jessica Mozersky; Sean M O'Dell; Josie Pervola; Andrea Seeley; Amy C Sturm; Adam H Buchanan
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Understanding Midwives' Preferences for Providing Information About Newborn Bloodspot Screening.

Authors:  Stuart James Wright; Fiona Ulph; Tina Lavender; Nimarta Dharni; Katherine Payne
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2018-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.