Literature DB >> 19684447

Integrating human papillomavirus vaccination in cervical cancer control programmes.

Eduardo L Franco1, François Coutlée, Alex Ferenczy.   

Abstract

Screening with Pap cytology has substantially reduced cervical cancer morbidity and mortality during the last 50 years in high-income countries. Unfortunately, in resource-poor countries, Pap screening has either not been effectively implemented or has failed to reduce cervical cancer rates. Cervical cancer in these countries thus remains a major public health problem. Infection with certain human papillomavirus (HPV) types is now recognized as a necessary cause of this disease and has led to new preventive strategies for cervical cancer. Testing for HPV DNA of oncogenic types is gaining increasing interest and application in cervical cancer screening. It has much greater sensitivity and only slightly lower specificity than Pap cytology. Molecular-based screening will be of particular clinical value in the post-vaccine era in which cervical disease will be a rare event and may escape cytology-based detection. As a primary screening test followed by Pap triage of HPV-positive cases, HPV testing has the potential to improve the overall quality of screening programmes, thus allowing for increased testing intervals, which would lower program costs with acceptable safety. Prophylactic vaccines against the 2 leading oncogenic HPV types (16 and 18) have been recently licensed. In large clinical trials, they have shown excellent safety and nearly 100% efficacy in preventing persistent infections and the cervical pre-cancers due to vaccine HPV types 16 and 18. Combining modern screening techniques and universal prophylactic HPV vaccination is likely to produce the most advanced and cost-effective preventive strategy to fight cervical cancer worldwide. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19684447     DOI: 10.1159/000214925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  8 in total

1.  Physical after effects and clients satisfaction following colposcopy and cervical biopsy in a Nigerian population.

Authors:  C A Okonkwo; M C Ezeanochie; B N Olagbuji
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Richardson; Joseph Tota; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05

Review 3.  Immunomodulatory effects of dsRNA and its potential as vaccine adjuvant.

Authors:  Bo Jin; Tao Sun; Xiao-Hong Yu; Chao-Qun Liu; Ying-Xiang Yang; Ping Lu; Shan-Feng Fu; Hui-Bin Qiu; Anthony E T Yeo
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-05

4.  Barriers to Cervical Screening Among Sex Workers in Vancouver.

Authors:  Putu Duff; Gina Ogilvie; Jean Shoveller; Ofer Amram; Jill Chettiar; Paul Nguyen; Sabina Dobrer; Julio Montaner; Kate Shannon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Global challenges of implementing human papillomavirus vaccines.

Authors:  Janice E Graham; Amrita Mishra
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2011-06-30

6.  Cervical precancerous changes and selected cervical microbial infections, Kiambu County, Kenya, 2014: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Evalyne Wambui Kanyina; Lucy Kamau; Margaret Muturi
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Estimating the direct effect of human papillomavirus vaccination on the lifetime risk of screen-detected cervical precancer.

Authors:  Federica Inturrisi; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Nienke J Veldhuijzen; Johannes A Bogaards; Guglielmo Ronco; Chris J L M Meijer; Johannes Berkhof
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Intent to participate in future cervical cancer screenings is lower when satisfaction with the decision to be vaccinated is neutral.

Authors:  Natalie Marya Alexander; Diane Medved Harper; Johanna Claire Comes; Melissa Smith Smith; Melinda Ann Heutinck; Sandra Martin Handley; Debra Ann Ahern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.