Literature DB >> 32663316

Estimating the direct effect of human papillomavirus vaccination on the lifetime risk of screen-detected cervical precancer.

Federica Inturrisi1, Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte1, Nienke J Veldhuijzen1,2, Johannes A Bogaards1,3, Guglielmo Ronco4, Chris J L M Meijer5, Johannes Berkhof1.   

Abstract

Birth cohorts vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) are now entering cervical cancer screening. Assessment of (pre)cancer (CIN3+) risk is needed to assess the residual screening need in vaccinated women. We estimated the lifetime (screen-detected) CIN3+ risk under five-yearly primary HPV screening between age 30 and 60, using HPV genotyping and histology data of 21,287 women participating in a screening trial with two HPV-based screening rounds, 5 years apart. The maximum follow-up after an HPV-positive test was 9 years. We re-estimated the CIN3+ risk after projecting direct vaccine efficacy for the bivalent and the nonavalent HPV vaccines, assuming life-long protection. The lifetime CIN3+ risk was 4.1% (95% confidence interval 3.5-4.9) and declined by 53.5% and 70.5% after bivalent vaccination without and with cross-protection, respectively, translating into a residual lifetime CIN3+ risk of 1.9% (1.4-2.4) and 1.2% (0.9-1.5). The CIN3+ risk declined by 88.5% after nonavalent vaccination, translating into a residual lifetime CIN3+ risk of 0.5% (0.2-0.7). The latter risk increased to 1.6% when vaccine protection only lasted until the first screening round at age 30. Among HPV-positive women with abnormal adjunct cytology, the nine-year CIN3+ risk was 16.9% (8.7-32.4) after nonavalent vaccination. In conclusion, HPV vaccination will lead to a strong decline in the lifetime CIN3+ risk and the remaining absolute CIN3+ risk will be very low. Primary HPV testing combined with adjunct cytology at five-year intervals still seems feasible even after nonavalent vaccination, although unlikely to be cost-effective. Our results support a de-intensification of screening programs in settings with high vaccination coverage.
© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Union for International Cancer Control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV-based screening; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); human papillomavirus (HPV); lifetime risk; prophylactic vaccination

Year:  2020        PMID: 32663316      PMCID: PMC7754437          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  47 in total

1.  FDA approves Gardasil 9 for more types of HPV.

Authors:  Carrie Printz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Margaret R E McCredie; Katrina J Sharples; Charlotte Paul; Judith Baranyai; Gabriele Medley; Ronald W Jones; David C G Skegg
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Risk assessment to guide the prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Mario Sideri; Jose Jeronimo; Diane Solomon; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway.

Authors:  E A Burger; J D Ortendahl; S Sy; I S Kristiansen; J J Kim
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Sustained efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine: final analysis of a long-term follow-up study up to 9.4 years post-vaccination.

Authors:  Paulo S Naud; Cecilia M Roteli-Martins; Newton S De Carvalho; Julio C Teixeira; Paola C de Borba; Nervo Sanchez; Toufik Zahaf; Gregory Catteau; Brecht Geeraerts; Dominique Descamps
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Bivalent Vaccine Effectiveness Against Type-Specific HPV Positivity: Evidence for Cross-Protection Against Oncogenic Types Among Dutch STI Clinic Visitors.

Authors:  Petra J Woestenberg; Audrey J King; Birgit H B van Benthem; Robine Donken; Suzan Leussink; Fiona R M van der Klis; Hester E de Melker; Marianne A B van der Sande; Christian J P A Hoebe; Johannes A Bogaards
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Impact of HPV vaccination on cervical screening performance: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Jiayao Lei; Alexander Ploner; Matti Lehtinen; Pär Sparén; Joakim Dillner; K Miriam Elfström
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Estimating the direct effect of human papillomavirus vaccination on the lifetime risk of screen-detected cervical precancer.

Authors:  Federica Inturrisi; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Nienke J Veldhuijzen; Johannes A Bogaards; Guglielmo Ronco; Chris J L M Meijer; Johannes Berkhof
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Changes in the prevalence of human papillomavirus following a national bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination programme in Scotland: a 7-year cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kimberley Kavanagh; Kevin G Pollock; Kate Cuschieri; Tim Palmer; Ross L Cameron; Cameron Watt; Ramya Bhatia; Catherine Moore; Heather Cubie; Margaret Cruickshank; Chris Robertson
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 25.071

10.  Use of HPV testing for cervical screening in vaccinated women--Insights from the SHEVa (Scottish HPV Prevalence in Vaccinated Women) study.

Authors:  Ramya Bhatia; Kimberley Kavanagh; Heather Ann Cubie; Itziar Serrano; Holli Wennington; Mark Hopkins; Jiafeng Pan; Kevin G Pollock; Tim J Palmer; Kate Cuschieri
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cervical cancer screening guidelines and screening practices in 11 countries: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Emanuele Arcà; Anushua Sinha; Kristina Hartl; Natalie Houwing; Smita Kothari
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-05-08

2.  Estimating the direct effect of human papillomavirus vaccination on the lifetime risk of screen-detected cervical precancer.

Authors:  Federica Inturrisi; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Nienke J Veldhuijzen; Johannes A Bogaards; Guglielmo Ronco; Chris J L M Meijer; Johannes Berkhof
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 3.  Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination.

Authors:  Kendal Rosalik; Christopher Tarney; Jasmine Han
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.048

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.