Literature DB >> 19684298

Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods.

Dean C Taylor1, Thomas M DeBerardino, Bradley J Nelson, Michele Duffey, Joachim Tenuta, Paul D Stoneman, Rodney X Sturdivant, Sally Mountcastle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains over the most appropriate graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: There is no significant difference in outcomes after 4-strand hamstring and patellar tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using similar fixation techniques. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS: Between August 2000 and May 2003, 64 Keller Army Hospital patients with complete anterior cruciate ligament tears were randomized to hamstring (n = 32) or patellar tendon (n = 32) autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Operative graft fixation and rehabilitative techniques were the same for both groups. Follow-up assessments included the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed for tunnel location and orientation.
RESULTS: Eleven women and 53 men were randomized. Eighty-three percent of the patients (53 of 64) had follow-up of greater than 2 years, or to the point of graft rupture or removal (average follow-up, 36 months). Four hamstring grafts (12.5%) and three patellar tendon grafts (9.4%) (P = .71) ruptured. One deep infection in a hamstring graft patient necessitated graft removal. Forty-five of the 56 patients with intact grafts had greater than 2-year follow-up. Patients with patellar tendon grafts had greater Tegner activity scores (P = .04). Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores were 88.5 (95% confidence interval: 83.1, 93.8) and 90.1 (95% confidence interval: 85.2, 96.1) for the hamstring and patellar tendon groups, respectively (P = .53). Lysholm scores were 90.3 (95% confidence interval: 84.4, 96.1) and 90.4 (95% confidence interval: 84.5, 96.3) for the hamstring and patellar tendon groups, respectively (P = .97). There were no significant differences in knee laxity, kneeling pain, isokinetic peak torque, International Knee Documentation Committee score, or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores. Postoperative graft rupture correlated with more horizontal tibial tunnel orientation.
CONCLUSION: Hamstring and patellar tendon autografts provide similar objective, subjective, and functional outcomes when assessed at least 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19684298     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509339577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  29 in total

Review 1.  Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Olufemi R Ayeni; Manraj Chahal; Michael N Tran; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Electromyographic analysis of the knee using fixed-activation threshold after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mario Kasović; Mladen Mejovšek; Branka Matković; Saša Janković; Anton Tudor
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Minimally invasive posterior hamstring harvest.

Authors:  Trent J Wilson; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-08-16

4.  Physiotherapy after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Maitê Pereira; Neiva de Souza Vieira; Eduardo da Rosa Brandão; João Afonso Ruaro; Rodrigo Juliano Grignet; Andersom Ricardo Fréz
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 5.  Credibility and quality of meta-analyses addressing graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adrian Kurz; Nathan Evaniew; Marco Yeung; Kristian Samuelsson; Devin Peterson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Isokinetic muscle strength and knee function associated with double femoral pin fixation and fixation with interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Tiago Lazzaretti Fernandes; Thiago Rocha Protta; Felipe Fregni; Raul Bolliger Neto; André Pedrinelli; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Arnaldo José Hernandez
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A two- and five-year follow-up of clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction using BPTB or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective intervention outcome study.

Authors:  Annette Heijne; Maria Hagströmer; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The Development and Early to Midterm Findings of the Multicenter Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Cortical femoral suspensory fixation using screw post in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study and mid-term outcome results.

Authors:  Ashraf Abdelkafy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Functional performance 2-9 years after ACL reconstruction: cross-sectional comparison between athletes with bone-patellar tendon-bone, semitendinosus/gracilis and healthy controls.

Authors:  Nicky Engelen-van Melick; Robert E H van Cingel; Tony G van Tienen; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.