Literature DB >> 26404563

Functional performance 2-9 years after ACL reconstruction: cross-sectional comparison between athletes with bone-patellar tendon-bone, semitendinosus/gracilis and healthy controls.

Nicky Engelen-van Melick1,2, Robert E H van Cingel3,4, Tony G van Tienen5, Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to provide descriptive data on functional performance in men and women with ACLR, to compare bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) with semitendinosus/gracilis (STG) within the same sex and to compare the ACLR subjects with healthy controls.
METHODS: Eligible participants comprised 100 men (43 % BPTB) and 84 women (41 % BPTB) after ACLR, of whom 30 men (STG n = 19; BPTB n = 11) and 18 women (STG n = 12; BPTB n = 6) were untraceable/not willing and 15 men (STG n = 9; BPTB n = 6) and 18 women (STG n = 12; BPTB n = 3) were not able to take part in the measurements because of injury. Besides men BPTB (n = 24), men STG (n = 27), women BPTB (n = 23) and women STG (n = 23), healthy men (n = 22) and women (n = 22) participated. Measurements consisted of questionnaires, isokinetic peak torque and endurance tests, a hop test battery and drop jump including video analysis.
RESULTS: Only the occurrence of dynamic knee valgus differed between ACLR and healthy subjects.
CONCLUSION: Two to nine years after ACLR, 16 % of athletes could not participate because of a lower extremity injury. In the remaining group, this study showed similar results for males and females with BPTB compared with STG. Also, similar results are found for quantity of movement comparing operated and healthy subjects. For quality of movement, only the occurrence of dynamic knee valgus in landing from a jump is higher in operated subjects compared with healthy controls. This supports the relevance of a focus on quality of movement as part of ACLR rehabilitation programmes and return to sports criteria. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Functional performance; Quality of movement; Quantity of movement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26404563     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3801-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  57 in total

1.  Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes.

Authors:  Darin T Leetun; Mary Lloyd Ireland; John D Willson; Bryon T Ballantyne; Irene McClay Davis
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Objective criteria for return to athletics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and subsequent reinjury rates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sue D Barber-Westin; Frank R Noyes
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; John Bergfeld; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Michelle Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Thigh muscle activity and anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency.

Authors:  Z Dvir; G Eger; N Halperin; A Shklar
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Return to sport.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lucy Salmon; Vivianne Russell; Tim Musgrove; Leo Pinczewski; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Lower extremity compensatory neuromuscular and biomechanical adaptations 2 to 11 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  John Nyland; Scott Klein; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Reliability of 2-dimensional video assessment of frontal-plane dynamic knee valgus during common athletic screening tasks.

Authors:  Allan Munro; Lee Herrington; Michael Carolan
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 1.931

9.  Quadriceps and hamstrings fatigue alters hip and knee mechanics.

Authors:  Abbey C Thomas; Scott G McLean; Riann M Palmieri-Smith
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.833

10.  Return to play and future ACL injury risk after ACL reconstruction in soccer athletes from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) group.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; Leah Schmitz; Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Richard D Parker; Jack T Andrish; Eric C McCarty; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  5 in total

1.  Return to sports after ACL reconstruction: a paradigm shift from time to function.

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Christian Fink; Sebastian Kopf
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Lower Limb Biomechanics During Single-Leg Landings Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peta T Johnston; Jodie A McClelland; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Research at the Point of Care: Using Electronic Medical Record Systems to Generate Clinically Meaningful Evidence.

Authors:  Ashley N Marshall; Kenneth C Lam
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults.

Authors:  Nicky van Melick; Bart M Meddeler; Thomas J Hoogeboom; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Robert E H van Cingel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quantification of Triple Single-Leg Hop Test Temporospatial Parameters: A Validated Method using Body-Worn Sensors for Functional Evaluation after Knee Injury.

Authors:  Niloufar Ahmadian; Milad Nazarahari; Jackie L Whittaker; Hossein Rouhani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.