PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the ability of the genotyping microarray for Usher syndrome (USH) to identify the mutations responsible for the disease in a cohort of 183 patients with USH. METHODS: DNA from 183 patients with Usher syndrome from the Spanish population was analyzed using a genotyping microarray containing 429 previously identified disease-associated variants in eight USH genes. Mutations detected by the array were confirmed by direct sequencing. Haplotype analysis was also performed in families carrying common Spanish mutations. RESULTS: The genotyping microarray identified 43 different variants, divided into 32 disease causative and 11 probably nonpathologic. Mutations were detected in 62 patients with USH (33.9%). According to the clinical classification of patients, pathologic variants were detected in 31.4% patients with USH1, 39.4% of with USH2, 22.2% with USH3 and 15.8% with unclassified Usher syndrome. Ninety-seven pathologic alleles were detected, corresponding to 26.5% of expected alleles. The USH2A mutations p.C3267R and p.T3571M were revealed as common in the Spanish population, and two major haplotypes linked to these mutations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The genotyping microarray is a robust, low-cost, rapid technique that is effective for the genetic study of patients with USH. However, it also indicates variants of unclear pathologic nature and detection failures have also been observed. Results must be confirmed by direct sequencing to avoid misdiagnosis, and continuous updates of the microarray should be performed to increase the efficiency and rate of detection of mutations.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the ability of the genotyping microarray for Usher syndrome (USH) to identify the mutations responsible for the disease in a cohort of 183 patients with USH. METHODS: DNA from 183 patients with Usher syndrome from the Spanish population was analyzed using a genotyping microarray containing 429 previously identified disease-associated variants in eight USH genes. Mutations detected by the array were confirmed by direct sequencing. Haplotype analysis was also performed in families carrying common Spanish mutations. RESULTS: The genotyping microarray identified 43 different variants, divided into 32 disease causative and 11 probably nonpathologic. Mutations were detected in 62 patients with USH (33.9%). According to the clinical classification of patients, pathologic variants were detected in 31.4% patients with USH1, 39.4% of with USH2, 22.2% with USH3 and 15.8% with unclassified Usher syndrome. Ninety-seven pathologic alleles were detected, corresponding to 26.5% of expected alleles. The USH2A mutations p.C3267R and p.T3571M were revealed as common in the Spanish population, and two major haplotypes linked to these mutations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The genotyping microarray is a robust, low-cost, rapid technique that is effective for the genetic study of patients with USH. However, it also indicates variants of unclear pathologic nature and detection failures have also been observed. Results must be confirmed by direct sequencing to avoid misdiagnosis, and continuous updates of the microarray should be performed to increase the efficiency and rate of detection of mutations.
Authors: Gema Garcia-Garcia; Maria J Aparisi; Teresa Jaijo; Regina Rodrigo; Ana M Leon; Almudena Avila-Fernandez; Fiona Blanco-Kelly; Sara Bernal; Rafael Navarro; Manuel Diaz-Llopis; Montserrat Baiget; Carmen Ayuso; Jose M Millan; Elena Aller Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Kinga M Bujakowska; Mark Consugar; Emily Place; Shyana Harper; Jaclyn Lena; Daniel G Taub; Joseph White; Daniel Navarro-Gomez; Carol Weigel DiFranco; Michael H Farkas; Xiaowu Gai; Eliot L Berson; Eric A Pierce Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Marta Molina Romero; Alberto Yoldi Chaure; Miguel Gañán Parra; Purificación Navas Bastida; José Luis Del Pico Sánchez; Ángel Vaquero Argüelles; Paloma de la Fuente Vaquero; Juan Pablo Ramírez López; José Antonio Castilla Alcalá Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Rahul Mittal; Amit P Patel; Desiree Nguyen; Debbie R Pan; Vasanti M Jhaveri; Jason R Rudman; Arjuna Dharmaraja; Denise Yan; Yong Feng; Prem Chapagain; David J Lee; Susan H Blanton; Xue Zhong Liu Journal: Gene Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 3.688
Authors: Polona Le Quesne Stabej; Zubin Saihan; Nell Rangesh; Heather B Steele-Stallard; John Ambrose; Alison Coffey; Jenny Emmerson; Elene Haralambous; Yasmin Hughes; Karen P Steel; Linda M Luxon; Andrew R Webster; Maria Bitner-Glindzicz Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: María José Aparisi; Gema García-García; Elena Aller; María Dolores Sequedo; Cristina Martínez-Fernández de la Cámara; Regina Rodrigo; Miguel Armengot; Julio Cortijo; Javier Milara; Manuel Díaz-LLopis; Teresa Jaijo; José María Millán Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Heather B Steele-Stallard; Polona Le Quesne Stabej; Eva Lenassi; Linda M Luxon; Mireille Claustres; Anne-Francoise Roux; Andrew R Webster; Maria Bitner-Glindzicz Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 4.123