Literature DB >> 23451239

Study of USH1 splicing variants through minigenes and transcript analysis from nasal epithelial cells.

María José Aparisi1, Gema García-García, Elena Aller, María Dolores Sequedo, Cristina Martínez-Fernández de la Cámara, Regina Rodrigo, Miguel Armengot, Julio Cortijo, Javier Milara, Manuel Díaz-LLopis, Teresa Jaijo, José María Millán.   

Abstract

Usher syndrome type I (USH1) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by congenital profound deafness, vestibular areflexia and prepubertal retinitis pigmentosa. The first purpose of this study was to determine the pathologic nature of eighteen USH1 putative splicing variants found in our series and their effect in the splicing process by minigene assays. These variants were selected according to bioinformatic analysis. The second aim was to analyze the USH1 transcripts, obtained from nasal epithelial cells samples of our patients, in order to corroborate the observed effect of mutations by minigenes in patient's tissues. The last objective was to evaluate the nasal ciliary beat frequency in patients with USH1 and compare it with control subjects. In silico analysis were performed using four bioinformatic programs: NNSplice, Human Splicing Finder, NetGene2 and Spliceview. Afterward, minigenes based on the pSPL3 vector were used to investigate the implication of selected changes in the mRNA processing. To observe the effect of mutations in the patient's tissues, RNA was extracted from nasal epithelial cells and RT-PCR analyses were performed. Four MYO7A (c.470G>A, c.1342_1343delAG, c.5856G>A and c.3652G>A), three CDH23 (c.2289+1G>A, c.6049G>A and c.8722+1delG) and one PCDH15 (c.3717+2dupTT) variants were observed to affect the splicing process by minigene assays and/or transcripts analysis obtained from nasal cells. Based on our results, minigenes are a good approach to determine the implication of identified variants in the mRNA processing, and the analysis of RNA obtained from nasal epithelial cells is an alternative method to discriminate neutral Usher variants from those with a pathogenic effect on the splicing process. In addition, we could observe that the nasal ciliated epithelium of USH1 patients shows a lower ciliary beat frequency than control subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23451239      PMCID: PMC3581446          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Usher syndrome (USH) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by sensorineural hearing loss, retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and variable vestibular dysfunction. USH is clinically and genetically heterogeneous and is the most common form of deaf-blindness of genetic origin, representing 50% of cases [1]. This disease shows a prevalence of 3.2–6.2/100000 [2], [3], [4]. Three clinical types of USH (types I, II and III; USH1, USH2 and USH3) are recognized, mainly on the basis of the severity and progression of hearing loss, the age of onset of RP and the presence of vestibular dysfunction [5]. Usher syndrome type I (USH1) is the most severe form of the disease and it is characterized by congenital profound deafness, vestibular areflexia and prepubertal onset of retinitis pigmentosa. To date, nine loci (USH1B-USH1K) have been mapped and six genes have been identified: MYO7A (USH1B): MIM#276903; USH1C (USH1C): MIM# 605242; CDH23 (USH1D): MIM# 605516; PCDH15 (USH1F): MIM# 605514; USH1G (USH1G): MIM# 607696; and CIB2 (USH1J): MIM# 605564 [reviewed in 6], [7], [8]. Many mutations in MYO7A, USH1C, CDH23, PCDH15 and USH1G have been identified by several screenings performed in USH1 patients (http://grenada.lumc.nl/LOVD2/Usher_montpellier/). The consequences of missense, silent and intronic changes many times are unknown and additional studies are needed to know the pathogenicity of these variants. The use of minigene assays has been shown to be a useful approach to determine the effect of these variants on the splicing process, when genes present a restricted expression profile (photoreceptors and inner hair cells, in the case of USH) and human specific tissue samples are difficult to obtain [9]. Cohn et al. [10] demonstrated the presence of eight Usher proteins in nasal ciliated epithelium using immunochemistry with fluorescent antibodies. Subsequently, Vaché et al. [11] provided evidence that splicing mutations occurring in most USH genes can be identified through ex vivo analysis of mRNA from nasal epithelial cells. On the other hand, the cilium in photoreceptors appears ultrastructurally and molecularly very similar to the nasal ciliated epithelium. The cilia are distributed around the human body and it has been reported that an abnormality in ciliary function may be linked to the nasal cilia abnormalities, as well as to the retinal degeneration [12]. There is evidence that immotiles nasal cilial can be associated with USH1 [13]. In our cohort of patients, we identified different pathogenic variants and some putative splicing mutations in USH1 genes [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. The first purpose of the present work was to determine the pathogenic nature of selected variants and their effect in the splicing process by minigene assays. The second aim was to analyze the USH1 transcripts, obtained from the nasal epithelium cells of our patients, in order to corroborate the observed effect of mutations by minigenes in patient’s tissues. The third goal of this study was to evaluate the nasal ciliary beat frequency in eight USH1 patients and compare it with thirty control subjects.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the ethic committees of the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria IIS-La Fe (Valencia, Spain) and the General and University Hospital (Valencia, Spain). Written consent was obtained from all subjects. Clinical investigation was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Selection of Variants

The first selection of sequence variations for functional studies was carried out on the following criteria: variants found in a homozygous state or in trans with a disease-causing mutation, cosegregation with the disease, not found in 200 control chromosomes or sequence variation located in exon or introns that may affect the mRNA processing. All changes have been characterized in our cohort of patients.

Computational Analysis of Splicing Variants

To analyze the effect of variants in the splice prediction and the recognition of donor and acceptor sites, in silico analyses were performed. Four programs were used: Neural Network SPLICE (NNSplice) 0.9 from the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (available at http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html), Human Splicing Finder (HSF)-Version 2.4 (available at http://www.umd.be/HSF/), NetGene2 (available at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/service/NetGene2/) and Spliceview (available at http://zeus2.itb.cnr.it/~webgene/wwwspliceview_ex.html).Score-values were calculated taking into account the bioinformatic predictions, from 1 to 4, depending on how many of the four programs have predicted changes on the splice sites.

Minigene Constructions and Expression

Minigene constructions based on the pSPL3 exon trapping vector (kindly provided by Dr. I Botillo and Dr. S. Tuffery-Giraud) were used to investigate the implication of selected variants on the mRNA processing. These variants were selected based on the bioinformatic predictions. For these putative splicing variants, the exon and intronic flanking sequences were amplified from the patient’s DNA, using the High Fidelity Phusion polymerase (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland) with primers detailed in Table 1. Amplicons were inserted between the XhoI/NheI restriction sites, using T4 DNA ligase (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA). We only could obtain the wild type (WT) insert for the variant c.3717+2dupTT (PCDH15) and the mutant insert for changes c.3652G>A and c.5581C>T (MYO7A), c.1086-12G>A (USH1C), c.8722+1delG (CDH23) and c.1304_1305insC, c.2868+5G>A and c.1737C>G (PCDH15). The corresponding WT or mutant insert was obtained by site-directed mutagenesis using primers detailed in Table 2. Minigene constructions were confirmed by direct sequencing in both directions with BigDye Terminator 3.1 cycle sequencing kit from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, USA). Sequence reactions were analyzed on a capillary ABI 3500xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Afterwards, minigenes were transfected into COS-7 cells as described before by Jaijo et al. [19]. RNA extraction and RT-PCR analysis was performed as previously described [20], [21]. All experiments were performed in duplicate.
Table 1

Primers used to amplify the specific insert.

Sequence variantPrimerSequence 5′->3′Size (bp)
c.6_9dup (p.L4DfsX39)MYO7A L4DfsX39_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG AGTGGCTGAGAGAAGAATTC 563
L4DfsX39_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC GGATCCAGAGATGTGTGTAA
c.470G>A (p.S157N) MYO7A S157N_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG AGACTCCACCTCCCTCTTCA 668
S157N_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC GCTAATGTGAGCTTTGGTAGC
c.640G>A (p.G214R) MYO7Ac.721C>G (p.R241G) MYO7A G214R & R241G_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG GAAGGTGAAGGAGAGTGCG 703
G214R & R241G_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC TTCATGGTGGGATTTCCAGC
c.1097T>C (p.L366P)MYO7A L366P_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG TGACATGCTGGAGGGAGTTA 608
L366P_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC CTGACCAAAGCAGGCCAAAA
c.1342_1343delAG (p.S448LfsX2) MYO7A S448LfsX2_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG TCTCCAGGCAGAGGGAACAG 524
S448LfsX2_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC AGCCAGGCTCAGCTGACCTT
c.3508G>A (p.E1170K) MYO7A E1170K_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG GAGGTGCTTTATGCCCGATG 545
E1170K_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC GAGTGTGGGGAAAAGAGGTG
c.3652G>A (p.G1218R) MYO7A G1218R_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG ATAGATGGTGGAGCTGAGAG 370
G1218R_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC GCACTGGACACACACACACA
c.5581C>T (p.R1861X) MYO7A R1861X_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG ACTAGTTGCATCTGGCTGTC 543
R1861X_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC ATCCTGAGCAGCTGCAGGAT
c.1086-12G>A USH1C USH1C_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG ACAAGCTCGGGGACTTTGCT 438
USH1C_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC ATGGTCTCTGACCCACAGCT
c.2289+1G>A CDH23 c.2289_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG CAAATATTTCCTCCTCATGG 636
c.2289_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC GCAGGAGAGAAAGTATTTCA
c.6049G>A (p.G2017S) CDH23 G2017_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG CTTGCTCACCACTCTCATGT 594
G2017_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC GTATCGTCTCCAAGCCTCTT
c.8722+1delG CDH23 c.8722_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG TTCTGGGCAACACTCCGTGA 1226
c.8722_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC GGATGGACGGATAACTAATGG
c.1304_1305insC PCDH15 c.1304_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG CAGAAGACTGAAGCAATTAAGCC 647
c.1304_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC ATATACTGAATATCTGCAAGCTG
c.2868+5G>A PCDH15 c.2868_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG ATTCCAGTGGAACGGCCTTC 533
c.2868_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC TATGCTCTGTACCTGTGGATG
c.3717+2dupTT PCDH15 c.3717_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG CAGAATTATACCTATGTCCC 635
c.3717_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC AGTGACTAACAATCTGAGTG
c.521A>G (p.N174S) PCDH15 N174S_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG TTCTTCGCCCATAGCAAGA 605
N174S_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC TGAGGCATATTATACCTATG
c.1737C>G (p.Y579X) PCDH15 Y579X_D_XhoI AAGAAT CTCGAG AGTATTGTAACAGGACACAG 596
Y579X_R_NheI AAGAAT GCTAGC CCTCTGATATTGTCCTCTTC

Tails added at the beginning of the primer are indicated in bold.

Enzyme restriction sites used in this study are indicated in italics.

Table 2

Primers used for the site-directed mutagenesis.

Sequence variantsPrimerSequence 5′->3′
c.3717+2dupTT PCDH15 WTc.3717-D-WTGCAAAGCCGATGTACTCGT-AAGTAGATAAAACTTCAGG
c.3717-R-WTCCTGAAGTTTTATCTACTT-ACGAGTACATCGGCTTTGC
c.5581C>T (p.R1861X) MYO7A MUTR1861X-D-MUT GCTTCCTGCAGTCCCGAAAGCACTGCCCA
R1861X-R-MUT TGGGCAGTGCTTTCGGGACTGCAGGAAGC
c.3652G>A (p.G1218R) MYO7A MUTG1218R-D-MUT AACTTCATCCACAGGGGCCCGCCCG
G1218R-R-MUT CGGGCGGGCCCCTGTGGATGAAGTT
c.1086-12G>A USH1C MUTc.1086-D-MUT CCAGTAACAGGCATGGGGATCTCATTTTAGGATTGTAG
c.1086-R-MUT CTACAATCCTAAAATGAGATCCCCATGCCTGTTACTGG
c.8722+1delG CDH23 MUTc.8722-D-MUTGGTCTTCACCATGG-TAGGGCCTGGCAGC
c.8722-R-MUTGCTGCCAGGCCCTA-CCATGGTGAAGACC
c.1304_1305insC PCDH15 MUTc.1304-D-MUT GTAGCTCTGGACAAGGACATAGAAGACTGTAAGTTAAATACATATTTTGC
c.1304-R-MUT GCAAAATATGTATTTAACTTACAGTCTTCTATGTCCTTGTCCAGAGCTAC
c.2868+5G>A PCDH15 MUTc.2868-D-MUT GAAGATGCAGACCCTCCTGTAAATAGAAGGCATTGATTAATATT
c.2868-R-MUT AATATTAATCAATGCCTTCTATTTACAGGAGGGTCTGCATCTTC
c.1737C>G (p.Y579X) PCDH15 MUTY579X-D-MUT TGATAGTCGGGCGGACTTAGGCACTCACGG
Y579X-R-MUT CCGTGAGTGCCTAAGTCCGCCCGACTATCA

The nucleotides that have been modified are indicated in bold.

The positions of deleted nucleotides are represented with (−).

Tails added at the beginning of the primer are indicated in bold. Enzyme restriction sites used in this study are indicated in italics. The nucleotides that have been modified are indicated in bold. The positions of deleted nucleotides are represented with (−).

Nasal Epithelial Cells Samples from Controls and Patients

A total of thirty-eight fresh nasal samples were obtained from eight USH1 patients, five patients with mutations in MYO7A gene and three patients with mutations in the CDH23 gene, and thirty control subjects. The nasal samples were obtained from the middle nasal concha using curettage without local anesthesia, in a period during which acute infection was absent [12], in the ENT service of the Hospital General de Valencia, Spain.

RNA and Sequence Analysis

RNA extraction from nasal epithelial cells and RT-PCR analysis was performed as previously described [11]. cDNA was used as template in nested PCR reactions with specific primers in order to amplify the regions containing the mutation (Table 3). PCR products were tested on 1.5% agarose gel and purified by ExoSAP. PCR products were sequenced and analyzed. All experiments were performed in duplicate.
Table 3

Primers used to amplify fragments of MYO7A and CDH23 cDNAs from nasal cells.

GeneExonsPrimersSequence 5′->3′Size(bp)
MYO7A 1–5MYO_EXP_1-5-EXT-D AGAGACAAGAGACACACACA 628
MYO_EXP_1-5-EXT-R CTTCTTGTTGGTATACTGGC
MYO_EXP_1-5-INT-D TAGAACGAGACTTGGAGCCA 490
MYO_EXP_1-5-INT-R TTCACAGCCACCAGGATGGA
3–9MYO_EXP_3-9-EXT-D ACCATGTGTGGATGGACCTG 937
MYO_EXP_3-9-EXT-R CTTCGAGATCTCCCAGTTCT
MYO_EXP_3-9-INT-D ACTCTGGGCAGGTCCAGGT 806
MYO_EXP_3-9-INT-R TGTTGGCGTACTCCTGGCT
8–14MYO_EXP_8-14-EXT-D TGTTCTACTGCATGCTGGAG 906
MYO_EXP_8-14-EXT-R CCTGCAAAATGGTTGATGCC
MYO_EXP_8-14-INT-D AAGAAGAAGCTGGGTTGGG 811
MYO_EXP_8-14-INT-R TTGGCGTTGAGCTTGTGCT
25–33MYO_EXP_25-33-EXT-D ATGAGACCCTGGGCAAGAAG 1136
*MYO_EXP_25-33-EXT-R CTTCTGGGCATCAGTTCTCC
MYO_EXP_25-33-INT-D AGGGCCAGAAGAAGAGCAGT 924
MYO_EXP_25-33-INT-R CGCTCCAGGATCATCTCAGA
38–45MYO_EXP_38-45-EXT-D TCCTATGACTACTTCAGGCC 1010
MYO_EXP_38-45-EXT-R GGGGAAGTAGGACTTGTCCT
MYO_EXP_38-45-INT-D TCAAGCAGGCGCTGCTCAAGA 835
MYO_EXP_38-45-INT-R CGTGCACTTGTGGTAGCCTC
CDH23 18–24CDH_EXP_18-24-EXT-D ATGAACAGATATCCAATGGGC 790
CDH_EXP_18-24-EXT-R GGTTCTGAAAGGTGGGGTCA
CDH_EXP_18-24-INT-D AATGACAACCCTCCCACCTT 627
CDH_EXP_18-24-INT-R CACTGCTGGTGGCTTTCAGA
43–49CDH_EXP_43-49-EXT-D CATCAACGACAACGACCCTGT 1084
CDH_EXP_43-49-EXT-R GGTTGAGGTCGTGGTCAATG
CDH_EXP_43-49-INT-D TCTGTGAAGGACAACCCGGA 708
CDH_EXP_43-49-INT-R GAATGGTGACAATGGCTGTG
57–63CDH_EXP_57-63-EXT-D CTCATCTTGGTGGCCAGCGAC 1015
CDH_EXP_57-63-EXT-R CCGGCAGCCGGACAGAGAT
CDH_EXP_57-63-INT-D TTCATCGTCAAGGCCTCCAG 713
CDH_EXP_57-63-INT-R TAGCTGCTCCTTGTTCTCA

The primer MYO_EXP_25-33-EXT-R was designed by Vaché et al. [11].

The primer MYO_EXP_25-33-EXT-R was designed by Vaché et al. [11].

Nomenclature of Variants

The sequences obtained were compared with the consensus sequence NM 000260.3 for MYO7A, NM 153676.2 for USH1C, NM 022124.3 for CDH23 and NM 033056.3 for PCDH15. For the protein nomenclature, we used the Mutalyzer 2.0 beta-21 program (available at https://mutalyzer.nl/).

Nasal Ciliary Beat Frequency

Ciliary beat frequency was measured as described by Armengot et al. [12] in eight USH1 patients and thirty healthy subjects. The beat pattern was observed using high-resolution digital high-speed video imaging. Values were expressed in Hertz (Hz) as the mean ± standard error of mean.

Statistical Analysis

Ciliary beat frequencies were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunns post-hoc test. When only two groups were compared, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Significance levels were set at p<0.05. Data were analyzed with statistical analysis software GraphPad Prism (Version 5.01, San Diego, USA).

Results

Computational Analysis

One hundred and eight variants identified in the USH1 genes were studied with bioinformatic tools (SpliceView, NNSplice, NetGene2 and HSF) in order to analyze the effect of these variants in the splice prediction and the recognition of donor and acceptor sites. Nine MYO7A, three CDH23, five PCDH15 and one USH1C variants were predicted to alter the splicing mechanism creating or eliminating donor/acceptor splice sites, see table 4. Considering the four programs (Splice View, NNSplice, NetGene2 and HSF) the score-values were calculated. Eight out of the eighteen variants showed the highest score (4), five of them showed a score of 3, two of the variants were observed to show a score of 2 and the three remaining changes showed a score of 1.
Table 4

Results from four different bioinformatic programs used to predict the effect on the splicing process.

Sequence variantsType ofsplicesite NetGene2 HSF NNSplice Splice View Score
c.6_9dup (p.L4DfsX39) MYO7A [14] AcceptorScore for acceptor siteincreases from 77 to 82The WT consensus sequenceis not recognizedOne donor site is not recognizedNew acceptor sites are created and other acceptor sites are not recognized3
c.470G>A (p.S157N) MYO7A [14] DonorScore for the main donorsite decreases from 93 to 60Score for donor site decreasesand a new acceptor site iscreatedThe main donor site isnot recognizedThe main donor site isnot recognized4
c.640G>A (p.G214R) MYO7A [22] AcceptorNeutralThe WT consensus sequenceis not recognizedA new acceptor site is createdNeutral1
c.721C>G (p.R241G) MYO7A [15] DonorThree new donor siteare createdA new acceptor siteis createdScore for the main acceptor site decreases from 81 to 59A new donor site is created4
c.1097T>C (p.L366P) MYO7A [15] AcceptorScore for the main acceptorsite decreases from 83 to 77Score for the acceptorsite decreasesA new acceptor site is createdNeutral3
c.1342_1343delAG (p.S448LfsX2) MYO7A [14] DonorThe main donor site is notrecognizedThe main donor site and theacceptor site arenot recognizedThe main donor site isnot recognizedThe main donor site isnot recognized4
c.3508G>A (p.E1170K) MYO7A [23] AcceptorScore for the main acceptorsite decreases from 85 to 77NeutralNeutralNeutral1
c.3652G>A (p.G1218R) MYO7A [15] AcceptorA new acceptor siteis createdA new acceptor siteis createdA new acceptor site is createdA new acceptor site is created4
c.5581C>T (p.R1861X) MYO7A [22] AcceptorScore for the main acceptorsite decreases from 77 to 72NeutralNeutralNeutral1
c.1086-12G>A USH1C [17] AcceptorA new acceptor siteis createdScore for acceptor sitedecreasesScore for the main acceptor site decreases from 48 to 45The main acceptor site isnot recognized4
c.2289+1G>A CDH23 [24] DonorThe main donor site isnot recognizedThe main donor site is notrecognizedThe main donor site isnot recognizedThe main donor site isnot recognized4
c.6049G>A (p.G2017S) CDH23 [25] DonorNeutralThe main donor site is notrecognizedThe main donor site isnot recognizedScore for the maindonor site decreasesfrom 89 to 843
c.8722+1delG CDH23 [16] DonorNeutralThe main donor site is notrecognizedThe main donor site isnot recognizedThe main donor site isnot recognized3
c.521A>G (p.N174S) PCDH15 [18] AcceptorScore for the main acceptorsite decreases from 92 to 87The main acceptor site isnot recognizedNeutralNeutral2
c.1304_1305insC (p.T436YfsX12) PCDH15 [18] DonorScore for the main donorsite decreases from 63 to 51The WT consensus sequenceis not recognizedScore for the maindonor site decreasesfrom 99 to 94Score for the main donor site decreases from 81 to 793
c.1737C>G (p.Y579X) PCDH15 [18] DonorScore for the main donorsite decreases from 52 to 37The main donor siteis not recognizedNeutralNeutral2
c.2868+5G>A PCDH15 [18] DonorThe main donor site is notrecognized and a newdonor site is createdThe main donor siteis not recognized.The main donor site isnot recognized.The main donor site isnot recognized.4
c.3717+2dupTT PCDH15 Present study DonorThe main donor site isnot recognizedThe main donor siteis not recognizedThe main donor site isnot recognizedThe main donor site isnot recognized4

Minigene Constructions

In order to confirm the bioinformatic predictions, minigenes were constructed and the different splicing products were analyzed. The minigene assays showed that only seven of them were affecting the mRNA processing: three MYO7A variants, c.470G>A, c.1342_1343delAG and c.3652G>A, three CDH23 changes, c.2289+1G>A, c.6049G>A and c.8722+1delG, and one PCDH15 variant, c.3717+2dupTT, see Table 5.
Table 5

Effects of USH1 variants on splicing.

Putative splicing variantsScoreaccording tobioinformatictoolsEffect on RNA level according to minigene resultsEffect on protein level according to minigene resultsEffect on RNA level according to nasal cells resultsEffect on protein level according to nasal cells results
c.6_9dup (p.L4DfsX39) MYO7A 3No effect on splicingp.L4DfsX39No effect on splicingp.L4DfsX39
c.470G>A (p.S157N) MYO7A 4Exon skippingp.T96WfsX29
c.640G>A (p.G214R) MYO7A 1No effect on splicingp.G214RNo effect on splicingp.G214R
c.721C>G (p.R241G) MYO7A 4No effect on splicingp.R241G
c.1097T>C (p.L366P) MYO7A 3No effect on splicingp.L366P
c.1342_1343delAG (p.S448LfsX2) MYO7A 4The mutation removes the main donorsite and creates a new donor splice-siteleading to a deletion of 24bpp.N443_E450del
c.3508G>A (p.E1170K) MYO7A 1No effect on splicingp.E1170KNo effect on splicingp.E1170K
c.3652G>A (p.G1218R) MYO7A 4The mutation does not recognize the acceptorsite and a new acceptor splice-site is createdleading to a deletion of 103-bp in the 5′end of exon 29p.Y1211AfsX18
c.5581C>T (p.R1861X) MYO7A 1No effect on splicingp.R1861XNo effect on splicingp.R1861X
* c.5856G>A (p.K1952K) MYO7A 4Exon skippingp.A1915_K1952delExon skippingp.A1915_K1952del
c.1086-12G>A USH1C 4No effect on splicingNeutral
c.2289+1G>A CDH23 4This variant does not recognize the main donorsite and a new donor splice-site is createdinserting the first 149 nucleotides of intron21+ Exon skippingp.N765SfsX35+ p.E727KfsX9Transcript with an insertionof the first 149 nucleotides of intron 21 plus the last 54 nucleotides of the same intronp.N765SfsX35
c.6049G>A (p.G2017S) CDH23 3Exon skippingp.T1976_G2017delProbable NMD-
c.8722+1delG CDH23 3Deletion of the last nucleotide of exon 60p.S2909AfsX43Deletion of the lastnucleotide of exon 60p.S2909AfsX43
c.521A>G (p.N174S) PCDH15 2No effect on splicingp.N174S
c.1304_1305insC (p.T436YfsX12) PCDH15 3No effect on splicingp.T436YfsX12
c.1737C>G (p.Y579X) PCDH15 2No effect on splicingp.Y579X
c.2868+5G>A PCDH15 4No effect on splicingNeutral
c.3717+2dupTT PCDH15 4c.3717+2dupTT does not recognize the maindonor site and creates a new donor splice-sitethat includes the first 52 nucleotides ofintron 27+ Exon skippingp.V1242RfsX2+ p.A1168_L1239del

Not performed in this study are indicated with (−).

NMD: Nonsense mediated decay.

c.5856G>A (p.K1952K, MYO7A) was previously analyzed by Jaijo et al. [26].

Not performed in this study are indicated with (−). NMD: Nonsense mediated decay. c.5856G>A (p.K1952K, MYO7A) was previously analyzed by Jaijo et al. [26].

c.470G>A (p.S157N, MYO7A)

The minigene assay showed that the processing of the WT minigene generated two main fragments: the correct processing (band A) and the exon skipping (band B). The mutant minigenes only showed one fragment corresponding to the skipping of exon 5 (band B) (Fig. 1A). If this mutant transcript was translated, it would produce a truncated protein of only 123 amino acids in length, p.T96WfsX29.
Figure 1

In vitro splicing assays for the seven splicing mutations identified in the USH1 genes.

Gel electrophoresis shows the different splicing processes for WT minigene and mutants constructions. COS-7 cell transfection experiments were performed in duplicate. A. c.470G>A (p.S157N, ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 5 (MYO7A). Band B is the skipping of involved exon. B. c.1342_1343delAG (p.S448LfsX2, ). Band A is the correct transcript corresponding to the exon 12 (MYO7A). Band B is the skipping of exon 12. C. c.3652G>A (p.G1218R ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 29 (MYO7A). The band B is the exon skipping. Band C is the heteroduplex formation from band A and band B. Band D is the aberrant splicing process that include the deletion of 103-bp of 5′end of exon 29. D. c.2289+1G>A ( ). Band A is the normal transcript of exon 21 (CDH23). Band B is the skipping of exon 21. Band C is the aberrant splicing process that includes the first 149 nucleotides of intron 21. E. c.6049G>A (p.G2017S, ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 46 (CDH23). Band B is the skipping of exon 46. Band C is the heteroduplex formation from the band A and B. F. c.8722+1delG ( ). Band A is the correct splicing process of exon 60 (CDH23). Band B is the abnormal splicing process of exon 60 that shows a deletion of the last nucleotide (G) of the involved exon. G. c.3717+2dupTT ( ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 27 (PCDH15). Band B is the skipping of the involved exon. Band C is the transcript corresponding to the new donor splice site from exon 27 plus the first 52 nucleotides of the intron 27. Band D is the heteroduplex formation from the band B and the band D.

In vitro splicing assays for the seven splicing mutations identified in the USH1 genes.

Gel electrophoresis shows the different splicing processes for WT minigene and mutants constructions. COS-7 cell transfection experiments were performed in duplicate. A. c.470G>A (p.S157N, ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 5 (MYO7A). Band B is the skipping of involved exon. B. c.1342_1343delAG (p.S448LfsX2, ). Band A is the correct transcript corresponding to the exon 12 (MYO7A). Band B is the skipping of exon 12. C. c.3652G>A (p.G1218R ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 29 (MYO7A). The band B is the exon skipping. Band C is the heteroduplex formation from band A and band B. Band D is the aberrant splicing process that include the deletion of 103-bp of 5′end of exon 29. D. c.2289+1G>A ( ). Band A is the normal transcript of exon 21 (CDH23). Band B is the skipping of exon 21. Band C is the aberrant splicing process that includes the first 149 nucleotides of intron 21. E. c.6049G>A (p.G2017S, ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 46 (CDH23). Band B is the skipping of exon 46. Band C is the heteroduplex formation from the band A and B. F. c.8722+1delG ( ). Band A is the correct splicing process of exon 60 (CDH23). Band B is the abnormal splicing process of exon 60 that shows a deletion of the last nucleotide (G) of the involved exon. G. c.3717+2dupTT ( ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 27 (PCDH15). Band B is the skipping of the involved exon. Band C is the transcript corresponding to the new donor splice site from exon 27 plus the first 52 nucleotides of the intron 27. Band D is the heteroduplex formation from the band B and the band D.

c.1342_1343delAG (p.S448LfsX2, MYO7A)

In vitro analyses confirmed that the WT transcript contained the correct exon (band A) but the c.1342_1343delAG construction generated several bands. We were only able to sequence band B that corresponded to the exon 12 with a partial deletion. The mutation removed the main donor site and created a new donor splice-site leading to a deletion of 24-bp (Fig. 1B). Thus, the new myosin VIIA protein generated, if this aberrant transcript was translated, it would be of 2207 amino acids in length, p.N443_E450del.

c.3652G>A (p.G1218R, MYO7A)

In vitro experiments showed that WT minigene generated two different transcripts: one of them corresponded to the correct transcript (band A) and the smallest and strongest transcript was the skipping of exon 29 (band B). A third band (band C) was also observed corresponding to the heteroduplex formation from the two obtained transcripts. Mutant minigene only showed one transcript corresponding to the aberrant splicing process (band D). This mutation avoided the recognition of the main acceptor site and created a new acceptor splice-site leading to a deletion of 103-bp in the 5′ end of exon 29 (Fig. 1C). If the c.3652G>A transcript was translated, it would generate a new truncated protein of 1227 amino acids in length, p.Y1211AfsX18.

c.2289+1G>A (CDH23)

The WT minigene generated a strong band corresponding to the correct transcript (band A) and a thin band corresponding to the exon skipping (band B). The mutant minigene showed two strong bands; one of them was the transcript with the exon 21 plus part of the intron 21 (band C) and the other band was the exon skipping (band B). This variant generated two different transcripts: one of them did not recognize the main donor site and created a new donor site including the first 149 nucleotides of intron 21 and the other transcript produced the skipping of exon 21. Thus, c.2289+1G>A would create two different proteins; p.N765SfsX35, of 798 amino acids in length, would correspond to the exon 21 plus 149 nucleotides of intron 21, and the other new truncated protein would be p.E727KfsX9, of 734 amino acids in length (Fig. 1D).

c.6049G>A (p.G2017S, CDH23)

Minigene assays revealed that the WT construction created two different transcripts: one of them corresponded to the correct transcript (band A) and the smallest transcript was the skipping of exon 46 (band B). A third band was also observed corresponding to the heteroduplex formation from the two smaller transcripts (band C). However, the c.6049G>A construction only showed one band corresponding to the skipping of exon 46 (band B) (Fig. 1E). If the transcript containing the c.6049G>A variant was translated, it would generate a protein of 3312 amino acids in length, p.T1976_G2017del.

c.8722+1delG (CDH23)

In vitro experiments showed that the WT construction generated one band (band A) corresponding to the correct transcript and the mutant construction showed a band with apparently the same size of the correct transcript (band B). However, when these fragments were sequenced, we could observe that the two fragments were different. The mutation produced the displacement of the donor splice site one nucleotide upstream, being the last nucleotide of the exon 60 processed as intron (Fig. 1F). If this mutant transcript was translated, it would be generating a new truncated protein of 2950 amino acids in length, p.S2909AfsX43.

c.3717+2dupTT (PCDH15)

In our series of patients, we identified a novel variant in intron 27 of the PCDH15 gene in one Spanish USH1 family in homozygous state. We confirmed by minigene assays that the WT construction generated one correct fragment (band A). However, the c.3717+2dupTT minigene showed two different transcripts: the smallest and strongest transcript corresponded to the skipping of exon 27 (band B) and transcript containing exon 27 plus part of intron 27 (band C). A bigger band was observed corresponding to the heteroduplex from the two transcripts (band D). This novel mutation generated two different transcripts: the smallest and strongest transcript that corresponded to the skipping of involved exon 27 and a second transcript corresponding to the no recognition of the main donor splice site and the creation of a new donor site that includes the first 52 nucleotides of intron 27 (Fig. 1G). Therefore, the mutation would be creating two different proteins; one of them, corresponding to the skipping of exon 27, would create an in-frame deletion of 72 amino acids in length, p.A1168_L1239del, and a new truncated protein, corresponding to the exon 27 plus the first 52 nucleotides of intron 27, of 1241 amino acids in length, p.V1242RfsX2.

Nasal Epithelial Cells

To carry out the second goal of the present study, we designed different primers to amplify particular fragments of the MYO7A and CDH23 cDNAs from the nasal epithelium cells of patients and controls, in order to corroborate the observed effect of mutations by minigenes in the patient’s tissues. We only could obtain samples from subjects carriers of eight of the nineteen variants analyzed in vitro by minigenes. These samples were obtained from five USH1 patients and two family healthy carriers of the mutations c.6_9dup (RP-1481) and c.640G>A (RP-1546) in the MYO7A gene (Table 6).
Table 6

Genotypes of the five USH1 patients and the two family healthy carriers of USH1 mutations presented in this study.

PatientGeneAllele 1/Allele 2
RP-1481* MYO7A c.6_9dup (p.L4DfsX39) (exon2)/+
RP-1546* MYO7A c.640G>A (p.G214R) (exon7)/+
RP-115 MYO7A c.3508G>A (p.E1170K) (exon 28)/c.3238A>T (p.K1080X) (exon 25)
RP-1479 MYO7A c.5581C>T (p.R1861X) (exon 40)/c.5581C>T (p.R1861X) (exon 40)
RP-280 MYO7A c.5856G>A (p.K1952K) (exon 42)/c.1190C>A (p.A397D) (exon 11)
RP-1534 CDH23 c.2289+1G>A (intron 21)/c.6049G>A (p.G2017S) (exon46)
RP-928 CDH23 c.8722+1delG (intron 60)/c.6511delC (exon48)

Family healthy carriers are indicated with an asterisk (*).

Family healthy carriers are indicated with an asterisk (*). Only in four of the eight studied variants (c.5856G>A in the MYO7A gene, c.2289+1G>A, c.6049G>A and c.8722+1delG in the CDH23 gene), we could observe an abnormal splicing process ex vivo (Table 5). In the remaining four samples both WT and mutant alleles were amplified showing that the presence of the mutations did not affect the splicing process.

c.5856G>A (p.K1952K, MYO7A)

Jaijo et al. [26] analyzed the c.5856G>A variant by minigene constructions. It showed the skipping of exon 42. The analysis of this change in the patient RP-280 replicate 1 revealed the presence of two transcripts: a fragment corresponding to the expected size, 835-bp also in the control sample (band A), and a fragment of 721-bp (band B). However, in the patient’s replicate 2, we only could amplify the smallest fragment. Sequencing of the products showed that the fragment of 835-bp corresponded to the normal allele. However, the product of 721-bp was the transcript without exon 42; if the transcript containing the p.K1952K variant was translated, it would create a new protein of 2177 amino acids in length, p.A1915_K1952del (Fig. 2A).
Figure 2

Transcript analysis of USH1 variants in nasal epithelial cells.

Gel electrophoresis shows the RT-PCR products obtained for USH1 patients and control samples. Electropherograms of the transcripts obtained show the molecular characterization of the effect of the studied variants. All experiments were performed in duplicate. A. c.5856G>A (p.K1952K, ). Band A is the correct splicing process of the exons 38–45 of the MYO7A gene. Band B is the skipping of exon 42. RP-280 replicate 1 shows two transcripts corresponding to the WT allele (band A) and mutant allele (band B). RP-280 replicate 2 shows only the band B corresponding to the aberrant transcript. B. c.2289+1G>A ( ). Band A is the transcript corresponding to the normal RNA processing of the exons 18–24 of the CDH23 gene. Band B is the aberrant transcript that includes the first 149 nucleotides and the last 54 nucleotides of intron 21. C. c.6049G>A (p.G2017S, ). RP-1534 shows only the WT allele. D. c.8722+1delG ( ). RP-928 shows the heterozygous transcript from WT allele and the mutant allele. It presents a deletion of the last nucleotide (G) of exon 60 of CDH23 gene.

Transcript analysis of USH1 variants in nasal epithelial cells.

Gel electrophoresis shows the RT-PCR products obtained for USH1 patients and control samples. Electropherograms of the transcripts obtained show the molecular characterization of the effect of the studied variants. All experiments were performed in duplicate. A. c.5856G>A (p.K1952K, ). Band A is the correct splicing process of the exons 38–45 of the MYO7A gene. Band B is the skipping of exon 42. RP-280 replicate 1 shows two transcripts corresponding to the WT allele (band A) and mutant allele (band B). RP-280 replicate 2 shows only the band B corresponding to the aberrant transcript. B. c.2289+1G>A ( ). Band A is the transcript corresponding to the normal RNA processing of the exons 18–24 of the CDH23 gene. Band B is the aberrant transcript that includes the first 149 nucleotides and the last 54 nucleotides of intron 21. C. c.6049G>A (p.G2017S, ). RP-1534 shows only the WT allele. D. c.8722+1delG ( ). RP-928 shows the heterozygous transcript from WT allele and the mutant allele. It presents a deletion of the last nucleotide (G) of exon 60 of CDH23 gene.

c.2289+1G>A CDH23

xamination of the RT-PCR product of the patient RP-1534 showed the presence of two transcripts, band A (observed in the replicate 2) and band B (observed in the replicate 1). However, in the control sample only one transcript was observed (band A). Sequencing of the band A showed the correct transcript of 627-bp. The patient’s replicate 1 amplified an abnormal transcript that included the first 149 nucleotides of intron 21 and the last 54 nucleotides of the same intron (band B) (Fig. 2B). Therefore, the mutation would be creating a new truncated protein of 798 amino acids in length, p.N765SfsX35. The patient RP-1534 also carried the p.G2017S. In this case, we only could amplify and sequence the normal allele (Fig. 2C). Analysis of the RT-PCR product of patient RP-928 showed only one band. However, sequencing clearly revealed the presence of two distinct transcripts: a normal spliced transcript and an abnormal transcript in which the splice site is modified causing the removal of one nucleotide (G) in the exons 60 and 61 boundary (Fig. 2D). Thus, if this mutant transcript was translated, the new protein would be of 2950 amino acids in length, p.S2909AfsX43.

Ciliary Beat Frequency

The ciliary beat frequencies obtained from each patient and control were summarized in Table 7. Ciliary beat pattern was normal in all the patients. We analyzed whether USH1 patients showed differences in ciliary beat frequency compared to controls. As shown in Fig. 3A, the ciliary beat frequency was significantly reduced in these patients (9.68±0.49 Hz, Mann Whitney U test, p  = 0.031) compared to controls (10.88±0.25 Hz).
Table 7

Nasal ciliary beat frequency of USH1 patients and controls.

MYO7A patientsNasal Ciliary Beat Frequency (Hz)
18.5
212
311.5
49.5
59.5
CDH23 patientsNasal Ciliary Beat Frequency (Hz)
18
29
39.5
Control subjectsNasal Ciliary Beat Frequency (Hz)
111.58
210
310
412
511.35
610.2
713
89
910.6
1012.3
1111
1212
1312.5
1410.8
159.1
1614
1710.7
189.5
199.5
2011.8
2111
229.5
239
2410.8
2514
269.75
279.75
2811.75
2910.5
3010.5
Disease GroupNasal ciliary beat frequency (Hz), mean ± SD
MYO7A (n = 5)10.20±1.44
CDH23 (n = 3)8.33±0.76
USH1 (n = 8)9.68±1.38
Control (n = 30)10.88±1.36
Figure 3

Nasal ciliary beat frequency in five MYO7A and three CDH23 patients, and thirty controls.

A. Comparison between USH1 group and Control group. The nasal ciliary beat frequency was significantly different between these groups (Mann Whitney Test, p  = 0.031). B. Comparison between the MYO7A group and CDH23 group, MYO7A and Control group and CDH23 group and Control group. The nasal ciliary beat frequency was significantly different between CDH23 group and Control group (P<0.05).

Nasal ciliary beat frequency in five MYO7A and three CDH23 patients, and thirty controls.

A. Comparison between USH1 group and Control group. The nasal ciliary beat frequency was significantly different between these groups (Mann Whitney Test, p  = 0.031). B. Comparison between the MYO7A group and CDH23 group, MYO7A and Control group and CDH23 group and Control group. The nasal ciliary beat frequency was significantly different between CDH23 group and Control group (P<0.05). We also evaluated whether ciliary beat frequency were different between MYO7A and CDH23 patients. No statistical differences were found between MYO7A patients (10.20±0.66 Hz) and CDH23 patients (8.83±0.44 Hz, Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunńs test). However, nasal ciliary beat frequency was significantly lower in CDH23 patients than in controls (p<0.05, Kruskal-Wallis Test followed by Dunńs test) (Fig. 3B).

Discussion

A high number of mutations responsible for USH have been identified by screenings performed in USH patients. The effect of variants that lead to premature stop codons is not questioned; however, it is complicated to predict the consequences of missense, silent and intronic changes, in order to discriminate neutral variants from those with pathogenic effect. Variants putative to affect the splicing process are usually considered pathogenic on the basis of their conservation in the canonical splice site, their absence in control samples, cosegregation with the disease in families and results from bioinformatic predictions [26]. Four bioinformatic programs (NNSplice, SpliceView, HSF and NetGene2) were used to predict the damaging effect of the variants identified in the USH1 genes of our cohort and eighteen changes were selected as putative to affect the splicing process (Table 4). These results are only computational predictions so, additional studies are necessary to confirm the effect on the mRNA processing. Minigenes and RNA assays were performed to achieve this goal. Minigene assays revealed that only seven of the eighteen studied variants were affecting the splicing process (Table 5). The bioinformatic analysis of these seven variants had shown high scores. A maximum score of 4, for five of them: c.470G>A, c.1342_1343delAG and c.3652G>A in the MYO7A gene, c.2289+1G>A in CDH23 gene and c.3717+2dupTT in PCDH15 gene. The other two variants (c.6049G>A and c.8722+1delG in the CDH23 gene) showed a score of 3. However, other studied variants that also reached a high score (≥3) did not show any effect in the splicing process when they were analyzed by minigenes. According to these results, all types of putative pathogenic variants should be analyzed by bioinformatic tools, and, when high scores are observed, minigene analysis should be performed to avoid false positive. See Table 5. However, the splicing processes observed by minigenes would not necessarily reflect the real processing in affected tissues. In our study, we could analyze RNA from nasal epithelial cells from patients or carriers of eight variants previously analyzed by minigene constructions, to determine their effect on splicing process in patient’s tissues. Analysis of the RT-PCR amplification of nasal cells allowed us to confirm that four of the eight studied variants, one MYO7A (c.5856G>A) and three CDH23 (c.2289+1G>A, c.6049G>A and c.8722+1delG), were affecting the splicing process. The same results were obtained by minigene constructions for the eight studied variants, except for two CDH23 changes, c.2289+1G>A and c.6049G>A. For the c.2289+1G>A variant the different results obtained by both methods are due to the minigene construction did not contain the entire intron 21 of the CDH23 gene. In the study of the c.6049G>A variant by analysis of RT-PCR amplification from nasal cells we were not able to amplify the mutant transcript. This fragment could be degraded by nonsense mediated decay mechanism (NMD), decreasing the mRNAs levels and therefore, the protein levels. However, by minigene construction we had observed in this case the skipping of exon 46. In three cases (c.5856G>A (MYO7A), c.2289+1G>A (CDH23) and c.6049G>A (CDH23)), we could only amplify one of the two alleles due to the low USH1 genes expression level in this tissue. In fact, these USH transcripts are only detectable by nested PCR. Accordingly, it is advisable to detect the presence of heterozygous changes by sequencing, the studied mutation or other SNPs, to confirm the amplification of the two alleles and avoid incorrect conclusions when apparently only one fragment is obtained after PCR. Therefore, minigenes are a good approach to ascertain the pathogenic nature of splice variants when is difficult to obtain RNA from patients’ tissues, as in the case of USH genes, that present a restricted expression profile associated with photoreceptors and inner hair cells. These constructions are expressed in living cells where the splicing machinery remains intact. In addition, we can confirm that the analysis of nasal epithelial cells is an alternative method to discriminate neutral Usher variants from those with a pathogenic effect on the splicing process. Finally, we have also demonstrated that the nasal ciliated epithelium of USH1 patients has a lower ciliary beat frequency than control subjects. Armengot et al. [12] suggested that mutations in the USH1 and USH2 genes could be responsible for the lower ciliary beat frequency. They observed a low beat frequency in USH2 patients. However, the ciliary activity was sufficient to operate normally and no clinical consequences were observed in these patients.
  24 in total

1.  Nasal epithelial cells are a reliable source to study splicing variants in Usher syndrome.

Authors:  Christel Vaché; Thomas Besnard; Catherine Blanchet; David Baux; Lise Larrieu; Valérie Faugère; Michel Mondain; Christian Hamel; Sue Malcolm; Mireille Claustres; Anne-Françoise Roux
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 2.  Protein networks and complexes in photoreceptor cilia.

Authors:  Ronald Roepman; Uwe Wolfrum
Journal:  Subcell Biochem       Date:  2007

3.  Nasal ciliary beat frequency and beat pattern in retinal ciliopathies.

Authors:  Miguel Armengot; David Salom; Manuel Diaz-Llopis; Jose M Millan; Javier Milara; Manuel Mata; Julio Cortijo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Identification of three novel mutations in the MYO7A gene

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Mutation profile of all 49 exons of the human myosin VIIA gene, and haplotype analysis, in Usher 1B families from diverse origins.

Authors:  A Adato; D Weil; H Kalinski; Y Pel-Or; H Ayadi; C Petit; M Korostishevsky; B Bonne-Tamir
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Survey of the frequency of USH1 gene mutations in a cohort of Usher patients shows the importance of cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 genes and establishes a detection rate of above 90%.

Authors:  A-F Roux; V Faugère; S Le Guédard; N Pallares-Ruiz; A Vielle; S Chambert; S Marlin; C Hamel; B Gilbert; S Malcolm; M Claustres
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Functional analysis of splicing mutations in exon 7 of NF1 gene.

Authors:  Irene Bottillo; Alessandro De Luca; Annalisa Schirinzi; Valentina Guida; Isabella Torrente; Stefano Calvieri; Cristina Gervasini; Lidia Larizza; Antonio Pizzuti; Bruno Dallapiccola
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 2.103

8.  CDH23 mutation and phenotype heterogeneity: a profile of 107 diverse families with Usher syndrome and nonsyndromic deafness.

Authors:  L M Astuto; J M Bork; M D Weston; J W Askew; R R Fields; D J Orten; S J Ohliger; S Riazuddin; R J Morell; S Khan; S Riazuddin; H Kremer; P van Hauwe; C G Moller; C W R J Cremers; C Ayuso; J R Heckenlively; K Rohrschneider; U Spandau; J Greenberg; R Ramesar; W Reardon; P Bitoun; J Millan; R Legge; T B Friedman; W J Kimberling
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Microarray-based mutation analysis of 183 Spanish families with Usher syndrome.

Authors:  Teresa Jaijo; Elena Aller; Gema García-García; María J Aparisi; Sara Bernal; Almudena Avila-Fernández; Isabel Barragán; Montserrat Baiget; Carmen Ayuso; Guillermo Antiñolo; Manuel Díaz-Llopis; Maigi Külm; Magdalena Beneyto; Carmen Nájera; Jose M Millán
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Novel mutations in the USH1C gene in Usher syndrome patients.

Authors:  María José Aparisi; Gema García-García; Teresa Jaijo; Regina Rodrigo; Claudio Graziano; Marco Seri; Tulay Simsek; Enver Simsek; Sara Bernal; Montserrat Baiget; Herminio Pérez-Garrigues; Elena Aller; José María Millán
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.367

View more
  14 in total

1.  Noncanonical Splice Site and Deep Intronic FRMD7 Variants Activate Cryptic Exons in X-linked Infantile Nystagmus.

Authors:  Junwon Lee; Han Jeong; Dongju Won; Saeam Shin; Seung-Tae Lee; Jong Rak Choi; Suk Ho Byeon; Helen J Kuht; Mervyn G Thomas; Jinu Han
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.048

2.  Accelerated age-related olfactory decline among type 1 Usher patients.

Authors:  João Carlos Ribeiro; Bárbara Oliveiros; Paulo Pereira; Natália António; Thomas Hummel; António Paiva; Eduardo D Silva
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Functional analysis by minigene assay of putative splicing variants found in Bardet-Biedl syndrome patients.

Authors:  María Álvarez-Satta; Sheila Castro-Sánchez; Guillermo Pousada; Diana Valverde
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 5.310

4.  Molecular and functional characterization of the BMPR2 gene in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Guillermo Pousada; Vincenzo Lupo; Sheila Cástro-Sánchez; María Álvarez-Satta; Ana Sánchez-Monteagudo; Adolfo Baloira; Carmen Espinós; Diana Valverde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Next-generation sequencing reveals the mutational landscape of clinically diagnosed Usher syndrome: copy number variations, phenocopies, a predominant target for translational read-through, and PEX26 mutated in Heimler syndrome.

Authors:  Christine Neuhaus; Tobias Eisenberger; Christian Decker; Sandra Nagl; Cornelia Blank; Markus Pfister; Ingo Kennerknecht; Cornelie Müller-Hofstede; Peter Charbel Issa; Raoul Heller; Bodo Beck; Klaus Rüther; Diana Mitter; Klaus Rohrschneider; Ute Steinhauer; Heike M Korbmacher; Dagmar Huhle; Solaf M Elsayed; Hesham M Taha; Shahid M Baig; Heidi Stöhr; Markus Preising; Susanne Markus; Fabian Moeller; Birgit Lorenz; Kerstin Nagel-Wolfrum; Arif O Khan; Hanno J Bolz
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.183

6.  New mutations found by Next-Generation Sequencing screening of Spanish patients with Nemaline Myopathy.

Authors:  Sarah Moreau-Le Lan; Elena Aller; Ines Calabria; Lola Gonzalez-Tarancon; Cristina Cardona-Gay; Marina Martinez-Matilla; Maria J Aparisi; Jorge Selles; Lydia Sagath; Inmaculada Pitarch; Nuria Muelas; Jose V Cervera; Jose M Millan; Laia Pedrola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Usher Syndrome: Genetics of a Human Ciliopathy.

Authors:  Carla Fuster-García; Belén García-Bohórquez; Ana Rodríguez-Muñoz; Elena Aller; Teresa Jaijo; José M Millán; Gema García-García
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Mutational and clinical analysis of the ENG gene in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Guillermo Pousada; Adolfo Baloira; Diego Fontán; Marta Núñez; Diana Valverde
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  High-throughput sequencing for the molecular diagnosis of Usher syndrome reveals 42 novel mutations and consolidates CEP250 as Usher-like disease causative.

Authors:  Carla Fuster-García; Gema García-García; Teresa Jaijo; Neus Fornés; Carmen Ayuso; Miguel Fernández-Burriel; Ana Sánchez-De la Morena; Elena Aller; José M Millán
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Aberrant Splicing Events Associated to CDH23 Noncanonical Splice Site Mutations in a Proband with Atypical Usher Syndrome 1.

Authors:  Rebeca Valero; Marta de Castro-Miró; Sofía Jiménez-Ochoa; Juan José Rodríguez-Ezcurra; Gemma Marfany; Roser Gonzàlez-Duarte
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.