| Literature DB >> 23451239 |
María José Aparisi1, Gema García-García, Elena Aller, María Dolores Sequedo, Cristina Martínez-Fernández de la Cámara, Regina Rodrigo, Miguel Armengot, Julio Cortijo, Javier Milara, Manuel Díaz-LLopis, Teresa Jaijo, José María Millán.
Abstract
Usher syndrome type I (USH1) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by congenital profound deafness, vestibular areflexia and prepubertal retinitis pigmentosa. The first purpose of this study was to determine the pathologic nature of eighteen USH1 putative splicing variants found in our series and their effect in the splicing process by minigene assays. These variants were selected according to bioinformatic analysis. The second aim was to analyze the USH1 transcripts, obtained from nasal epithelial cells samples of our patients, in order to corroborate the observed effect of mutations by minigenes in patient's tissues. The last objective was to evaluate the nasal ciliary beat frequency in patients with USH1 and compare it with control subjects. In silico analysis were performed using four bioinformatic programs: NNSplice, Human Splicing Finder, NetGene2 and Spliceview. Afterward, minigenes based on the pSPL3 vector were used to investigate the implication of selected changes in the mRNA processing. To observe the effect of mutations in the patient's tissues, RNA was extracted from nasal epithelial cells and RT-PCR analyses were performed. Four MYO7A (c.470G>A, c.1342_1343delAG, c.5856G>A and c.3652G>A), three CDH23 (c.2289+1G>A, c.6049G>A and c.8722+1delG) and one PCDH15 (c.3717+2dupTT) variants were observed to affect the splicing process by minigene assays and/or transcripts analysis obtained from nasal cells. Based on our results, minigenes are a good approach to determine the implication of identified variants in the mRNA processing, and the analysis of RNA obtained from nasal epithelial cells is an alternative method to discriminate neutral Usher variants from those with a pathogenic effect on the splicing process. In addition, we could observe that the nasal ciliated epithelium of USH1 patients shows a lower ciliary beat frequency than control subjects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23451239 PMCID: PMC3581446 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Primers used to amplify the specific insert.
| Sequence variant | Primer | Sequence 5′->3′ | Size (bp) |
| c.6_9dup (p.L4DfsX39) | L4DfsX39_D_XhoI |
| 563 |
| L4DfsX39_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.470G>A (p.S157N) | S157N_D_XhoI |
| 668 |
| S157N_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.640G>A (p.G214R) | G214R & R241G_D_XhoI |
| 703 |
| G214R & R241G_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.1097T>C (p.L366P) | L366P_D_XhoI |
| 608 |
| L366P_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.1342_1343delAG (p.S448LfsX2) | S448LfsX2_D_XhoI |
| 524 |
| S448LfsX2_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.3508G>A (p.E1170K) | E1170K_D_XhoI |
| 545 |
| E1170K_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.3652G>A (p.G1218R) | G1218R_D_XhoI |
| 370 |
| G1218R_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.5581C>T (p.R1861X) | R1861X_D_XhoI |
| 543 |
| R1861X_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.1086-12G>A | USH1C_D_XhoI |
| 438 |
| USH1C_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.2289+1G>A | c.2289_D_XhoI |
| 636 |
| c.2289_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.6049G>A (p.G2017S) | G2017_D_XhoI |
| 594 |
| G2017_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.8722+1delG | c.8722_D_XhoI |
| 1226 |
| c.8722_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.1304_1305insC | c.1304_D_XhoI |
| 647 |
| c.1304_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.2868+5G>A | c.2868_D_XhoI |
| 533 |
| c.2868_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.3717+2dupTT | c.3717_D_XhoI |
| 635 |
| c.3717_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.521A>G (p.N174S) | N174S_D_XhoI |
| 605 |
| N174S_R_NheI |
| ||
| c.1737C>G (p.Y579X) | Y579X_D_XhoI |
| 596 |
| Y579X_R_NheI |
|
Tails added at the beginning of the primer are indicated in bold.
Enzyme restriction sites used in this study are indicated in italics.
Primers used for the site-directed mutagenesis.
| Sequence variants | Primer | Sequence 5′->3′ |
| c.3717+2dupTT | c.3717-D-WT | GCAAAGCCGATGTACTCGT-AAGTAGATAAAACTTCAGG |
| c.3717-R-WT | CCTGAAGTTTTATCTACTT-ACGAGTACATCGGCTTTGC | |
| c.5581C>T (p.R1861X) | R1861X-D-MUT |
|
| R1861X-R-MUT |
| |
| c.3652G>A (p.G1218R) | G1218R-D-MUT |
|
| G1218R-R-MUT |
| |
| c.1086-12G>A | c.1086-D-MUT |
|
| c.1086-R-MUT |
| |
| c.8722+1delG | c.8722-D-MUT | GGTCTTCACCATGG-TAGGGCCTGGCAGC |
| c.8722-R-MUT | GCTGCCAGGCCCTA-CCATGGTGAAGACC | |
| c.1304_1305insC | c.1304-D-MUT |
|
| c.1304-R-MUT |
| |
| c.2868+5G>A | c.2868-D-MUT |
|
| c.2868-R-MUT |
| |
| c.1737C>G (p.Y579X) | Y579X-D-MUT |
|
| Y579X-R-MUT |
|
The nucleotides that have been modified are indicated in bold.
The positions of deleted nucleotides are represented with (−).
Primers used to amplify fragments of MYO7A and CDH23 cDNAs from nasal cells.
| Gene | Exons | Primers | Sequence 5′->3′ | Size(bp) |
|
| 1–5 | MYO_EXP_1-5-EXT-D |
| 628 |
| MYO_EXP_1-5-EXT-R |
| |||
| MYO_EXP_1-5-INT-D |
| 490 | ||
| MYO_EXP_1-5-INT-R |
| |||
| 3–9 | MYO_EXP_3-9-EXT-D |
| 937 | |
| MYO_EXP_3-9-EXT-R |
| |||
| MYO_EXP_3-9-INT-D |
| 806 | ||
| MYO_EXP_3-9-INT-R |
| |||
| 8–14 | MYO_EXP_8-14-EXT-D |
| 906 | |
| MYO_EXP_8-14-EXT-R |
| |||
| MYO_EXP_8-14-INT-D |
| 811 | ||
| MYO_EXP_8-14-INT-R |
| |||
| 25–33 | MYO_EXP_25-33-EXT-D |
| 1136 | |
|
|
| |||
| MYO_EXP_25-33-INT-D |
| 924 | ||
| MYO_EXP_25-33-INT-R |
| |||
| 38–45 | MYO_EXP_38-45-EXT-D |
| 1010 | |
| MYO_EXP_38-45-EXT-R |
| |||
| MYO_EXP_38-45-INT-D |
| 835 | ||
| MYO_EXP_38-45-INT-R |
| |||
|
| 18–24 | CDH_EXP_18-24-EXT-D |
| 790 |
| CDH_EXP_18-24-EXT-R |
| |||
| CDH_EXP_18-24-INT-D |
| 627 | ||
| CDH_EXP_18-24-INT-R |
| |||
| 43–49 | CDH_EXP_43-49-EXT-D |
| 1084 | |
| CDH_EXP_43-49-EXT-R |
| |||
| CDH_EXP_43-49-INT-D |
| 708 | ||
| CDH_EXP_43-49-INT-R |
| |||
| 57–63 | CDH_EXP_57-63-EXT-D |
| 1015 | |
| CDH_EXP_57-63-EXT-R |
| |||
| CDH_EXP_57-63-INT-D |
| 713 | ||
| CDH_EXP_57-63-INT-R |
|
The primer MYO_EXP_25-33-EXT-R was designed by Vaché et al. [11].
Results from four different bioinformatic programs used to predict the effect on the splicing process.
| Sequence variants | Type ofsplicesite |
|
|
|
| Score |
|
| Acceptor | Score for acceptor siteincreases from 77 to 82 | The WT consensus sequenceis not recognized | One donor site is not recognized | New acceptor sites are created and other acceptor sites are not recognized | 3 |
|
| Donor | Score for the main donorsite decreases from 93 to 60 | Score for donor site decreasesand a new acceptor site iscreated | The main donor site isnot recognized | The main donor site isnot recognized | 4 |
|
| Acceptor | Neutral | The WT consensus sequenceis not recognized | A new acceptor site is created | Neutral | 1 |
|
| Donor | Three new donor siteare created | A new acceptor siteis created | Score for the main acceptor site decreases from 81 to 59 | A new donor site is created | 4 |
|
| Acceptor | Score for the main acceptorsite decreases from 83 to 77 | Score for the acceptorsite decreases | A new acceptor site is created | Neutral | 3 |
|
| Donor | The main donor site is notrecognized | The main donor site and theacceptor site arenot recognized | The main donor site isnot recognized | The main donor site isnot recognized | 4 |
|
| Acceptor | Score for the main acceptorsite decreases from 85 to 77 | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | 1 |
|
| Acceptor | A new acceptor siteis created | A new acceptor siteis created | A new acceptor site is created | A new acceptor site is created | 4 |
|
| Acceptor | Score for the main acceptorsite decreases from 77 to 72 | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | 1 |
|
| Acceptor | A new acceptor siteis created | Score for acceptor sitedecreases | Score for the main acceptor site decreases from 48 to 45 | The main acceptor site isnot recognized | 4 |
|
| Donor | The main donor site isnot recognized | The main donor site is notrecognized | The main donor site isnot recognized | The main donor site isnot recognized | 4 |
|
| Donor | Neutral | The main donor site is notrecognized | The main donor site isnot recognized | Score for the maindonor site decreasesfrom 89 to 84 | 3 |
|
| Donor | Neutral | The main donor site is notrecognized | The main donor site isnot recognized | The main donor site isnot recognized | 3 |
|
| Acceptor | Score for the main acceptorsite decreases from 92 to 87 | The main acceptor site isnot recognized | Neutral | Neutral | 2 |
|
| Donor | Score for the main donorsite decreases from 63 to 51 | The WT consensus sequenceis not recognized | Score for the maindonor site decreasesfrom 99 to 94 | Score for the main donor site decreases from 81 to 79 | 3 |
|
| Donor | Score for the main donorsite decreases from 52 to 37 | The main donor siteis not recognized | Neutral | Neutral | 2 |
|
| Donor | The main donor site is notrecognized and a newdonor site is created | The main donor siteis not recognized. | The main donor site isnot recognized. | The main donor site isnot recognized. | 4 |
|
| Donor | The main donor site isnot recognized | The main donor siteis not recognized | The main donor site isnot recognized | The main donor site isnot recognized | 4 |
Effects of USH1 variants on splicing.
| Putative splicing variants | Scoreaccording tobioinformatictools | Effect on RNA level according to minigene results | Effect on protein level according to minigene results | Effect on RNA level according to nasal cells results | Effect on protein level according to nasal cells results |
|
| 3 | No effect on splicing | p.L4DfsX39 | No effect on splicing | p.L4DfsX39 |
|
| 4 | Exon skipping | p.T96WfsX29 | – | – |
|
| 1 | No effect on splicing | p.G214R | No effect on splicing | p.G214R |
|
| 4 | No effect on splicing | p.R241G | – | – |
|
| 3 | No effect on splicing | p.L366P | – | – |
|
| 4 | The mutation removes the main donorsite and creates a new donor splice-siteleading to a deletion of 24bp | p.N443_E450del | – | – |
|
| 1 | No effect on splicing | p.E1170K | No effect on splicing | p.E1170K |
|
| 4 | The mutation does not recognize the acceptorsite and a new acceptor splice-site is createdleading to a deletion of 103-bp in the 5′end of exon 29 | p.Y1211AfsX18 | – | – |
|
| 1 | No effect on splicing | p.R1861X | No effect on splicing | p.R1861X |
|
| 4 | Exon skipping | p.A1915_K1952del | Exon skipping | p.A1915_K1952del |
|
| 4 | No effect on splicing | Neutral | – | – |
|
| 4 | This variant does not recognize the main donorsite and a new donor splice-site is createdinserting the first 149 nucleotides of intron21+ Exon skipping | p.N765SfsX35+ p.E727KfsX9 | Transcript with an insertionof the first 149 nucleotides of intron 21 plus the last 54 nucleotides of the same intron | p.N765SfsX35 |
|
| 3 | Exon skipping | p.T1976_G2017del | Probable NMD | - |
|
| 3 | Deletion of the last nucleotide of exon 60 | p.S2909AfsX43 | Deletion of the lastnucleotide of exon 60 | p.S2909AfsX43 |
|
| 2 | No effect on splicing | p.N174S | – | – |
|
| 3 | No effect on splicing | p.T436YfsX12 | – | – |
|
| 2 | No effect on splicing | p.Y579X | – | – |
|
| 4 | No effect on splicing | Neutral | – | – |
|
| 4 | c.3717+2dupTT does not recognize the maindonor site and creates a new donor splice-sitethat includes the first 52 nucleotides ofintron 27+ Exon skipping | p.V1242RfsX2+ p.A1168_L1239del | – | – |
Not performed in this study are indicated with (−).
NMD: Nonsense mediated decay.
c.5856G>A (p.K1952K, MYO7A) was previously analyzed by Jaijo et al. [26].
Figure 1In vitro splicing assays for the seven splicing mutations identified in the USH1 genes.
Gel electrophoresis shows the different splicing processes for WT minigene and mutants constructions. COS-7 cell transfection experiments were performed in duplicate. A. c.470G>A (p.S157N, ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 5 (MYO7A). Band B is the skipping of involved exon. B. c.1342_1343delAG (p.S448LfsX2, ). Band A is the correct transcript corresponding to the exon 12 (MYO7A). Band B is the skipping of exon 12. C. c.3652G>A (p.G1218R ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 29 (MYO7A). The band B is the exon skipping. Band C is the heteroduplex formation from band A and band B. Band D is the aberrant splicing process that include the deletion of 103-bp of 5′end of exon 29. D. c.2289+1G>A ( ). Band A is the normal transcript of exon 21 (CDH23). Band B is the skipping of exon 21. Band C is the aberrant splicing process that includes the first 149 nucleotides of intron 21. E. c.6049G>A (p.G2017S, ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 46 (CDH23). Band B is the skipping of exon 46. Band C is the heteroduplex formation from the band A and B. F. c.8722+1delG ( ). Band A is the correct splicing process of exon 60 (CDH23). Band B is the abnormal splicing process of exon 60 that shows a deletion of the last nucleotide (G) of the involved exon. G. c.3717+2dupTT ( ). Band A is the correct transcript of exon 27 (PCDH15). Band B is the skipping of the involved exon. Band C is the transcript corresponding to the new donor splice site from exon 27 plus the first 52 nucleotides of the intron 27. Band D is the heteroduplex formation from the band B and the band D.
Genotypes of the five USH1 patients and the two family healthy carriers of USH1 mutations presented in this study.
| Patient | Gene | Allele 1/Allele 2 |
| RP-1481* |
|
|
| RP-1546* |
|
|
| RP-115 |
|
|
| RP-1479 |
|
|
| RP-280 |
|
|
| RP-1534 |
|
|
| RP-928 |
|
|
Family healthy carriers are indicated with an asterisk (*).
Figure 2Transcript analysis of USH1 variants in nasal epithelial cells.
Gel electrophoresis shows the RT-PCR products obtained for USH1 patients and control samples. Electropherograms of the transcripts obtained show the molecular characterization of the effect of the studied variants. All experiments were performed in duplicate. A. c.5856G>A (p.K1952K, ). Band A is the correct splicing process of the exons 38–45 of the MYO7A gene. Band B is the skipping of exon 42. RP-280 replicate 1 shows two transcripts corresponding to the WT allele (band A) and mutant allele (band B). RP-280 replicate 2 shows only the band B corresponding to the aberrant transcript. B. c.2289+1G>A ( ). Band A is the transcript corresponding to the normal RNA processing of the exons 18–24 of the CDH23 gene. Band B is the aberrant transcript that includes the first 149 nucleotides and the last 54 nucleotides of intron 21. C. c.6049G>A (p.G2017S, ). RP-1534 shows only the WT allele. D. c.8722+1delG ( ). RP-928 shows the heterozygous transcript from WT allele and the mutant allele. It presents a deletion of the last nucleotide (G) of exon 60 of CDH23 gene.
Nasal ciliary beat frequency of USH1 patients and controls.
|
| Nasal Ciliary Beat Frequency (Hz) |
| 1 | 8.5 |
| 2 | 12 |
| 3 | 11.5 |
| 4 | 9.5 |
| 5 | 9.5 |
|
| Nasal Ciliary Beat Frequency (Hz) |
| 1 | 8 |
| 2 | 9 |
| 3 | 9.5 |
| Control subjects | Nasal Ciliary Beat Frequency (Hz) |
| 1 | 11.58 |
| 2 | 10 |
| 3 | 10 |
| 4 | 12 |
| 5 | 11.35 |
| 6 | 10.2 |
| 7 | 13 |
| 8 | 9 |
| 9 | 10.6 |
| 10 | 12.3 |
| 11 | 11 |
| 12 | 12 |
| 13 | 12.5 |
| 14 | 10.8 |
| 15 | 9.1 |
| 16 | 14 |
| 17 | 10.7 |
| 18 | 9.5 |
| 19 | 9.5 |
| 20 | 11.8 |
| 21 | 11 |
| 22 | 9.5 |
| 23 | 9 |
| 24 | 10.8 |
| 25 | 14 |
| 26 | 9.75 |
| 27 | 9.75 |
| 28 | 11.75 |
| 29 | 10.5 |
| 30 | 10.5 |
| Disease Group | Nasal ciliary beat frequency (Hz), mean ± SD |
|
| 10.20±1.44 |
|
| 8.33±0.76 |
| USH1 (n = 8) | 9.68±1.38 |
| Control (n = 30) | 10.88±1.36 |
Figure 3Nasal ciliary beat frequency in five MYO7A and three CDH23 patients, and thirty controls.
A. Comparison between USH1 group and Control group. The nasal ciliary beat frequency was significantly different between these groups (Mann Whitney Test, p = 0.031). B. Comparison between the MYO7A group and CDH23 group, MYO7A and Control group and CDH23 group and Control group. The nasal ciliary beat frequency was significantly different between CDH23 group and Control group (P<0.05).