Literature DB >> 19681962

Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.

Timo Dreiseidler1, Jörg Neugebauer, Lutz Ritter, Thea Lingohr, Daniel Rothamel, Robert A Mischkowski, Joachim E Zöller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of the first integrated system for cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging, dental implant planning and surgical template-aided implant placement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of CBCT scans, a total of 54 implant positions were planned for 10 partially edentulous anatomical patient-equivalent models. Surgical guides were ordered from the manufacturer (SICAT). Two different types of guidance were assessed: for assessment of the SICAT system inherent accuracy vendor's titanium sleeves of 2 mm internal diameter and 5 mm length were utilized for pilot drills. The guide sleeves of the NobelGuide system were implemented for fully guided surgery and implant insertion. Deviations perpendicular to the implant axes at the crestal and apical end, as well as the angle deviations between the virtual planning data and the surgical results, were measured utilizing a follow-up CBCT investigation and referential marker-based registration.
RESULTS: The SICAT system inherent mean deviation rates for the drilled pilot osteotomies were determined to be smaller than 500 mum even at the apical end. Mean angle deviations of 1.18 degrees were determined. Utilizing the NobelGuide sleeve-in-sleeve system for fully guided implant insertion in combination with the investigated template technology enabled to insert dental implants with the same accuracy. Crestal deviations, in general, were significantly lower than the apical deviations.
CONCLUSION: Although hardly comparable due to different study designs and measurement strategies, the investigated SICAT system's inherent accuracy corresponds to the most favourable results for computer-aided surgery systems published so far. In combination with the NobelGuide surgical set for fully guided insertion, the same accuracy level could be maintained for implant positioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19681962     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01764.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  10 in total

1.  Accuracy of templates for navigated implantation made by rapid prototyping with DICOM datasets of cone beam computer tomography (CBCT).

Authors:  Jochen Weitz; Herbert Deppe; Sebastian Stopp; Tim Lueth; Steffen Mueller; Bettina Hohlweg-Majert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of mesiodistal space measurements of single-implant sites on panoramic and oblique images generated by cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Mustafa Alkhader; Malik Hudieb
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  The effect of scan parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructural measurements of the human mandible.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; I H A Aartman; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adrià Jorba-García; Albert González-Barnadas; Octavi Camps-Font; Rui Figueiredo; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Evaluation of different registration methods and dental restorations on the registration duration and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral scans: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Xing-Yu Piao; Ji-Man Park; Hannah Kim; Youngjun Kim; June-Sung Shim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Accuracy of computer-assisted implant placement with insertion templates.

Authors:  Eleni Naziri; Alexander Schramm; Frank Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2016-05-13

7.  Accuracy Evaluation of a Stereolithographic Surgical Template for Dental Implant Insertion Using 3D Superimposition Protocol.

Authors:  Corina Marilena Cristache; Silviu Gurbanescu
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-05-07

8.  Alveolar ridge preservation and primary stability as influencing factors on the transfer accuracy of static guided implant placement: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Liesa Brunken; Cornelia Edelmann; Jens Dreyhaupt; Heike Rudolph; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles-An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students.

Authors:  Matthias C Schulz; Lena Rittmann; Ursula Range; Günter Lauer; Dominik Haim
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-01

10.  Accuracy of computer-guided implantation in the placement of one-piece ceramic dental implants in the anterior region: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Nopparat Suksod; Chatchai Kunavisarut; Jira Kitisubkanchana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.