Literature DB >> 19681685

Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of deep brain stimulator systems: a serial imaging and clinical retrospective study.

Vaninder Chhabra1, Edward Sung, Klaus Mewes, Roy A E Bakay, Aviva Abosch, Robert E Gross.   

Abstract

OBJECT: With the expanding indications and increasing number of patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS), postoperative MR imaging is becoming even more important in guiding clinical care and practice-based learning; important safety concerns have recently emerged, however. Although phantom model studies have driven conservative recommendations regarding imaging parameters, highlighted by 2 recent reports describing adverse neurological events associated with MR imaging in patients with implanted DBS systems, the risks of MR imaging in such patients in clinical practice has not been well addressed. In this study, the authors capitalized on their large experience with serial MR imaging (3 times per patient) to use MR imaging itself and clinical outcomes to examine the safety of MR imaging in patients who underwent staged implantation of DBS electrodes for Parkinson disease, tremor, and dystonia.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients underwent staged bilateral lead implantations between 1997 and 2006, and each patient underwent 3 separate MR imaging sessions subsequent to DBS placement. The first of these was performed after the first DBS placement, the second occurred prior to the second DBS placement, and third was after the second DBS placement. Follow-up was conducted to examine adverse events related either to MR imaging or to DBS-induced injury.
RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two MR images were obtained, and the mean follow-up time was 3.67 years. The average time between the first and second, and second and third MR imaging sessions was 19.4 months and 14.7 hours, respectively. Twenty-two MR imaging-detected new findings of hemorrhage were documented. However, all new findings were related to acute DBS insertion, whereas there were no new findings after imaging of the chronically implanted electrode.
CONCLUSIONS: Although potential risks of MR imaging in patients undergoing DBS may be linked to excessive heating, induced electrical currents, disruption of the normal operation of the device, and/or magnetic field interactions, MR imaging can be performed safely in these patients and provides useful information on DBS lead location to inform patient-specific programming and practice-based learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19681685     DOI: 10.3171/2009.7.JNS09572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  16 in total

Review 1.  Neural circuit modulation during deep brain stimulation at the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease: what have we learned from neuroimaging studies?

Authors:  Daniel L Albaugh; Yen-Yu Ian Shih
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 2.  MRI-related heating near deep brain stimulation electrodes: more data are needed.

Authors:  Akshay A Gupte; Devashish Shrivastava; Maggie A Spaniol; Aviva Abosch
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 3.  Role of radiology in central nervous system stimulation.

Authors:  D P Minks; E A C Pereira; V E L Young; K M Hogarth; G Quaghebeur
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Optimized, Minimal Specific Absorption Rate MRI for High-Resolution Imaging in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes.

Authors:  A M Franceschi; G C Wiggins; A Y Mogilner; T Shepherd; S Chung; Y W Lui
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Post-operative imaging in deep brain stimulation: A controversial issue.

Authors:  Christian Saleh; Georges Dooms; Christophe Berthold; Frank Hertel
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 6.  Role of functional imaging in the development and refinement of invasive neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Nolan R Williams; Joseph J Taylor; Kayla Lamb; Colleen A Hanlon; E Baron Short; Mark S George
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28

7.  Bilateral Cortical Encephalomalacia in a Patient Implanted With Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation for Alzheimer's Disease: A Case Report.

Authors:  David P McMullen; Paul Rosenberg; Jennifer Cheng; Gwenn S Smith; Constantine Lyketsos; William S Anderson
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

8.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transplantation of Neural Stem Cells into the Porcine Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Jason J Lamanna; Lindsey N Urquia; Carl V Hurtig; Juanmarco Gutierrez; Cody Anderson; Pete Piferi; Thais Federici; John N Oshinski; Nicholas M Boulis
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 9.  Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Measurements of RF heating during 3.0-T MRI of a pig implanted with deep brain stimulator.

Authors:  Krzysztof R Gorny; Michael F Presti; Stephan J Goerss; Sun C Hwang; Dong-Pyo Jang; Inyong Kim; Hoon-Ki Min; Yunhong Shu; Christopher P Favazza; Kendall H Lee; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.