Literature DB >> 19679090

Protein-peptide interactions adopt the same structural motifs as monomeric protein folds.

Peter Vanhee1, Francois Stricher, Lies Baeten, Erik Verschueren, Tom Lenaerts, Luis Serrano, Frederic Rousseau, Joost Schymkowitz.   

Abstract

We compared the modes of interaction between protein-peptide interfaces and those observed within monomeric proteins and found surprisingly few differences. Over 65% of 731 protein-peptide interfaces could be reconstructed within 1 A RMSD using solely fragment interactions occurring in monomeric proteins. Interestingly, more than 80% of interacting fragments used in reconstructing a protein-peptide binding site were obtained from monomeric proteins of an entirely different structural classification, with an average sequence identity below 15%. Nevertheless, geometric properties perfectly match the interaction patterns observed within monomeric proteins. We show the usefulness of our approach by redesigning the interaction scaffold of nine protein-peptide complexes, for which five of the peptides can be modeled within 1 A RMSD of the original peptide position. These data suggest that the wealth of structural data on monomeric proteins could be harvested to model protein-peptide interactions and, more importantly, that sequence homology is no prerequisite.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19679090     DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  32 in total

1.  Structure-based characterization of the binding of peptide to the human endophilin-1 Src homology 3 domain using position-dependent noncovalent potential analysis.

Authors:  Chunjiang Fu; Gang Wu; Fenglin Lv; Feifei Tian
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Characterization of PDZ domain-peptide interactions using an integrated protocol of QM/MM, PB/SA, and CFEA analyses.

Authors:  Feifei Tian; Yonggang Lv; Peng Zhou; Li Yang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Modeling protein-peptide recognition based on classical quantitative structure-affinity relationship approach: implication for proteome-wide inference of peptide-mediated interactions.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Zhong Ni; Keping Chen; Haijun Liu; Liang Chen; Chaoqun Lian; Lirong Yan
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Tertiary alphabet for the observable protein structural universe.

Authors:  Craig O Mackenzie; Jianfu Zhou; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  MDockPeP: An ab-initio protein-peptide docking server.

Authors:  Xianjin Xu; Chengfei Yan; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  In silico and in vitro elucidation of BH3 binding specificity toward Bcl-2.

Authors:  Nir London; Stefano Gullá; Amy E Keating; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Mining tertiary structural motifs for assessment of designability.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  VitAL: Viterbi algorithm for de novo peptide design.

Authors:  E Besray Unal; Attila Gursoy; Burak Erman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The culprit behind amyloid beta peptide related neurotoxicity in Alzheimer's disease: oligomer size or conformation?

Authors:  Kerensa Broersen; Frederic Rousseau; Joost Schymkowitz
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 6.982

10.  PepX: a structural database of non-redundant protein-peptide complexes.

Authors:  Peter Vanhee; Joke Reumers; Francois Stricher; Lies Baeten; Luis Serrano; Joost Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.