Literature DB >> 8098251

Developments in the ureteroscopes, techniques and accessories associated with laser lithotripsy.

G M Watson1, B Landers, R Nauth-Misir, J E Wickham.   

Abstract

Two stages in the development of the technique of laser lithotripsy are described. In the first series, spanning 1985-1988, three consecutive groups of patients are compared. In the first 100 patients, 11.5-F ureteroscopes were used. Access on first retrograde attempt was successful in 73%; 3% developed strictures; the ureteric perforation rate was 7%; and 12% required nephrostomy drainage. These results contrast with those of the third group in this series, consisting of 200 patients using a miniaturised ureteroscope. Access on the first retrograde attempt was successful in 99%. There were no strictures, no perforations and no requirements for nephrostomy drainage. (The second group of 100 patients using a range of rigid ureteroscopes was intermediate in its complication rate: 2% developed strictures, the ureteric perforation rate was 3%, and 6% required nephrostomy drainage). In the second series, spanning 1989-1990, the procedures were performed by all grades of urologists using miniaturised endoscopes. An in-depth audit was performed and each patient was followed until completely clear of fragments. The stones were successfully accessed on the first attempt in 213 cases (89%). In group A (139 patients, no basket used) 32 renal units (23%) were cleared of stone fragments immediately following the procedure, rising to 78 units (56%) by 3 months and 99 units (71%) beyond 3 months follow-up. Some fragments remained in 40 renal units and were cleared by further ureteroscopy, ESWL or PCNL, with the exception of 1 patient who had small residual fragments despite ESWL for fragments flushed to the kidney.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8098251     DOI: 10.1007/bf00182166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

1.  Ureteral stone manipulation before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  R J Evans; D D Wingfield; B A Morollo; A D Jenkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Safety and efficacy of electrohydraulic lithotripsy by ureteroscopy.

Authors:  M K Willscher; J F Conway; R K Babayan; P Morrisseau; G R Sant; A Bertagnoll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Complications following ureteroscopy.

Authors:  R Biester; J Y Gillenwater
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Late sequelae of the management of ureteral calculi with the ureterorenoscope.

Authors:  W Stackl; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Endourological treatment of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  R I Kahn
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Early experience with direct vision electrohydraulic lithotripsy of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  D F Green; B Lytton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  An assessment of the pulsed dye laser for fragmenting calculi in the pig ureter.

Authors:  G Watson; S Murray; S P Dretler; J A Parrish
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Ureteral and renal endoscopy. A new-approach.

Authors:  E Pérez-Castro Ellendt; J A Martínez-Piñeiro
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of the ureteral calculus--clinical results with local shockwave lithotripsy].

Authors:  D M Wilbert; G E Voges; S C Müller; P Alken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  An evaluation of ureteral laser lithotripsy: 225 consecutive patients.

Authors:  S P Dretler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.