Literature DB >> 19669673

A prospective study of variability in mammographic density during the menstrual cycle.

Monica Morrow1, Robert T Chatterton, Alfred W Rademaker, Nanjiang Hou, V Craig Jordan, R Edward Hendrick, Seema A Khan.   

Abstract

Mammographic breast density has been proposed as a surrogate endpoint in breast cancer prevention studies, but little is known about its variability over time, particularly in relation to menstrual cycle phase. The purpose of this study was to assess variation in breast density on digital mammograms using quantitative and qualitative density measures. Menstrual cycle phase was determined by salivary estradiol and progesterone assays. 73 healthy subjects with regular menses had 1-3 mammograms with paired saliva collection during a 12-month period. The mean difference in density as a percentage of the mean density was calculated for follicular-luteal (n = 50), luteal-luteal (n = 26) and follicular-follicular (n = 23) pairs in the same woman using the same breast. Two density measures (measurement of dense area and BIRADS) were used. The mean luteal density exceeded the mean follicular density by 7.1-9.2%, but density differences between luteal pairs and follicular pairs did not exceed 5%. The intraclass correlation for measurement of dense area was greater than 85% in all phases of the menstrual cycle, but was below 50% for BIRADS for luteal-follicular and follicular-follicular pairs. Our study provides estimates of the amount of variation in mammographic density during the menstrual cycle, and that inherent in repeated density measurement in premenopausal women, and suggests that menstrual phase of mammographic evaluation should be controlled for in intervention studies where density is being used as a surrogate measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19669673     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0496-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  15 in total

1.  Double-Blind Randomized 12-Month Soy Intervention Had No Effects on Breast MRI Fibroglandular Tissue Density or Mammographic Density.

Authors:  Anna H Wu; Darcy Spicer; Agustin Garcia; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Linda Hovanessian-Larsen; Pulin Sheth; Sue Ellen Martin; Debra Hawes; Christy Russell; Heather MacDonald; Debu Tripathy; Min-Ying Su; Giske Ursin; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-08-14

2.  Menstrual cycle-related fluctuations in breast density measured by using three-dimensional MR imaging.

Authors:  Siwa Chan; Min-Ying L Su; Fu-Ju Lei; Jia-Pei Wu; Muqing Lin; Orhan Nalcioglu; Stephen A Feig; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Accuracy of screening mammography varies by week of menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Rod Walker; Donald L Weaver; Diana S M Buist; Stephen H Taplin; Patricia A Carney; Robert D Rosenberg; Mark B Dignan; Zhuo Tracy Zhang; Emily White
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Endogenous sex hormones and breast density in young women.

Authors:  Seungyoun Jung; Frank Z Stanczyk; Brian L Egleston; Linda G Snetselaar; Victor J Stevens; John A Shepherd; Linda Van Horn; Erin S LeBlanc; Kenneth Paris; Catherine Klifa; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Effect of menstrual cycle phase on background parenchymal uptake at molecular breast imaging.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Amy Lynn Conners; Celine M Vachon; Michael K O'Connor; Lynne T Shuster; Adam C Bartley; Deborah J Rhodes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Association Between Lifestyle Changes, Mammographic Breast Density, and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sara P Lester; Aparna S Kaur; Suneela Vegunta
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.837

7.  Correlation of endogenous hormonal levels, fibroglandular tissue volume and percent density measured using 3D MRI during one menstrual cycle.

Authors:  J H Chen; W P Chen; S Chan; D C Yeh; M Y Su; C E McLaren
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Diet across the Lifespan and the Association with Breast Density in Adulthood.

Authors:  Jessica Lindgren; Joanne Dorgan; Jennifer Savage-Williams; Donna Coffman; Terryl Hartman
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-02-02

9.  Alcohol consumption, endogenous estrogen and mammographic density among premenopausal women.

Authors:  Hanne Frydenberg; Vidar G Flote; Ine M Larsson; Emily S Barrett; Anne-Sofie Furberg; Giske Ursin; Tom Wilsgaard; Peter T Ellison; Anne McTiernan; Anette Hjartåker; Grazyna Jasienska; Inger Thune
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Assessing Detection, Discrimination, and Risk of Breast Cancer According to Anisotropy Parameters of Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  Ruisheng Jiang; Xiangmin Zeng; Shihang Sun; Zhijun Ma; Ximing Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.