| Literature DB >> 19668338 |
Beatriz Guzmán1, María Dolores Lledó, Pablo Vargas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adaptive radiation in Mediterranean plants is poorly understood. The white-flowered Cistus lineage consists of 12 species primarily distributed in Mediterranean habitats and is herein subject to analysis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19668338 PMCID: PMC2719431 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of species used in the phylogenetic analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| Albania, Greece | Cultivated | R. G. Page 8cBGA04 (MA) |
|
| Iberia, S France, N Italy, N Africa, Corsica, Sardigna | Spain, Madrid, Aldea del Fresno | P. Vargas 25PV03 (MA) |
|
| La Gomera, Tenerife (Canary Islands) | Canary Islands, La Gomera | Á. Fernández & J. Leralta 44BGA04 (MA) |
| R. G. Page 8bBGA04 (MA) | |||
|
| Spain, Italia, N Africa, Sicily | Spain, Málaga, Mijas | C. Navarro |
|
| Balear Islands, SE Iberia Peninsula | Spain, Balear Islands, Mallorca, Sa Rápita | P. Vargas 209PV04 (MA) |
|
| Mediterranean Basin | Greece, Olympus | B. Guzmán 58BGA04 (MA) |
|
| Iberia, S France, N Italy, N Africa, Corsica, Sicily | Spain, Córdoba, Posadas | B. Guzmán 99BGA04 (MA) |
|
| SE Spain, N Africa | Morocco, Beni-Hadifa | B.Guzmán 2BGA05 (MA) |
|
| Gran Canaria (Canary Islands) | Canary Islands, Gran Canaria, Ayacata | B. Guzmán 109BGA04 (MA) |
|
| S Spain, N Africa | Morocco, Targuist | B. Guzmán 7BGA03 (MA) |
|
| S France, Iberia, N Africa, Cyprus | Spain, Madrid, Boadilla del Monte | B. Guzmán 29BGA04 (MA) |
|
| S Portugal | Portugal, Sagres | B. Guzmán 13BGA03 (MA) |
|
| N Africa, Iberia, France, Italy, Corsica, Turkey | Spain, Jaén, Sierra de Segura | R. G. Page 149BGA04 (MA) |
|
| Portugal, S Spain, Argelia | Spain, Córdoba | B. Guzmán 35BGA04 (MA) |
|
| Mediterranean Basin, Canary Islands | Portugal, Sagres | O. Filippi 4BGA04 (MA) |
|
| Algeria, Morocco | Morocco | R. G. Page 8BGA04 (MA) |
|
| Gran Canaria (Canary Islands) | Canary Islands, Gran Canaria | P. Escobar 48/05 (MA) |
|
| Tenerife (Canary Islands) | Canary Islands, Tenerife | O. Filippi 6BGA04 (MA) |
|
| Greece, Turkey, Italy, Cyprus, N Libia, Lampedusa | Greece, Crete | B. Guzmán 20BGA04 (MA) |
|
| Iberia, N Morocco | Portugal, Ourique | P. Vargas 5PV03 (MA) |
|
| Iberia, S France | Spain, Ávila, Arenas de San Pedro | R. G. Page 8tBGA04 (MA) |
|
| Algeria, N Morocco, France | France | P. Vargas 7PV03 (MA) |
|
| Iberia, France | Spain, Ávila, Arenas de San Pedro | P. Vargas 6PV03 (MA) |
|
| Mediterranean Basin | Spain, Ávila, Arenas de San Pedro | B. Guzmán 143BGA04 (MA) |
|
| El Hierro,La Palma,La Gomera,Tenerife,Gran Canaria | Canary Islands, La Palma, La Cumbrecita | |
|
| |||
|
| Mediterranean Basin | Portugal, Ferrerías | B. Guzmán 53BGA04 (MA) |
| Halimium (Dunal) Spach | |||
|
| N Africa | Morocco, Tazzeka | RDG14/2006/5 |
|
| Spain, N Morocco | Spain, Granada, Sierra Nevada | P. Vargas 120PV04 (MA) |
|
| Iberia, NW Morocco | Portugal, Cabo Sardao | B. Guzmán 49BGA04 (MA) |
|
| Iberia, Morocco | Spain, Málaga, Marbella | A. Segura (MA580185) |
|
| SW Iberia, N Morocco | Spain, Málaga | P. Vargas 3PV06 |
|
| N Africa | Morocco, Bab-Berred | P. Escobar 665/04 (MA) |
|
| Iberia Peninsula, N Morocco | Portugal, Coimbra | R. G. Page 158BGA04 (MA) |
|
| Mediterranean Basin | Spain, Madrid, Tres Cantos | P. Vargas 71BGA04 (MA) |
|
| |||
|
| Iberia, N Africa | Cultivated | B. Guzmán 70BGA04 (MA) |
|
| |||
|
| W Europe, Mediterranean Basin, Canary Islands | Portugal, Vila do Vispo | B. Guzmán 44BGA04 (MA) |
Figure 1Phylogenetic hypothesis based on plastid (trnL-F, trnK-matK, trnS-trnG, rbcL) and nuclear (ITS, ncpGS) sequences.
(A) Strict consensus of 104 equally parsimonious trees of 1317 steps (CI = 0.82, RI = 0.80), showing bootstrap support for clades above branches; (B) Bayesian inference tree (50% majority rule consensus tree) showing posterior probabilities above branches.
Characteristics of each of the DNA sequence regions used in the phylogenetic analysis of Cistaceae and the white-flowered Cistus.
|
|
|
|
| ITS | ncp | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|
| 1084 | 516 | 1403 | 1404 | 697 | 402 |
|
| 617–824 | 399–461 | 1302–1357 | 1403–1404 | 644–650 | 340–452 |
|
| 158–684 | 377–422 | 1301–1316 | 1404 | 585–654 | 318 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 713 | 516 | 1403 | 1379 | 697 | 402 |
|
| 148/54 | 128/52 | 280/108 | 103/44 | 203–69 | 86/17 |
|
| 21% | 33% | 33% | 43% | 65% | 40% |
|
| 17.92% | 14.1% | 14.08% | 4.11% | 20.37% | 35.4% |
|
| GTR+G | GTR+G | GTR+G | GTR+I | GTR+I+G | HKY+G |
|
| ||||||
|
| 45/25 | 28/11 | 33/12 | 20/10 | 75/33 | 25/8 |
|
| 1.90% | 3.15% | 0.85% | 0.74% | 4.21% | 3.11% |
|
| GTR+I | F81+I | GTR | HKY | HKY+I+G | HKY+G |
Morphological and environmental characteristics of the white-flowered Cistus lineage. Data were taken from Grosser [75], Martín & Guinea [76], Dansereau [77] *, Warburg [78], Demoly and Montserrat [79], Greuter [80], Gülz et al. [49] ** and own observations.
| Soil | Climate conditions | Altitude (m) | Insolation conditions*, environment | Leaf shape (length×width in mm) | |
|
| serpentines | mesic, Mediterranean mountain | 1000–1500 | submesophyllous, | elliptic (3–5×0.8–1.5)1 |
|
| calcicolous | dry to semi-arid, Mediterranean coast | 0–1500 | helioxerophyllous, bushy vegetation | linear (10–26×1–2) |
|
| silicolous | dry, Mediterranean | (0) 300–1000 (1500) | subheliophyllous, degradated
| linear-lanceolate (40–80×6–21) |
|
| silicolous | mesic, Mediterranean mountain | 1900 (400–2800) | submesophyllous, degradated
| ovate-lanceolate (40–90×17–30) |
|
| silicolous, sandy | dry, Mediterranean coast | 0–500 (1200) | subsciophyllous, degradated
| linear (22–40×2–5) |
|
| silicolous | dry, Mediterranean | 0–800 (1200) | subheliophyllous, degradated
| linear-lanceolate (15–45×2–7) |
|
| calcicolous | Mediterranean coast | 0–100 | helioxerophyllous, bushy vegetation | linear (6–30×1–4) |
|
| calcicolous | dry, Mediterranean coast | 0–600 | helioxerophyllous, scrub vegetation | ovate (15–30×7–27) |
|
| silicolous | dry, Mediterranean | 200–1500 | submesophyllous, degradated
| ovate-lanceolate (50–95×25–55) |
|
| silicolous | dry, mountain Mediterranean | 800–1800 | subheliophyllous, degradated
| lanceolate-elliptic (20–31×4–11) |
|
| silicolous | humid, woodlands of Atlantic influence | 0–800 (1100) | submesophyllous, scrub vegetation | lanceolate-elliptic (30–65×10–23) |
|
| silicolous/calcicolous | humid to dry, Mediterranean and Eurosiberian regions | 0–1800 | subheliophyllous/submesophyllous, degradated woodlands of many types | ovate (8–18×7–12) |
Note: 1 values from 16 leaves.
% per unit leaf dry weight.
Figure 2Historical patterns of leaf characters and ecological attributes.
Key characteristics are mapped onto the MacClade optimization tree as inferred by the Bayesian analysis: (A) Leaf shape, (B) Leaf labdanum secretion [49], (C) Pubescence of upper leaf surface, (D) Soil requirements, (E) Insolation conditions [77], (F) Environment. Pie charts at nodes represent the posterior probabilities of Bayesian inference character state evolution (Table 2). Node coding above branches in Fig. 2A.
Mean of posterior probabilities of Bayesian inference character state evolution of successive iterations (9,000,000) by RJ MCMC (see text) for six characters.
| Leaf shape | Labdanum secretion | Leaf pubescence | Soil | Insolation conditions | Environment | |
| Root |
| 0.23/ |
| 0.77/0.17/0.06 | 0.32/0.31/0.16/0.21 | 0.21/0.10/0.22/0.14/0.11/0.13/0.09 |
| Node 1 |
| 0.05/ | 0.01/ | 0.00/ |
|
|
| Node 2 |
| 0.30/ |
|
| 0.05/0.45/0.17/0.33 | 0.06/0.09/0.33/0.18/0.12/0.14/0.08 |
| Node 3 | 0.03/ | 0.35/0.22/0.43 | 0.75/0.10/0.15 |
| 0.02/ | 0.06/0.09/ |
| Node 4 | 0.08 | 0.32/0.14/0.54 | 0.66/0.09/0.25 |
| 0.06/ | 0.09/0.09/ |
| Node 5 | 0.02 | 0.38/0.31/0.31 | 0.70/0.15/0.15 |
| 0.02/ | 0.04/0.11/ |
| Node 6 | 0.04/ | 0.09/0.80/0.11 |
|
| 0.05/0.49/0.05/0.41 | 0.03/0.03/ |
| Node 7 | 0.04/ | 0.65/0.09/0.26 |
|
| 0.01/0.02/0.01/ | 0.07/ |
| Node 8 | 0.07/ | 0.46/0.12/0.42 |
|
| 0.03/0.04/0.04/ | 0.08/ |
| Node 9 | 0.07/ |
|
| 0.11/0.31/0.58 | 0.03/0.04/0.04/ | 0.08/ |
The 95% confidence intervals of the posterior probabilities were all less than±0.004. In bold character state evolution as traced in MacClade optimization (Fig. 2). Particular points of disagreement between Bayesian and the MacClade optimization are underlined. Node codes as in Fig. 2A.
Note: Values in the table reflect estimates based on the averaging over 1000 Bayesian tree.
Leaf shape: linear/linear-lanceolate to elliptic/ovate-lanceolate/ovate.
Labdanum secretion: 0–5/5–10/10–15% per unit leaf dry weight.
Leaf pubescence: glabre/subglabre/dense tomentum.
Soil: silicolous/calcicolous/serpentin.
Insolation conditions: helioxerophyllous/subheliophyllous/subsciophyllous/submesophyllous.
Environment: bush/scrub/Quercus suber-ilex& Pinus woodlands/Quercus suber-ilex woodlands/Quercus pyrenaica-faginea & Pinus woodlands/Pinus halepensis-pinea & Quercus suber woodlands/Abies cephalonica woodlands.
Calculations for log-Bayes factor tests in favour of a dependent model. In the final column, we followed the Bayes factor test [29] in our interpretation of the log-Bayes factor.
| Log-harmonic meana | log-Bayes factor | Significance | ||
| Dependent model | Independent model | |||
| Leaf shape/environment | −12.72 | −13.06 | 0.7 | barely in favour |
| Leaf shape/insolation | −18.12 | −17.36 | −1.5 | against |
| Labdanum secretion/environment | −11.99 | −12.39 | 0.8 | barely in favour |
| Labdanum secretion/insolation | −17.23 | −16.33 | −1.8 | against |
| Leaf pubescence/environment | −11.49 | −11.44 | −0.1 | barely against |
| Leaf pubescence/insolation | −16.25 | −16.58 | 0.6 | barely in favour |
Note:a Mean calculated from 9,000,000 iterations values.
Figure 3Statistical parsimony network representing relationships of the 12 plastid (trnL-trnF, trnK-matK, rbcL, trnS-trnG) haplotypes of the white-flowered Cistus lineage.
Lines indicate mutation steps (single nucleotide substitutions) and dots (•) represent missing haplotypes (extinct or not found). A star-like shape of the network is congruent with a process of radiation in this group.
Penalized Likelihood (bootstrapping of 100 trees) molecular clock estimates of ages for constrained and unconstrained nodes.
| Node | Mean age (Ma) | SD (Ma) | Maximum age (Ma) | Minimum age (Ma) |
| A (11) | 9.65 | 2.21 | 11.00 | 0.58 |
| B (5.3) | 4.87 | 1.10 | 5.30 | 0.21 |
| 1 | 2.11 | 0.87 | 4.93 | 0.14 |
| 2 | 1.01 | 0.31 | 1.99 | 0.06 |
| 3 | 1.78 | 0.45 | 2.74 | 0.12 |
| 4 | 1.25 | 0.32 | 1.80 | 0.07 |
| 5 | 0.53 | 0.15 | 0.83 | 0.03 |
| 6 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.49 | 0.02 |
| 7 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.33 | 0.006 |
| 8 | 1.56 | 0.38 | 2.32 | 0.09 |
| 9 | 0.80 | 0.21 | 1.17 | 0.05 |
| 10 | 0.52 | 0.14 | 0.78 | 0.03 |
| 11 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.33 | 0.01 |
| 12 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.002 |
| 13 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.000 |
| 14 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.003 |
| 15 | 1.47 | 0.35 | 2.09 | 0.08 |
| 16 | 1.04 | 0.25 | 1.41 | 0.06 |
| 17 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.43 | 0.01 |
| 18 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.003 |
| 19 | 0.88 | 0.22 | 1.22 | 0.06 |
| 20 | 0.82 | 0.20 | 1.13 | 0.05 |
| 21 | 0.72 | 0.18 | 0.97 | 0.04 |
| 22 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.34 | 0.009 |
| 23 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.0003 |
| 24 | 0.65 | 0.16 | 0.89 | 0.04 |
| 25 | 0.45 | 0.12 | 0.71 | 0.02 |
| 26 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.002 |
| 27 | 0.61 | 0.23 | 0.91 | 0.00 |
| 28 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.67 | 0.00 |
| 29 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.71 | 0.00 |
Nodes A and B are assigned a maximum age (indicate in parentheses) as derived from palynological studies [66], [67]. Letters and numeric codes for each node of the phylogeny of Cistaceae correspond to those shown in Fig. 4. Ma = million years ago; SD = Standard deviation.
Figure 4Phylogenetic chronogram of the Cistus-Halimium complex based on the Bayesian consensus tree.
Fossil calibration points are indicated on the tree. Shaded area delineates the establishment of the Mediterranean climate 2.8 million years ago [50]. Geological timescales are shown both at the top and the bottom. Photographs illustrate diversity in leaf morphology of the white-flowered Cistus species (only subsp. ladanifer of C. ladanifer, subsp. clusii of C. clusii and subsp. populifolius of C. populifolius are illustrated). Species insolation conditions [77] are plotted on the right side of the tree (, helioxerophyllous and subhelioxerophyllous;, subsciophyllous and submesophyllous).