PURPOSE: To identify genetic markers in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways of sunitinib that predispose for development of toxicities: thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, mucosal inflammation, hand-foot syndrome, and any toxicity according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria higher than grade 2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter pharmacogenetic association study was performed in 219 patients treated with single-agent sunitinib. A total of 31 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 12 candidate genes, together with several nongenetic variants, were analyzed for a possible association with toxicity. In addition, genetic haplotypes were developed and related to toxicity. RESULTS: The risk for leukopenia was increased when the G allele in CYP1A1 2455A/G (odds ratio [OR], 6.24; P = .029) or the T allele in FLT3 738T/C (OR, 2.8; P = .008) were present or CAG in the NR1I3 (5719C/T, 7738A/C, 7837T/G) haplotype (OR, 1.74; P = .041) was absent. Any toxicity higher than grade 2 prevalence was increased when the T allele of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 1191C/T (OR, 2.39; P = .046) or a copy of TT in the ABCG2 (-15622C/T, 1143C/T) haplotype (OR, 2.63; P = .016) were present. The risk for mucosal inflammation was increased in the presence of the G allele in CYP1A1 2455A/G (OR, 4.03; P = .021) and the prevalence of hand-foot syndrome was increased when a copy of TTT in the ABCB1 (3435C/T, 1236C/T, 2677G/T) haplotype (OR, 2.56; P = .035) was present. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study suggests that polymorphisms in specific genes encoding for metabolizing enzymes, efflux transporters, and drug targets are associated with sunitinib-related toxicities. A better understanding of genetic and nongenetic determinants of sunitinib toxicity should help to optimize drug treatment in individual patients.
PURPOSE: To identify genetic markers in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways of sunitinib that predispose for development of toxicities: thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, mucosal inflammation, hand-foot syndrome, and any toxicity according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria higher than grade 2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter pharmacogenetic association study was performed in 219 patients treated with single-agent sunitinib. A total of 31 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 12 candidate genes, together with several nongenetic variants, were analyzed for a possible association with toxicity. In addition, genetic haplotypes were developed and related to toxicity. RESULTS: The risk for leukopenia was increased when the G allele in CYP1A12455A/G (odds ratio [OR], 6.24; P = .029) or the T allele in FLT3738T/C (OR, 2.8; P = .008) were present or CAG in the NR1I3 (5719C/T, 7738A/C, 7837T/G) haplotype (OR, 1.74; P = .041) was absent. Any toxicity higher than grade 2 prevalence was increased when the T allele of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 21191C/T (OR, 2.39; P = .046) or a copy of TT in the ABCG2 (-15622C/T, 1143C/T) haplotype (OR, 2.63; P = .016) were present. The risk for mucosal inflammation was increased in the presence of the G allele in CYP1A12455A/G (OR, 4.03; P = .021) and the prevalence of hand-foot syndrome was increased when a copy of TTT in the ABCB1 (3435C/T, 1236C/T, 2677G/T) haplotype (OR, 2.56; P = .035) was present. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study suggests that polymorphisms in specific genes encoding for metabolizing enzymes, efflux transporters, and drug targets are associated with sunitinib-related toxicities. A better understanding of genetic and nongenetic determinants of sunitinibtoxicity should help to optimize drug treatment in individual patients.
Authors: Jenny J Kim; Susan A J Vaziri; Brian I Rini; Paul Elson; Jorge A Garcia; Robert Wirka; Robert Dreicer; Mahrukh K Ganapathi; Ram Ganapathi Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J S L Kloth; M C Verboom; J J Swen; T van der Straaten; S Sleijfer; A K L Reyners; N Steeghs; H Gelderblom; H J Guchelaar; R H J Mathijssen Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Gracia M Amaya; Rebecca Durandis; David S Bourgeois; James A Perkins; Arsany A Abouda; Kahari J Wines; Mohamed Mohamud; Samuel A Starks; R Nathan Daniels; Klarissa D Jackson Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: C Narjoz; A Cessot; A Thomas-Schoemann; J L Golmard; O Huillard; P Boudou-Rouquette; A Behouche; F Taieb; J P Durand; A Dauphin; R Coriat; M Vidal; M Tod; J Alexandre; M A Loriot; F Goldwasser; B Blanchet Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-10-25 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Tristan M Sissung; Caitlin E Baum; C Tyler Kirkland; Rui Gao; Erin R Gardner; William D Figg Journal: Mol Biotechnol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.695
Authors: N P van Erp; R H J Mathijssen; A A van der Veldt; J B Haanen; A K L Reyners; K Eechoute; E Boven; J A M Wessels; H-J Guchelaar; H Gelderblom Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jacqueline S L Kloth; Heinz-Josef Klümpen; Huixin Yu; Karel Eechoute; Caroline F Samer; Boen L R Kam; Alwin D R Huitema; Youssef Daali; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Bavanthi Balakrishnar; Roelof J Bennink; Mark Wong; Jan H M Schellens; Ron H J Mathijssen; Howard Gurney Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 6.447