Literature DB >> 19665255

Contrasting evolutionary dynamics between angiosperm and mammalian genomes.

Eduard Kejnovsky1, Ilia J Leitch, Andrew R Leitch.   

Abstract

Continuing advances in genomics are revealing substantial differences between genomes of major eukaryotic lineages. Because most data (in terms of depth and phylogenetic breadth) are available for angiosperms and mammals, we explore differences between these groups and show that angiosperms have less highly compartmentalized and more diverse genomes than mammals. In considering the causes of these differences, four mechanisms are highlighted: polyploidy, recombination, retrotransposition and genome silencing, which have different modes and time scales of activity. Angiosperm genomes are evolutionarily more dynamic and labile, whereas mammalian genomes are more stable at both the sequence and chromosome level. We suggest that fundamentally different life strategies and development feedback on the genome exist, influencing dynamics and evolutionary trajectories at all levels from the gene to the genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19665255     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  32 in total

1.  Telomere maintenance in liquid crystalline chromosomes of dinoflagellates.

Authors:  Miloslava Fojtová; Joseph T Y Wong; Martina Dvorácková; Kosmo T H Yan; Eva Sýkorová; Jirí Fajkus
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Conservation of chromosomes syntenic with avian autosomes in squamate reptiles revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  Martina Pokorná; Massimo Giovannotti; Lukáš Kratochvíl; Vincenzo Caputo; Ettore Olmo; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Willem Rens
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Analysis of plastid and mitochondrial DNA insertions in the nucleus (NUPTs and NUMTs) of six plant species: size, relative age and chromosomal localization.

Authors:  M Michalovova; B Vyskot; E Kejnovsky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Next-generation hybridization and introgression.

Authors:  A D Twyford; R A Ennos
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Genome reorganization in F1 hybrids uncovers the role of retrotransposons in reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Natacha Senerchia; François Felber; Christian Parisod
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The large genome size variation in the Hesperis clade was shaped by the prevalent proliferation of DNA repeats and rarer genome downsizing.

Authors:  Petra Hloušková; Terezie Mandáková; Milan Pouch; Pavel Trávníček; Martin A Lysak
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Strong conservation of the bird Z chromosome in reptilian genomes is revealed by comparative painting despite 275 million years divergence.

Authors:  Martina Pokorná; Massimo Giovannotti; Lukáš Kratochvíl; Fumio Kasai; Vladimir A Trifonov; Patricia C M O'Brien; Vincenzo Caputo; Ettore Olmo; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Willem Rens
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Evolutionary Fates and Dynamic Functionalization of Young Duplicate Genes in Arabidopsis Genomes.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Feng Tao; Nicholas C Marowsky; Chuanzhu Fan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 9.  Evolutionary consequences, constraints and potential of polyploidy in plants.

Authors:  H Weiss-Schneeweiss; K Emadzade; T-S Jang; G M Schneeweiss
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.636

10.  A specific insertion of a solo-LTR characterizes the Y-chromosome of Bryonia dioica (Cucurbitaceae).

Authors:  Ryan K Oyama; Martina V Silber; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.