Literature DB >> 31220201

The large genome size variation in the Hesperis clade was shaped by the prevalent proliferation of DNA repeats and rarer genome downsizing.

Petra Hloušková1, Terezie Mandáková1, Milan Pouch1, Pavel Trávníček2, Martin A Lysak1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most crucifer species (Brassicaceae) have small nuclear genomes (mean 1C-value 617 Mb). The species with the largest genomes occur within the monophyletic Hesperis clade (Mandáková et al., Plant Physiology174: 2062-2071; also known as Clade E or Lineage III). Whereas most chromosome numbers in the clade are 6 or 7, monoploid genome sizes vary 16-fold (256-4264 Mb). To get an insight into genome size evolution in the Hesperis clade (~350 species in ~48 genera), we aimed to identify, quantify and localize in situ the repeats from which these genomes are built. We analysed nuclear repeatomes in seven species, covering the phylogenetic and genome size breadth of the clade, by low-pass whole-genome sequencing.
METHODS: Genome size was estimated by flow cytometry. Genomic DNA was sequenced on an Illumina sequencer and DNA repeats were identified and quantified using RepeatExplorer; the most abundant repeats were localized on chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. To evaluate the feasibility of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based comparative chromosome painting in Hesperis-clade species, BACs of arabidopsis were used as painting probes. KEY
RESULTS: Most biennial and perennial species of the Hesperis clade possess unusually large nuclear genomes due to the proliferation of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. The prevalent genome expansion was rarely, but repeatedly, counteracted by purging of transposable elements in ephemeral and annual species.
CONCLUSIONS: The most common ancestor of the Hesperis clade has experienced genome upsizing due to transposable element amplification. Further genome size increases, dominating diversification of all Hesperis-clade tribes, contrast with the overall stability of chromosome numbers. In some subclades and species genome downsizing occurred, presumably as an adaptive transition to an annual life cycle. The amplification versus purging of transposable elements and tandem repeats impacted the chromosomal architecture of the Hesperis-clade species.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Buniaszzm321990 ; zzm321990 Hesperiszzm321990 ; zzm321990 Matthiolazzm321990 ; Brassicaceae; Genome size evolution; Lineage III; chromosome organization; interstitial telomeric repeats (ITRs); repetitive DNA; retrotransposons; tandem repeats

Year:  2019        PMID: 31220201      PMCID: PMC6676390          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcz036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  65 in total

1.  Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human.

Authors:  J Dolezel; J Bartos; H Voglmayr; J Greilhuber
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 2.  The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype.

Authors:  Charles A Knight; Nicole A Molinari; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Toward a cytological characterization of the rice genome.

Authors:  Z Cheng; C R Buell; R A Wing; M Gu; J Jiang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Interphase chromosomes in Arabidopsis are organized as well defined chromocenters from which euchromatin loops emanate.

Authors:  Paul Fransz; J Hans De Jong; Martin Lysak; Monica Ruffini Castiglione; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (approximately 100 Mb) and Drosophila (approximately 175 Mb) using flow cytometry show genome size in Arabidopsis to be approximately 157 Mb and thus approximately 25% larger than the Arabidopsis genome initiative estimate of approximately 125 Mb.

Authors:  Michael D Bennett; Ilia J Leitch; H James Price; J Spencer Johnston
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language.

Authors:  Emmanuel Paradis; Julien Claude; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Katrien M Devos; James K M Brown; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Recent progress in chromosome painting of Arabidopsis and related species.

Authors:  Martin A Lysak; Ales Pecinka; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Dynamic evolution at pericentromeres.

Authors:  Anne E Hall; Gregory C Kettler; Daphne Preuss
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: RepbaseSubmitter and Censor.

Authors:  Oleksiy Kohany; Andrew J Gentles; Lukasz Hankus; Jerzy Jurka
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Transposable Elements and the Identification of Candidate Centromeric Elements in the Prunus Subgenus Cerasus and Its Relatives.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Yan Wang; Jing Zhang; Yan Feng; Qing Chen; Zhen-Shan Liu; Cong-Li Liu; Wen He; Hao Wang; Shao-Feng Yang; Yong Zhang; Ya Luo; Hao-Ru Tang; Xiao-Rong Wang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  Horizontally Acquired nrDNAs Persist in Low Amounts in Host Hordeum Genomes and Evolve Independently of Native nrDNA.

Authors:  Karol Krak; Petra Caklová; David Kopecký; Frank R Blattner; Václav Mahelka
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  The Evolution of Chromosome Numbers: Mechanistic Models and Experimental Approaches.

Authors:  Itay Mayrose; Martin A Lysak
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 4.  Tracing the Evolution of the Angiosperm Genome from the Cytogenetic Point of View.

Authors:  Natalia Borowska-Zuchowska; Magdalena Senderowicz; Dana Trunova; Bozena Kolano
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.