Literature DB >> 19661824

The location of the inferior and superior temporal blood vessels and interindividual variability of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Donald C Hood1, Jennifer A Salant, Stella N Arthur, Robert Ritch, Jeffrey M Liebmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if adjusting for blood vessel (BV) location can decrease the intersubject variability of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured with optical coherence tomography (OCT). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One eye of 50 individuals with normal vision was tested with OCT and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP). The SLP and OCT RNFL thickness profiles were determined for a peripapillary circle 3.4 mm in diameter. The midpoints between the superior temporal vein and artery (STva) and the inferior temporal vein and artery (ITva) were determined at the location where the vessels cross the 3.4 mm circle. The average OCT and SLP RNFL thicknesses for quadrants and arcuate sectors of the lower and upper optic disc were obtained before and after adjusting for BV location. This adjustment was carried out by shifting the RNFL profiles based upon the locations of the STva and ITva relative to the mean locations of all 50 individuals.
RESULTS: Blood vessel locations ranged over 39 (STva) and 33 degrees (ITva) for the 50 eyes. The location of the leading edge of the OCT and SLP profiles was correlated with the location of the BVs for both the superior [r=0.72 (OCT) and 0.72 (SLP)] and inferior [r=0.34 and 0.43] temporal vessels. However, the variability in the OCT and SLP thickness measurements showed little change due to shifting. After shifting, the difference in the coefficient of variation ranged from -2.1% (shifted less variable) to +1.7% (unshifted less variable).
CONCLUSIONS: The shape of the OCT and SLP RNFL profiles varied systematically with the location of the superior and inferior superior veins and arteries. However, adjusting for the location of these major temporal BVs did not decrease the variability for measures of OCT or SLP RNFL thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19661824      PMCID: PMC2889235          DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181af31ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  26 in total

1.  Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects.

Authors:  Jin Wook Jeoung; Ki Ho Park; Tae Woo Kim; Sang In Khwarg; Dong Myung Kim
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Roberto M Vessani; Remo Susanna; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  J S Schuman; M R Hee; C A Puliafito; C Wong; T Pedut-Kloizman; C P Lin; E Hertzmark; J A Izatt; E A Swanson; J G Fujimoto
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-05

5.  A comparison of optical coherence tomography and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of nerve fiber layer damage in glaucoma.

Authors:  L M Zangwill; J Williams; C C Berry; S Knauer; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma.

Authors:  C Sanchez-Galeana; C Bowd; E Z Blumenthal; P A Gokhale; L M Zangwill; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Blood vessel contributions to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness profiles measured with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Brad Fortune; Stella N Arthur; Danli Xing; Jennifer A Salant; Robert Ritch; Jeffrey M Liebmann
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2008 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Marie-Josée Fredette; William J Feuer; Douglas R Anderson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Identifying early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Douglas Hoffman; Dana P Tannenbaum; Simon K Law; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Glaucoma detection using different Stratus optical coherence tomography protocols.

Authors:  Jesper Leth Hougaard; Anders Heijl; Boel Bengtsson
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2006-10-19
View more
  30 in total

1.  The locations of circumpapillary glaucomatous defects seen on frequency-domain OCT scans.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Diane L Wang; Ali S Raza; Carlos Gustavo de Moraes; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Influence of the disc-fovea angle on limits of RNFL variability and glaucoma discrimination.

Authors:  Navid Amini; Sara Nowroozizadeh; Nila Cirineo; Sharon Henry; Ted Chang; Tom Chou; Anne L Coleman; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Ametropia, retinal anatomy, and OCT abnormality patterns in glaucoma. 1. Impacts of refractive error and interartery angle.

Authors:  Tobias Elze; Neda Baniasadi; Qingying Jin; Hui Wang; Mengyu Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Ametropia, retinal anatomy, and OCT abnormality patterns in glaucoma. 2. Impacts of optic nerve head parameters.

Authors:  Neda Baniasadi; Mengyu Wang; Hui Wang; Qingying Jin; Tobias Elze
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Multifocal visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity correlate with ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Divya Narayanan; Han Cheng; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  The Nature of Macular Damage in Glaucoma as Revealed by Averaging Optical Coherence Tomography Data.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Ali S Raza; Carlos Gustavo V de Moraes; Chris A Johnson; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography in assessing visual pathway in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Michal Laron; Han Cheng; Bin Zhang; Jade S Schiffman; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 8.  Role of the macular optical coherence tomography scan in neuro-ophthalmology.

Authors:  Randy H Kardon
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer thickness and vision loss in young children with optic pathway gliomas.

Authors:  Sherry Gu; Natalie Glaug; Avital Cnaan; Roger J Packer; Robert A Avery
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Between-subject variability in asymmetry analysis of macular thickness.

Authors:  Muhammed S Alluwimi; William H Swanson; Victor E Malinovsky
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.