L M Zangwill1, J Williams, C C Berry, S Knauer, R N Weinreb. 1. Glaucoma Center and Diagnostic Imaging Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0946, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements with established methods for assessment of glaucomatous damage using RNFL photography and visual field testing. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight eyes of 58 healthy volunteer ocular hypertensive patients, glaucoma suspect patients, and glaucoma patients were included. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography 3.4-mm diameter circular scans were obtained within 3 months of RNFL photography and standard achromatic visual field testing. Three independent observers graded RNFL photographs using two standardized protocols. For each method, superior and inferior arcuate bundles were scored separately, and interobserver and intraobserver variation was measured. Standard achromatic visual field mean deviation in the superior and inferior hemifields was compared with RNFL damage as assessed by photography and OCT RNFL thickness measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual field mean deviation and severity of glaucomatous RNFL damage as assessed by photography. RESULTS:Optical coherence tomography RNFL thickness decreased with increasing RNFL damage as assessed by photography using both methods of photographic assessment. Standard achromatic perimetry mean deviation was significantly associated with OCT RNFL thickness (R(2) = 35%-43%) and RNFL photography severity score (R(2) = 18%-29%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the OCT shows promise for providing quantitative measures of RNFL thickness for diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements with established methods for assessment of glaucomatous damage using RNFL photography and visual field testing. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight eyes of 58 healthy volunteer ocular hypertensivepatients, glaucoma suspect patients, and glaucomapatients were included. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography 3.4-mm diameter circular scans were obtained within 3 months of RNFL photography and standard achromatic visual field testing. Three independent observers graded RNFL photographs using two standardized protocols. For each method, superior and inferior arcuate bundles were scored separately, and interobserver and intraobserver variation was measured. Standard achromatic visual field mean deviation in the superior and inferior hemifields was compared with RNFL damage as assessed by photography and OCT RNFL thickness measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual field mean deviation and severity of glaucomatous RNFL damage as assessed by photography. RESULTS: Optical coherence tomography RNFL thickness decreased with increasing RNFL damage as assessed by photography using both methods of photographic assessment. Standard achromatic perimetry mean deviation was significantly associated with OCT RNFL thickness (R(2) = 35%-43%) and RNFL photography severity score (R(2) = 18%-29%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the OCT shows promise for providing quantitative measures of RNFL thickness for diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma.
Authors: Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Xiang-Run Huang; Ye Zhou; Robert W Knighton; Wei Kong; William J Feuer Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Zvia Burgansky-Eliash; Gadi Wollstein; Avni Patel; Richard A Bilonick; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; William D Dilworth; Joel S Schuman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2007-01-10 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Donald C Hood; Susan Anderson; Jacinthe Rouleau; Adam S Wenick; Larissa K Grover; Myles M Behrens; Jeffrey G Odel; Andrew G Lee; Randy H Kardon Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-09-17 Impact factor: 12.079