Literature DB >> 19661796

Preliminary evaluation of psychoeducational support interventions on quality of life in rural breast cancer survivors after primary treatment.

Karen Meneses1, Patrick McNees, Andres Azuero, Victoria Wochna Loerzel, Xiaogang Su, Lauren A Hassey.   

Abstract

Although most cancer survivors are at risk for being lost in the transition from treatment to survivorship, rural breast cancer survivors face special challenges that might place them at particular risk. This small-scale preliminary study had 2 specific aims: (aim 1) establish the feasibility of rural breast cancer survivors participation in a longitudinal quality of life (QOL) intervention trial and (aim 2) determine the effects of the Breast Cancer Education Intervention (BCEI) on overall QOL. Fifty-three rural breast cancer survivors were randomized to either an experimental (n = 27) or a wait-control arm (n = 26). Participants in the experimental arm received the BCEI consisting of 3 face-to-face education and support sessions and 2 face-to-face and 3 telephone follow-up sessions, along with supplemental written and audiotape materials over a 6-month period. Breast Cancer Education Intervention modules and interventions are organized within a QOL framework. To address the possible effects of attention, wait-control participants received 3 face-to-face sessions and 3 telephone sessions during the first 6 months of participation in the study, but not the BCEI intervention. Research questions addressing aim 1 were as follows: (a) can rural breast cancer survivors be recruited into a longitudinal intervention trial, and (b) can their participation be retained. Research questions for aim 2 were as follows: (a) do participants who received the BCEI show improvement in overall QOL, and (b) is the QOL improvement sustained over time. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures general linear mixed models. Results demonstrated the ability to recruit and retain 53 rural breast cancer survivors, that the experimental arm showed improvement in overall QOL (P = .013), and that there were significant differences in overall QOL between the experimental and wait-control groups at both months 3 and 6. Thus, it appears that at least some rural breast cancer survivors can and will participate in a larger trial and will maintain their participation and that those that do participate experience significant QOL benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19661796      PMCID: PMC2933202          DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181a850e6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  37 in total

1.  Disparities in mammography screening in rural areas: analysis of county differences in North Carolina.

Authors:  Doyle M Cummings; Lauren M Whetstone; Jo Anne Earp; Linda Mayne
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Neighborhood poverty and self-reported health among low-income, rural women, 50 years and older.

Authors:  E Kobetz; M Daniel; J A Earp
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.078

3.  Impact of patient distance to radiation therapy on mastectomy use in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Anneke T Schroen; David R Brenin; Maria D Kelly; William A Knaus; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Racial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and cancer screening practices among a triracial rural population.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Cathy Tatum; Julia Rushing; Robert Michielutte; Ronny Bell; Kristie Long Foley; Marisa Bittoni; Stephanie Dickinson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Rural-urban differences in cancer care: results from the Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project.

Authors:  Thomas E Elliott; Barbara A Elliott; Colleen M Renier; Irina V Haller
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  2004-09

6.  Rural breast cancer treatment: evidence from the Reaching Communities for Cancer Care (REACH) project.

Authors:  S E Tropman; T C Ricketts; E Paskett; T A Hatzell; M R Cooper; T Aldrich
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Experiences of rural women with breast cancer receiving social support via audioconferencing.

Authors:  Shirley Solberg; Jon Church; Vernon Curran
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 8.  Abnormal Pap test results and the rurality factor.

Authors:  Elaine Dietsch; Heather Gibb; Karen Francis
Journal:  Aust J Rural Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.662

9.  A consultation with Canadian rural women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ross E Gray; Pamela James; Jackie Manthorne; Judy Gould; Margaret I Fitch
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England.

Authors:  Hannah Jordan; Paul Roderick; David Martin; Sarah Barnett
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 3.918

View more
  13 in total

1.  Multi-Level Assessment to Reach Out to Rural Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Silvia Gisiger-Camata; Natasia Adams; Timiya ShaRel Nolan; Karen Meneses
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-18

Review 2.  Exploration of return-to-work interventions for breast cancer patients: a scoping review.

Authors:  Karine Bilodeau; Dominique Tremblay; Marie-José Durand
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Adapting an evidence-based survivorship intervention for Latina breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Karen Meneses; Silvia Gisiger-Camata; Yu-Mei Schoenberger; Robert Weech-Maldonado; Patrick McNees
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-03

4.  A telephone-based education and support intervention for Rural Breast Cancer Survivors: a randomized controlled trial comparing two implementation strategies in rural Florida.

Authors:  Karen Meneses; Maria Pisu; Andres Azuero; Rachel Benz; Xiaogang Su; Patrick McNees
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.

Authors:  Emma Ream; Amanda Euesden Hughes; Anna Cox; Katy Skarparis; Alison Richardson; Vibe H Pedersen; Theresa Wiseman; Angus Forbes; Andrew Bryant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-02

6.  Patient-centered outcome evaluation of the Rural Breast Cancer Survivors Intervention.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Schoenberger; Rachel Benz; Patrick McNees; Karen Meneses
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Psychosocial service use: a qualitative exploration from the perspective of rural Australian cancer patients.

Authors:  Kate Gunn; Deborah Turnbull; J Lindsay McWha; Matthew Davies; Ian Olver
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  A systematic review of behavioral interventions for rural breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Chelsea G Ratcliff; Debbie Torres; Emily A Tullos; Yimin Geng; Qian Lu
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-08-19

9.  Variation in resources needed to implement psychosocial support interventions for rural breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Maria Pisu; Karen Meneses; Andres Azuero; Rachel Benz; Xiaogang Su; Patrick McNees
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  After the Psychoeducational Intervention: Turkish Breast Cancer Survivors' Experiences.

Authors:  Figen Şengün İnan; Besti Üstün
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.