Literature DB >> 16192590

Impact of patient distance to radiation therapy on mastectomy use in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Anneke T Schroen1, David R Brenin, Maria D Kelly, William A Knaus, Craig L Slingluff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment access underlies quality cancer care. We hypothesize that mastectomy rates in a rural state are independently influenced by distance to radiation therapy (XRT) and by changing XRT access through opening new facilities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Early-stage breast cancer patients diagnosed from 1996 to 2000 were identified in the Virginia state registry. Distance from patient zip code to nearest XRT facility was calculated with geographical software. Distance to XRT facility (< or = 10, > 10 to 25, > 25 to 50, and > 50 miles), American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor stage, age, race, and diagnosis year were evaluated for influencing mastectomy rate. Mastectomy use within 15 miles of five new facilities was assessed before and after opening.
RESULTS: Among 20,094 patients, 43% underwent mastectomy, 53% underwent lumpectomy, and therapy of 4% of patients is unknown. Twenty-nine percent of patients lived more than 10 miles from XRT facility. Mastectomy increased with distance to XRT facility (43% at < or = 10 miles, 47% at > 10 to 25 miles, 53% at > 25 to 50 miles, and 58% at > 50 miles; P < .001). Among 11,597 patients with T1 (< 2 cm) tumors, mastectomy also varied by distance (31% at < or = 10 miles, 36% at > 10 to 25 miles, 41% at > 25 to 50 miles, and 49% at > 50 miles; P < .001). In multivariate analysis, mastectomy use was independently influenced by XRT distance after adjusting for age, race, T stage, and diagnosis year. Over the study period, mastectomy rates declined from 48% to 43% across Virginia, and there were similar declines in a 15-mile area around four new radiation facilities in urban settings. However, mastectomies decreased from 61% to 45% around a new XRT facility in a rural setting.
CONCLUSION: Distance to XRT facility significantly impacts mastectomy use. Opportunities for increasing breast-conservation rates through improved XRT access exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16192590     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  76 in total

Review 1.  Geographic Access to Mammography and Its Relationship to Breast Cancer Screening and Stage at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jenna A Khan-Gates; Jennifer L Ersek; Jan M Eberth; Swann A Adams; Sandi L Pruitt
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-07-26

2.  HIV Care Initiation Delay Among Rural Residents in the Southeastern United States, 1996 to 2012.

Authors:  Brettania L W Lopes; Joseph J Eron; Michael J Mugavero; William C Miller; Sonia Napravnik
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Brian R Englum; Asvin M Ganapathi; Xiaofei Wang; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Energy and public health: the challenge of peak petroleum.

Authors:  Howard Frumkin; Jeremy Hess; Stephen Vindigni
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Racial disparities in travel time to radiotherapy facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Shannon Graham; Randall Young; Brian Lewis; Barry Flanagan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  A qualitative study of rural women's views for the treatment of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Eli Ristevski; Melanie Regan; David Birks; Nicole Steers; Anny Byrne
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Geographic Variation Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction Utilization in Ontario, Canada and Plastic Surgeon Availability: A Population-Based Observational Study.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Toni Zhong; Rahim Moineddin; Gillian L Booth; Alexandra M Easson; Kimberly Fernandes; Peter Gozdyra; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Identification of underserved areas for urologic cancer care.

Authors:  Matthew Mossanen; Jason Izard; Jonathan L Wright; Jonathan D Harper; Michael P Porter; Kenn B Daratha; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Racial disparities in the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a national Medicare study.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Ya-Chen T Shih; Ying Xu; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith; George H Perkins; Welela Tereffe; Wendy A Woodward; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Factors associated with patients in the Scottish Highlands who chose mastectomy when suitable for breast conservation.

Authors:  Rosalyn Shearer; Majid Rashid; Gill Hubbard; Nick Abbott; Ian Daltrey; Russell Mullen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.