Literature DB >> 19661091

Uptake of risk-reducing surgery in unaffected women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer is risk, age, and time dependent.

D Gareth R Evans1, Fiona Lalloo, Linda Ashcroft, Andrew Shenton, Tara Clancy, Andrew D Baildam, Anne Brain, Penelope Hopwood, Anthony Howell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The uptake of risk-reducing surgery in women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer is highly variable between countries and centers within countries. We have investigated the rate, timing, and age of uptake of surgery in the northwest of England to report the results after up to 7 years in a Regional Genetics center.
METHODS: Uptake was documented in 211 known unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers from 509 families and in 3,515 women at >25% lifetime risk of breast cancer without known mutations.
RESULTS: Of the 211 mutation carriers, 40% opted for bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) and 45% underwent bilateral risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (BRRSPO). Uptake of BRRM was significantly related to lifetime risk and age but continued over several years. In women not known to carry a BRCA mutation, 6.4% of women at 40% to 45% lifetime risk, 2.5% of women at 33% to 39% lifetime risk, and 1.8% of women at 25% to 32% lifetime risk underwent BRRM (P < 0.005). BRRSPO uptake was greater in BRCA1 (52%) than BRCA2 (28%) carriers but in both groups tended to occur within the first 2 years after gene test (except in the youngest age group) and in women between the ages of 35 and 45.
CONCLUSION: To truly assess the uptake of risk-reducing surgery, longer-term follow-up is necessary particularly in younger women who are likely to delay BRRSPO. Careful risk counseling does seem to influence women's decisions for surgery, although the effect is not immediate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19661091     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  49 in total

1.  Heightened perception of breast cancer risk in young women at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Moira O'Connor; Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Sarah O'Sullivan; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Body image issues after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Jessica P Gopie; Marc A M Mureau; Caroline Seynaeve; Moniek M Ter Kuile; Marian B E Menke-Pluymers; Reinier Timman; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Factors affecting the decision to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women with BRCA gene mutation.

Authors:  Dongwon Kim; Eunyoung Kang; Euijun Hwang; Young Sun; Yoonsun Hwang; Cha Kyong Yom; Kidong Kim; Jae Hong No; Yong-Beom Kim; Sung-Won Kim
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Long-term outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: risk reduction and surveillance.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Claudine Isaacs; Kristi D Graves; Elizabeth Poggi; Beth N Peshkin; Christy Gell; Clinton Finch; Scott Kelly; Kathryn L Taylor; Lauren Perley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Karen Lisa Smith; Claudine Isaacs
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

6.  Catalysts to withdrawal from familial ovarian cancer screening for surgery and reactions to discontinued screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kate J Lifford; Alison Clements; Lindsay Fraser; Deborah Lancastle; Kate Brain
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Breast and ovarian cancer risk management in a French cohort of 158 women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation: patient choices and outcome.

Authors:  Pascale This; Anne de la Rochefordière; Alexia Savignoni; Marie Christine Falcou; Anne Tardivon; Fabienne Thibault; Séverine Alran; Virgine Fourchotte; Alfred Fitoussi; Benoit Couturaud; Sylvie Dolbeault; Remy J Salmon; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Bernard Asselain; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Understanding the needs of women considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  Carol Cherry; Mary Ropka; Jennifer Lyle; Laura Napolitano; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

9.  Psychosocial factors and uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at high risk for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Melanie A Price; Phyllis N Butow; Janan Karatas; Judy Wilson; Louise Heiniger; Brandi Baylock; Margaret Charles; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Kelly-Anne Phillips
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Time trends in uptake rates of risk-reducing mastectomy in Israeli asymptomatic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lee Galmor; Rinat Bernstein-Molho; Miri Sklair-Levy; Dana Madoursky-Feldman; Dov Zippel; Yael Laitman; Eitan Friedman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.