Literature DB >> 19657466

On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast.

John Kingston1, Randy L Diehl, Cecilia J Kirk, Wendy A Castleman.   

Abstract

Several fixed classification experiments test the hypothesis that F(1), f(0), and closure voicing covary between intervocalic stops contrasting for [voice] because they integrate perceptually. The perceptual property produced by the integration of these acoustic properties was at first predicted to be the presence of low frequency energy in the vicinity of the stop, which is considerable in [+voice] stops but slight in [-voice] stops. Both F(1) and f(0) at the edges of vowels flanking the stop were found to integrate perceptually with the continuation of voicing into the stop, but not to integrate with one another. These results indicate that the perceptually relevant property is instead the continuation of low frequency energy across the vowel-consonant border and not merely the amount of low frequency energy present near the stop. Other experiments establish that neither F(1) nor f(0) at vowel edge integrate perceptually with closure duration, which shows that only auditorily similar properties integrate and not any two properties that reliably covary. Finally, the experiments show that these acoustic properties integrate perceptually (or fail to) in the same way in non-speech analogues as in the original speech. This result indicates that integration arises from the auditory similarity of certain acoustic correlates of the [voice] contrast.

Year:  2008        PMID: 19657466      PMCID: PMC2720544          DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phon        ISSN: 0095-4470


  36 in total

1.  Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels.

Authors:  J Kingston; N A Macmillan; L W Dickey; R Thorburn; C Bartels
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English.

Authors:  L J Raphael
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants.

Authors:  S E Blumstein; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Dimensions in the perception of fortis and lenis plosives.

Authors:  K J Kohler
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  Effect of fundamental frequency on medial [+voice]/[-voice] judgments.

Authors:  R L Diehl; M R Molis
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Integrality of nasalization and F1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: a detection-theoretic application of the Garner paradigm.

Authors:  J Kingston; N A Macmillan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants.

Authors:  D Kewley-Port; D B Pisoni; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

10.  Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception.

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  11 in total

1.  Diagonal d' does not (always) diagnose failure of separability: An addendum to.

Authors:  Noah H Silbert; Kenneth J de Jong; Robin D Thomas; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009-07-01

2.  Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Natalya Kaganovich; Courtney Driscoll-Huber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Syllable structure and integration of voicing and manner of articulation information in labial consonant identification.

Authors:  Noah H Silbert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual dimensions influence auditory category learning.

Authors:  Casey L Roark; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Prior experience with negative spectral correlations promotes information integration during auditory category learning.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Molly J Henry; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

6.  Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach.

Authors:  Jennifer Cole; Gary Linebaugh; Cheyenne Munson; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-04-01

7.  Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants' perception of sibilants.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià; Grant L McGuire; Amanda Seidl; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2011-07-01

8.  Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.

Authors:  Jessamyn Schertz; Taehong Cho; Andrew Lotto; Natasha Warner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.

Authors:  Jessamyn Schertz; Taehong Cho; Andrew Lotto; Natasha Warner
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-09-01

10.  Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners' recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.