Literature DB >> 19654112

Cumulative reproductive outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a report on 1498 couples.

W Verpoest1, P Haentjens, M De Rycke, C Staessen, K Sermon, M Bonduelle, P Devroey, I Liebaers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Couples undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) have a different background and set of treatment characteristics to couples undergoing regular IVF or ICSI. The aim of this study was to analyse the cumulative reproductive outcome of a large cohort of couples undergoing PGD in relation to a number of explanatory variables potentially affecting the prognosis.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate real (observed) and expected (calculated) cumulative delivery rates, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess the effect of age, number of cumulus oocyte complexes collected, fertility status, parity, genetic category and method of pituitary suppression.
RESULTS: Between 1993 and 2005, 2753 unselected consecutive cycles of ICSI and PGD were carried out in 1498 couples. The cumulative observed delivery rate overall per couple with a maximum of six treatment cycles of ICSI and PGD performed was 29%. The expected cumulative delivery rate (max six cycles) overall was 62%. There were no significant differences in cumulative delivery rates between the different genetic categories (i.e. availability of transferable embryos after PGD of 50 or 75%, chromosomal translocations or aneuploidy screening). The cumulative reproductive outcome in this PGD cohort was also not significantly affected by the fertility status of the couple, their parity or the method of pituitary suppression. However, the age of the patient and the number of oocytes contributed significantly to the reproductive results.
CONCLUSION: This prospective observational study demonstrates that age has a significantly negative effect on outcome of PGD, due to poor reproductive performance of female partners 40 years of age and older. The number of oocytes collected has a significant and independent effect. The other factors studied did not affect the cumulative reproductive outcome in this PGD cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19654112     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in female and male carriers of reciprocal translocations: clinical outcome until delivery of 312 cycles.

Authors:  Kathelijn Keymolen; Catherine Staessen; Willem Verpoest; Inge Liebaers; Maryse Bonduelle
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for inherited neurological disorders.

Authors:  Ilan Tur-Kaspa; Roohi Jeelani; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Vitrification of human embryos subjected to blastomere biopsy for pre-implantation genetic screening produces higher survival and pregnancy rates than slow freezing.

Authors:  Levent Keskintepe; Geoffrey Sher; Anna Machnicka; Drew Tortoriello; Aykut Bayrak; Jeffrey Fisch; Yuksel Agca
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  In vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing: the need for expanded insurance coverage.

Authors:  Madison K Kilbride
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Clinical Considerations of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Monogenic Diseases.

Authors:  Xiaokun Hu; Jing Wang; Yubin Li; Yizi Wang; Chenhui Ding; Yanhong Zeng; Yanwen Xu; Canquan Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Current status of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Japan.

Authors:  Kenji Sato; Kou Sueoka; Kotaro Iino; Hiroshi Senba; Mariko Suzuki; Yuki Mizuguchi; Yoko Izumi; Suguru Sato; Akira Nakabayashi; Mamoru Tanaka
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2015-05-28

7.  Experiences of Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Sweden: a Three-Year Follow-Up of Men and Women.

Authors:  Stina Järvholm; Ann Thurin-Kjellberg; Malin Broberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Differences in pregnancy outcomes in donor egg frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following preimplantation genetic screening (PGS): a single center retrospective study.

Authors:  Alison Coates; Brandon J Bankowski; Allen Kung; Darren K Griffin; Santiago Munne
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: design or too much design.

Authors:  W Verpoest
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

Review 10.  Management of hereditary angioedema in pregnant women: a review.

Authors:  Teresa Caballero; Julio Canabal; Daniela Rivero-Paparoni; Rosario Cabañas
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.