Literature DB >> 32817410

In vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing: the need for expanded insurance coverage.

Madison K Kilbride1.   

Abstract

Technological advances in genetic testing have enabled prospective parents to learn about their risk of passing a genetic condition to their future children. One option for those who want to ensure that their biological children do not inherit a genetic condition is to create embryos through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and use a technique called preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to screen embryos for genetic abnormalities before implantation. Unfortunately, due to its high cost, IVF-with-PGT is out of reach for the vast majority of Americans. This article addresses an issue that has been underexplored in the medical ethics literature: the lack of insurance coverage for IVF-with-PGT.Within the US system, a key concept in insurance is that of medically necessary care, which broadly consists of diagnostic services and treatment services. In this article, I argue that IVF-with-PGT could be classified as either a diagnostic service or as a treatment service. To make this case, I show that IVF-with-PGT is similar to other types of services that are often covered by US insurance providers. In light of these similarities, I argue that the current system is inconsistent with respect to what is-and is not-covered by insurance. To promote consistency and fairness in coverage, like cases should be treated alike-starting with greater coverage for IVF-with-PGT. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethics; genethics; genetic information; genetic screening/testing; in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32817410      PMCID: PMC7892638          DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  24 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: does age of onset matter (anymore)?

Authors:  Timothy Krahn
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-11-01

2.  Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Why we should all pay for fertility treatment: an argument from ethics and policy.

Authors:  Josephine Johnston; Michael K Gusmano
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for inherited neurological disorders.

Authors:  Ilan Tur-Kaspa; Roohi Jeelani; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Serious genetic disorders: can or should they be defined?

Authors:  Dorothy C Wertz; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-02-15

7.  High-risk individuals' perceptions of reproductive genetic testing for CDH1 mutations.

Authors:  Nina Hallowell; Shirlene Badger; Sue Richardson; Carlos Caldas; Richard H Hardwick; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Julia Lawton
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Perspectives of couples with high risk of transmitting genetic disorders.

Authors:  Anna M Musters; Moniek Twisk; Nico J Leschot; Cor Oosterwijk; Johanna C Korevaar; Sjoerd Repping; Fulco van der Veen; Mariette Goddijn
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Naturalism and the social model of disability: allied or antithetical?

Authors:  Dominic A Sisti
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  What is it to be healthy?

Authors:  Elselijn Kingma
Journal:  Analysis       Date:  2007-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Acceptable, hopeful, and useful: development and mixed-method evaluation of an educational tool about reproductive options for people with sickle cell disease or trait.

Authors:  Isabel V Lake; Jake A Ruddy; James A Saba; Sajya M Singh; Macy L Early; Rachel J Strodel; Sophie Lanzkron; Jennifer W Mack; Emily R Meier; Mindy S Christianson; Lydia H Pecker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.