Literature DB >> 19651349

Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship.

Andréia Fialho Rodrigues1, Marcelo Reis Fraga, Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the condyle-fossa relationship, the concentric position of the condyles, and the dimensional and positional symmetries between the right and left condyles in Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusion samples.
METHODS: Thirty subjects from 12 to 38 years of age with Class II Division 1 malocclusion and 16 subjects from 13 to 41 years of age with Class III malocclusion had computed tomography of the temporomandibular joints. The images obtained from the axial slices were evaluated for possible asymmetries in size and position between the condylar processes associated with these malocclusions. The images obtained from the sagittal slices were used to assess the depth of the mandibular fossa, the condyle-fossa relationship, and the concentric position of the condyles associated with these malocclusions. Paired Student t tests were applied, and Pearson product moment correlations were determined after measurements on both sides were obtained.
RESULTS: In the Class II Division 1 sample, the distance of condylar process/midsagittal plane (P = 0.019) and posterior joint space (P = 0.049) showed statistically significant differences between the right and left sides. In the Class III sample, there was no statistically significant difference between sides. Statistically significant (P <0.05) anterior positioning of the condyles was observed (nonconcentric positioning) in both the Class II Division 1 group and the Class III group.
CONCLUSIONS: In the Class II Division 1 malocclusion sample, the distance of condylar process/midsagittal plane and posterior articular space had statistically significant differences between the right and left sides. In the Class III sample, there was no statistically significant difference between sides. Evaluation of the concentric position of the condyles in their mandibular fossae showed nonconcentric positioning for the right and left sides in both the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651349     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  25 in total

1.  Correlation between condylar position and different sagittal skeletal facial types.

Authors:  Maryam Paknahad; Shoaleh Shahidi; Hajar Abbaszade
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  TMJ in facial class III deformity. Condylar morphology relations.

Authors:  Gonzalo Muñoz; Sergio Olate; Mario Cantín; Bélgica Vásquez; Mariano Del Sol
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-15

3.  Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Condylar Symmetry and Condyle-Fossa Relationship of the Temporomandibular Joint in Subjects with Normal Occlusion and Malocclusion: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta; Swaroopa Rani Ponnada; Kranthi Praveen Raju Gaddam; Kiran Perumalla; Imran Khan; Naqeed Abdul Mohammed
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  [Comparative study of the condylar positions in different sagittal skeletal facial types with cone-beam computed tomography].

Authors:  Lingchen Du; Qiang Zhao; Meiyu Tian; Chao Heng; Xuetao Cui; Qing Li
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2014-08

5.  Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in adolescents with various skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Jong-Moon Chae; Jae Hyun Park; Kiyoshi Tai; Kyosuke Mizutani; Satoshi Uzuka; Wataru Miyashita; Hye Young Seo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Volumetric and morphological analysis of condyle and glenoid fossa on computed tomography.

Authors:  Gozde Serindere; Ceren Aktuna Belgin; Mehmet Serindere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Evaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions.

Authors:  Aslıhan Akbulut; Delal Dara Kılınç
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Facial asymmetry and condylar hyperplasia: considerations for diagnosis in 27 consecutives patients.

Authors:  Sergio Olate; Andrés Almeida; Juan Pablo Alister; Pablo Navarro; Henrique Duque Netto; Márcio de Moraes
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-10-25

9.  Condyle fossa relationship associated with functional posterior crossbite, before and after rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Rosalia Leonardi; Mario Caltabiano; Costanza Cavallini; Edoardo Sicurezza; Ersilia Barbato; Concetto Spampinato; Daniela Giordano
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 10.  [Research progress on the relationship between centric relation and orthodontic treatment].

Authors:  Dian Jing; Yu Shen; Pu Yang; Zhi-He Zhao
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.